An interval uncertainty propagation method using polynomial chaos expansion and its application in complicated multibody dynamic systems

This paper is devoted to the construction of a nonintrusive interval uncertainty propagation approach for the response bounds evaluation of multibody systems. The motivation for this effort is twofold. First, the traditional methods using the Taylor inclusion function and interval arithmetic usually lead to the wrapping effect. Second, the real-life multibody dynamics models are mostly large systems, which are highly rigid, nonlinear, and discontinuous; however, many conventional, intrusive interval analysis methods are not suitable for such large, complicated multibody systems. To end these, a polynomial chaos inclusion function using Legendre orthogonal basis is presented for analyzing such multibody dynamics models with interval uncertainty, where the Galerkin projection method is adopted to compute the Legendre polynomial coefficients. The capacity of the Legendre polynomial inclusion function to alleviate the wrapping effect is proved by a mathematical example. Through sampling, the nonintrusive algorithm expresses the original multibody dynamics system with interval uncertainty as the deterministic differential algebraic equations, followed by calculation using the general numerical integration method. The response bounds at each time step are predicted using the truncated Legendre polynomial expansion. A benchmark test based on three methods is analyzed to demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Moreover, an artillery multibody dynamics model created in ADAMS/Solver can reproduce a suite of experimental results, and is then specifically investigated to illustrate the superiority of this method in large, complicated multibody dynamic systems.

[1]  W. Gao,et al.  Interval dynamic response analysis of vehicle-bridge interaction system with uncertainty , 2013 .

[2]  Dongbin Xiu,et al.  The Wiener-Askey Polynomial Chaos for Stochastic Differential Equations , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Sigrid Leyendecker,et al.  Fuzzy dynamics of multibody systems with polymorphic uncertainty in the material microstructure , 2019, Computational Mechanics.

[4]  Nedialko S. Nedialkov,et al.  Validated solutions of initial value problems for ordinary differential equations , 1999, Appl. Math. Comput..

[5]  Christian Soize,et al.  Rigid multibody system dynamics with uncertain rigid bodies , 2011, Multibody System Dynamics.

[6]  Zhe Wang,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics and chaotic control of a flexible multibody system with uncertain joint clearance , 2016 .

[7]  Han Ding,et al.  Interval finite element method for dynamic response of closed‐loop system with uncertain parameters , 2007 .

[8]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Modeling multibody systems with uncertainties. Part II: Numerical applications , 2006 .

[9]  Baizhan Xia,et al.  Interval analysis of acoustic field with uncertain-but-bounded parameters , 2012 .

[10]  Lei Wang,et al.  A radial basis function artificial neural network (RBF ANN) based method for uncertain distributed force reconstruction considering signal noises and material dispersion , 2020 .

[11]  Martin Berz,et al.  Efficient Control of the Dependency Problem Based on Taylor Model Methods , 1999, Reliab. Comput..

[12]  Nong Zhang,et al.  Dynamic computation of flexible multibody system with uncertain material properties , 2016 .

[13]  Nathalie Revol,et al.  Taylor models and floating-point arithmetic: proof that arithmetic operations are validated in COSY , 2005, J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program..

[14]  Xu Han,et al.  Transient waves in composite‐laminated plates with uncertain load and material property , 2008 .

[15]  Z. Qiu,et al.  Parameter perturbation method for dynamic responses of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters based on interval analysis , 2005 .

[16]  Dejie Yu,et al.  Modified sub-interval perturbation finite element method for 2D acoustic field prediction with large uncertain-but-bounded parameters , 2012 .

[17]  David Moens,et al.  A survey of non-probabilistic uncertainty treatment in finite element analysis , 2005 .

[18]  On using polynomial chaos for modeling uncertainty in acoustic propagation. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Martin Berz,et al.  SUPPRESSION OF THE WRAPPING EFFECT BY TAYLOR MODEL- BASED VERIFIED INTEGRATORS: LONG-TERM STABILIZATION BY PRECONDITIONING , 2011 .

[20]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  A polynomial chaos approach to the analysis of vehicle dynamics under uncertainty , 2012 .

[21]  Hong Hee Yoo,et al.  Dynamic analysis of multi-body systems considering probabilistic properties , 2005 .

[22]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Identification and prediction of stochastic dynamical systems in a polynomial chaos basis , 2005 .

[23]  M. Stadtherr,et al.  Validated solutions of initial value problems for parametric ODEs , 2007 .

[24]  Liqun Wang,et al.  Interval optimization for structural dynamic responses of an artillery system under uncertainty , 2020, Engineering Optimization.

[25]  Q. Tian,et al.  Dynamics of spatial rigid–flexible multibody systems with uncertain interval parameters , 2016 .

[26]  G. Alefeld,et al.  Interval analysis: theory and applications , 2000 .

[27]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Treating Uncertainties in Multibody Dynamic Systems Using a Polynomial Chaos Spectral Decomposition , 2004 .

[28]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  The time response of structures with bounded parameters and interval initial conditions , 2010 .

[29]  Carsten Proppe,et al.  A probabilistic approach for assessing the crosswind stability of ground vehicles , 2010 .

[30]  Thomas Gerstner,et al.  Dimension–Adaptive Tensor–Product Quadrature , 2003, Computing.

[31]  Lei Wang,et al.  An inverse method for distributed dynamic load identification of structures with interval uncertainties , 2019, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[32]  Antonello Monti,et al.  Dynamic Performance of a SCARA Robot Manipulator With Uncertainty Using Polynomial Chaos Theory , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[33]  Liping Chen,et al.  A Chebyshev interval method for nonlinear dynamic systems under uncertainty , 2013 .

[34]  W. Gao,et al.  Natural frequency and mode shape analysis of structures with uncertainty , 2007 .

[35]  I. Elishakoff,et al.  Antioptimization of structures with large uncertain-but-non-random parameters via interval analysis , 1998 .

[36]  Philip A. Voglewede,et al.  Automating the Derivation of the Equations of Motion of a Multibody Dynamic System With Uncertainty Using Polynomial Chaos Theory and Variational Work , 2019, Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics.

[37]  Z. Qiu,et al.  Non-probabilistic interval analysis method for dynamic response analysis of nonlinear systems with uncertainty , 2009 .

[38]  M A Strickland,et al.  A multi-platform comparison of efficient probabilistic methods in the prediction of total knee replacement mechanics , 2010, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[39]  Adrian Sandu,et al.  Modeling Multibody Systems with Uncertainties. Part I: Theoretical and Computational Aspects , 2006 .

[40]  C. W. Gear,et al.  Automatic integration of Euler-Lagrange equations with constraints , 1985 .

[41]  Liping Chen,et al.  Interval uncertain method for multibody mechanical systems using Chebyshev inclusion functions , 2013 .

[42]  Markus E. Lautenbacher,et al.  A 1996 analysis of the CP violating ratio ε′/ε , 1996 .

[43]  Z. Qiu,et al.  Comparison of dynamic response of structures with uncertain-but-bounded parameters using non-probabilistic interval analysis method and probabilistic approach , 2003 .