Mortality and morbidity benefits of air pollution (SO2 and PM10) absorption attributable to woodland in Britain.

Forests in Britain produce social and environmental benefits, in addition to marketable timber outputs. One such non-market benefit is the reduction in air pollution, linked to health impacts (mortality and morbidity). This study assesses the benefits of SO2 and PM10 absorption by trees in terms of extending life expectancy of the population and reducing hospital admissions. Working at a resolution of 1 km2 with woodland over 2 ha, it is estimated that, for Britain as a whole, woodland saves between 5 and 7 deaths, that would otherwise have been brought forward, and between 4 and 6 hospital admissions each year. The economic value of the health effect of woodland is estimated to be at least 900,000 pounds Sterling per year. Smaller areas of woodland, often located closer to population, sometimes strategically planted close to pollution sources, will generate additional air pollution absorption benefits to those estimated here. Researching such benefits would require more detailed data than is available at present for a national study. However, the health benefits of woodland are relatively small in comparison to other non-market forestry benefits.

[1]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Air pollution and daily mortality: a review and meta analysis. , 1994, Environmental research.

[2]  B. Ostro,et al.  Estimating the health effects of air pollutants : a method with an application to Jakarta , 1994 .

[3]  Gail Taylor,et al.  THE CAPTURE OF PARTICULATE POLLUTION BY TREES AT FIVE CONTRASTING URBAN SITES , 2000 .

[4]  H. Taha Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin , 1996 .

[5]  D. Nowak,et al.  Estimating cost effectiveness of residential yard trees for improving air quality in Sacramento, California, using existing models , 1998 .

[6]  Nicole A.H. Janssen,et al.  Mass concentration and elemental composition of airborne particulate matter at street and background locations , 1997 .

[7]  Gail Taylor,et al.  Effective Tree Species for Local Airquality Management , 2000, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[8]  D Fowler,et al.  Modelling photochemical oxidant formation, transport, deposition and exposure of terrestrial ecosystems. , 1999, Environmental pollution.

[9]  David Pearce,et al.  Particulate matter and human health in the United Kingdom , 1996 .

[10]  P. Freer-Smith,et al.  The uptake of particulates by an urban woodland: site description and particulate composition. , 1997, Environmental pollution.

[11]  K. P. Beckett,et al.  Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution. , 1998, Environmental pollution.

[12]  U. Ackermann-Liebrich,et al.  Particulate matter < 10 μm (PM10) and total suspended particulates (TSP) in urban, rural and alpine air in Switzerland , 1995 .

[13]  J Pekkanen,et al.  Effects of ultrafine and fine particles in urban air on peak expiratory flow among children with asthmatic symptoms. , 1997, Environmental research.

[14]  Ari Rabl,et al.  Interpretation of Air Pollution Mortality: Number of Deaths or Years of Life Lost? , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[15]  David J. Nowak,et al.  A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone. , 2000 .