Measuring social compliance performance in the global sustainable supply chain: an AHP approach

Abstract Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) has increasingly become an important operation task for business organizations in recent decades in orderto be positioned competitively within industry supply chain management. The economic, environmental, and social goals come from the threemajor dimensions of SSCM and they are derived fromcustomer and stakeholder requirements. The social compliance program (SCP)is a basic requirement established and aimsto evaluate suppliers and or business organizations’ SSCM implementation as foundation.An empirical checklist used to commonly use as a tool to evaluate suppliers’ performance in the field of social compliance, but the argument is that it is insufficientand approaches ambiguity when examiningthebusiness efforts of sustainable decisions. Today, for instance, less in-depth theoretical data are qualitativelyutilized for suppliers’ social compliance performanceevaluation. This paper represents a case study to illustrate the proposed SCP criteria used for evaluating and selecting sustainable global suppliers is practicable in field of meeting social compliance perspective. This study adopts the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methodology by using a multi-criteria decision framework to measure the SCP within SSCM. For comparison, we collected the relevant factors and alternatives through aquestionnaire collected from 137 surveys that were submitted by various business units from a global sports brand company, whose suppliers are located in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Vietnam, and Cambodia. It appears that, in general, the concept of management involvement, the launch of a management system, communication within collaboration, a training mechanism, and a transparent attitude and performance action are critical elements that lead business decisions and supply chain sustainability. We present reliable factors thatcontribute to the framework decision model and which are applicable to business entities for effectively evaluatingand selectingsustainable suppliers. Moreover, we find that the value mechanism applied to suppliers can also enhance the motivation of the business model and to meet the goal dimension of SSCM.

[1]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[2]  Ismail Erol,et al.  A new fuzzy multi-criteria framework for measuring sustainability performance of a supply chain , 2011 .

[3]  Wen-Hsien Tsai,et al.  A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value-chain structure , 2009 .

[4]  Helena Shanahan,et al.  Green supply chains and the missing link between environmental information and practice , 2009 .

[5]  J. Linton,et al.  Sustainable supply chains: An introduction , 2007 .

[6]  Louis Y.Y. Lu,et al.  Environmental principles applicable to green supplier evaluation by using multi-objective decision analysis , 2007 .

[7]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN OPERATIONAL PRACTICES AND PERFORMANCE AMONG EARLY ADOPTERS OF GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN CHINESE MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES , 2004 .

[8]  Kamal M. Al‐Subhi Al‐Harbi,et al.  Application of the AHP in project management , 2001 .

[9]  P. Rao,et al.  Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance , 2005 .

[10]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey , 2004 .

[11]  Donald J. Bowersox,et al.  Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply Chain Process , 1974 .

[12]  Jukka Korpela,et al.  A customer oriented approach to warehouse network evaluation and design , 1999 .

[13]  Hau L. Lee Don't tweak your supply chain: Rethink it end to end , 2010 .

[14]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[15]  V. Yu,et al.  Identifying key factors affecting consumers' choice of wealth management services: an AHP approach , 2011 .

[16]  Giannis T. Tsoulfas,et al.  Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation , 2006 .

[17]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[18]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Portfolio selection through hierarchies* , 1980 .

[19]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management , 2008 .

[20]  Bojan Srdjevic,et al.  Linking analytic hierarchy process and social choice methods to support group decision-making in water management , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Chih-Hsing Chu,et al.  Economical green product design based on simplified computer-aided product structure variation , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[22]  Ben Hua,et al.  Supply chain optimization of continuous process industries with sustainability considerations , 2000 .

[23]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  A hybrid approach to supplier selection for the maintenance of a competitive supply chain , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Are supplier selection criteria going green? Case studies of companies in Brazil , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[26]  Zelda B. Zabinsky,et al.  A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process , 2011 .

[27]  F. Chan,et al.  Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach , 2007 .