Generalized failure envelope for caisson foundations in cohesive soil: Static and dynamic loading

Abstract The response of massive caisson foundations to combined vertical (N), horizontal (Q) and moment (M) loading is investigated parametrically by a series of three-dimensional finite element analyses. The study considers foundations in cohesive soil, with due consideration to the caisson-soil contact interface conditions. The ultimate limit states are presented by failure envelopes in dimensionless and normalized forms and the effects of the embedment ratio, vertical load and interface friction on the bearing capacity are studied in detail. Particular emphasis is given on the physical and geometrical interpretation of the kinematic mechanisms that accompany failure, with respect to the loading ratio M/Q. Exploiting the numerical results, analytical expressions are derived for the capacities under pure horizontal, moment and vertical loading, for certain conditions. For the case of fully bonded interface conditions, comparison is given with upper bound limit equilibrium solutions based on Brinch Hansen theory for the ultimate lateral soil reaction. A generalized closed-form expression for the failure envelope in M–Q–N space is then proposed and validated for all cases examined. It is shown that the incremental displacement vector of the caisson at failure follows an associated flow rule, with respect to the envelope, irrespective of: (a) the caisson geometry, and (b) the interface conditions. A simplified geometrical explanation and physical interpretation of the associativity in M-Q load space is also provided. Finally, the derived failure envelope is validated against low (0.67 Hz) and high frequency (5 Hz) dynamic loading tests and the role of radiation damping on the response of the caisson at near failure conditions is unraveled.

[1]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Shallow foundations subject to combined loadings , 1997 .

[2]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  ON THE BEARING CAPACITY OF SURFACE FOOTINGS ON SAND UNDER GENERAL PLANAR LOADS , 1993 .

[3]  Okky Ahmad Purwana,et al.  Numerical modelling of a hybrid skirted foundation under combined loading , 2012 .

[4]  M. Randolph,et al.  The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil , 1984 .

[5]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A comparison of the combined load behaviour of spudcan and caisson foundations on soft normally consolidated clay , 2004 .

[6]  Gijae Yun,et al.  The horizontal-moment capacity of embedded foundations in undrained soil , 2007 .

[7]  John P. Carter,et al.  Bearing capacity of strip and circular foundations on undrained clay subjected to eccentric loads , 2002 .

[8]  George Gazetas,et al.  Seismic response of bridge pier on rigid caisson foundation in soil stratum , 2008 .

[9]  Chris Martin.  Physical and numerical modelling of offshore foundations under combined loads , 1994 .

[10]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Effect of Strain Rate and Strain Softening on the Penetration Resistance of Spudcan Foundations on Clay , 2009 .

[11]  George Gazetas,et al.  Static and dynamic response of massive caisson foundations with soil and interface nonlinearities—validation and results , 2006 .

[12]  Alain Pecker,et al.  Cyclic macro‐element for soil–structure interaction: material and geometrical non‐linearities , 2001 .

[13]  Susan Gourvenec.  Bearing capacity under combined loading - a study of the effect of shear strength heterogeneity , 2004 .

[14]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the shape of failure envelopes for combined loading of strip and circular foundations on clay , 2003 .

[15]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  A complete three-dimensional failure envelope for shallow footings on sand , 1994 .

[16]  Mark Fraser Bransby,et al.  The undrained capacity of skirted strip foundations under combined loading , 2009 .

[17]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Experimental Investigations of the Response of Suction Caissons to Transient Combined Loading , 2004 .

[18]  Michael Pender,et al.  Seismic Design and Performance of Surface Foundations , 2007 .

[19]  Ioannis Anastasopoulos,et al.  Evidence of beneficial role of inclined piles: observations and summary of numerical analyses , 2008 .

[20]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: numerical modelling , 2001 .

[21]  Nikos Gerolymos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis of caisson-pier interaction , 2013 .

[22]  R. Nova,et al.  Settlements of shallow foundations on sand , 1991 .

[23]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Undrained Bearing Capacity of Deeply Buried Flat Circular Footings under General Loading , 2012 .

[24]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  Plastic response of circular footings on sand under general planar loading , 1999 .

[25]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: laboratory tests , 2000 .

[26]  C. O. Frederick,et al.  A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect , 2007 .

[27]  Nikos Gerolymos,et al.  On the seismic response of under-designed caisson foundations , 2013, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[28]  John P. Carter,et al.  Numerical studies of the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on cohesive soil subjected to combined loading , 2000 .

[29]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Field trials of suction caissons in clay for offshore wind turbine foundations , 2005 .

[30]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A plasticity model describing caisson behaviour in clay , 2006 .

[31]  Nikos Gerolymos,et al.  INSIGHT TO FAILURE MECHANISMS OF CAISSON FOUNDATIONS UNDER COMBINED LOADING: A MACRO-ELEMENT APPROACH , 2012 .

[32]  Nikos Gerolymos,et al.  Pushover and Seismic Response of Foundations on Stiff Clay: Analysis with P-Delta Effects , 2012 .

[33]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  THE DISPLACEMENT OF A MODEL RIGID SURFACE FOOTING ON DENSE SAND UNDER GENERAL PLANAR LOADING , 1995 .

[34]  Varun,et al.  A simplified model for lateral response of large diameter caisson foundations—Linear elastic formulation , 2009 .

[35]  George Gazetas,et al.  Winkler model for lateral response of rigid caisson foundations in linear soil , 2006 .

[36]  George Gazetas,et al.  Development of Winkler model for static and dynamic response of caisson foundations with soil and interface nonlinearities , 2006 .

[37]  Mark Randolph,et al.  THE EFFECT OF EMBEDMENT DEPTH ON THE UNDRAINED RESPONSE OF SKIRTED FOUNDATIONS TO COMBINED LOADING , 1999 .

[38]  N Gerolymos,et al.  Dynamic analysis of piles subjected to axial and lateral loading with emphasis on soil and interface nonlinearities , 2014 .

[39]  H. Abdul Razak,et al.  Finite element modeling of suction anchors under combined loading , 2009 .

[40]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  Undrained failure envelope for skirted foundations under general loading , 2011 .

[41]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  Failure envelopes for offshore shallow foundations under general loading , 2007 .

[42]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  A comparison of field and laboratory tests of caisson foundations in sand and clay , 2006 .

[43]  Lars Bo Ibsen,et al.  Undrained response of bucket foundations to moment loading , 2012 .

[44]  Guido Gottardi,et al.  Standardized sign conventions and notation for generally loaded foundations , 1997 .

[45]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Combined loading of skirted foundations , 1998 .

[46]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  Development and application of force resultant models describing jack-up foundation behaviour , 2004 .

[47]  齋藤 正人.  Effective seismic motion of caisson and pile foundation , 2001 .

[48]  H. Matlock.  Correlation for Design of Laterally Loaded Piles in Soft Clay , 1970 .

[49]  Mark Randolph,et al.  New Mechanism-Based Design Approach for Spudcan Foundations on Single Layer Clay , 2009 .

[50]  Nikos Gerolymos,et al.  Towards a seismic capacity design of caisson foundations supporting bridge piers , 2014 .

[51]  Konstantinos Karapiperis,et al.  Combined loading of caisson foundations in cohesive soil: Finite element versus Winkler modeling , 2014 .