Varieties of update

This paper discusses three potential varieties of update: updates to the common ground, structuring updates, and updates that introduce discourse referents. These different types of update are used to model different aspects of natural language phenomena. Not-at-issue information directly updates the common ground. The illocutionary mood of a sentence structures the context. Other updates introduce discourse referents of various types, including propositional discourse referents for at-issue information. Distinguishing these types of update allows a unified treatment of a broad range of phenomena, including the grammatical evidentials found in Cheyenne (Algonquian) as well as English evidential parentheticals, appositives, and mood marking. An update semantics that can formalize all of these varieties of update is given, integrating the different kinds of semantic contributions into a single representation of meaning. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.2 BibTeX info

[1]  Sanford C. Goldberg Assertion and Belief , 2015 .

[2]  Matthew Stone,et al.  The Anaphoric Parallel Between Modality and Tense , 1997 .

[3]  Frank Veltman,et al.  Defaults in update semantics , 1996, J. Philos. Log..

[5]  Luís Moniz Pereira,et al.  On Indicative Conditionals , 2015, IWOST-1.

[6]  Craige Roberts Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .

[7]  Todor Koev,et al.  On the Information Status of Appositive Relative Clauses , 2011, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[8]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Formal methods in the study of language , 1983 .

[9]  Mandy Simons,et al.  Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition , 2007 .

[10]  Daniel Hardt,et al.  Centering in Dynamic Semantics , 1996, COLING.

[11]  E. McCready Varieties of conventional implicature , 2010 .

[12]  Jungmee Lee Evidentiality and its Interaction with Tense: Evidence from Korean , 2011 .

[13]  Francesca Del Gobbo On the syntax and semantics of appositive relative clauses , 2007 .

[14]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  On the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers , 1984 .

[15]  Matthew Stone,et al.  The reference argument of epistemic must , 1994 .

[16]  Reinhard Muskens,et al.  Tense and the logic of change , 1995 .

[17]  Christine A. Gunlogson True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English , 2003 .

[18]  Satoshi Ito,et al.  Proceedings From Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Salt) Xix (2009) , 2011 .

[19]  R. Nouwen On appositives and dynamic binding , 2007 .

[20]  I. I. N. Kamp Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation , 1996 .

[21]  H. Rullmann,et al.  Evidentials as epistemic modals: Evidence from St'át'imcets , 2008 .

[22]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Crossing the Appositive/At-issue Meaning Boundary , 2010 .

[23]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Formal methods in the study of language : [proceedings of the 3rd Amsterdam colloquium, 25-28.03.1980], part 2 , 1981 .

[24]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Attention! 'Might' in Inquisitive Semantics , 2009 .

[25]  David I. Beaver,et al.  What projects and why , 2010 .

[27]  Matthew Stone,et al.  Dynamic Discourse Referents for Tense and Modals , 1999 .

[28]  Eric McCready,et al.  What man does , 2008 .

[29]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  STRUCTURED NOMINAL AND MODAL REFERENCE , 2008 .

[30]  C. F. M. Vermeulen,et al.  Sequence semantics for dynamic predicate logic , 1993, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[31]  J. Ginzburg Interrogatives: questions, facts and dialogue , 1996 .

[32]  Judith Tonhauser,et al.  Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content , 2011 .

[33]  Kim B. Bruce,et al.  On Reacting to Assertions and Polar Questions , 2010, J. Semant..

[34]  Adrian Brasoveanu,et al.  Polarity particles and the anatomy of N-words , 2012 .

[35]  Sarah E. Murray A Hamblin Semantics for Evidentials , 2009 .

[36]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Semantik : ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung = Semantics : an international handbook of contemporary research , 1991 .

[37]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic predicate logic , 1991 .

[38]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  Discourse Referents , 1969, COLING.

[39]  C. L. Hamblin QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH , 1976 .

[40]  Sarah E. Murray Evidentiality and the structure of speech acts , 2010 .

[41]  William B. Starr,et al.  Conditionals, meaning and mood , 2010 .

[42]  Craige Roberts Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse , 1989 .

[43]  Martina Faller Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua , 2002 .

[44]  Maria Bittner,et al.  Time and modality without tenses or modals , 2011 .

[45]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  The Logic of Interrogation (classical version) , 1999 .

[46]  Nicholas Asher,et al.  Truth Conditional Discourse Semantics for Parentheticals , 2000, J. Semant..

[47]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[48]  Jacques Jayez,et al.  Parentheticals as Conventional Implicatures , 2004 .

[49]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics , 2009 .

[50]  G. Jonathan,et al.  Dynamics and the Semantics of Dialogue , 1996 .

[51]  Jan van Eijck,et al.  Incremental Dynamics , 2001, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[52]  P. Dekker Predicate logic with anaphora , 1994 .

[53]  Philippe Schlenker Supplements within a Unidimensional Semantics I: Scope , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[54]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[55]  M. Bittner Tense , Mood , and Centering * , 2013 .

[56]  Paul Portner,et al.  The Semantics of Imperatives within a Theory of Clause Types , 2004 .

[57]  E. Allyn Smith,et al.  Review of The Logic of Conventional Implicatures by Chris Potts , 2007 .

[58]  Kai von Fintel,et al.  An Opinionated Guide to Epistemic Modality , 2007 .

[59]  Uwe Reyle,et al.  From Discourse to Logic - Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.