NGO online disclosures index in the presence of auxiliary information

This study highlights the need for analysis of online disclosure practices followed by non-governmental organizations; furthermore, it justifies the crucial role of potential correlates of online disclosure practices followed by non-governmental organizations. We propose a novel index for analyzing the extent of online disclosure of non-governmental organizations (NGO). Using the information stored in an auxiliary variable, we propose a new estimator for gauging the average value of the proposed index. Our approach relies on the use of two factors: imperfect ranked-set sampling procedure to link the auxiliary variable with the study variable, and an NGO disclosure index under simple random sampling that uses information only about the study variable. Relative efficiency of the proposed index is compared with the conventional estimator for the population average under the imperfect ranked-set sampling scheme. Mathematical conditions required for retaining the efficiency of the proposed index, in comparison to the imperfect ranked set sampling estimator, are derived. Numerical scrutiny of the relative efficiency, in response to the input variables, indicates; if the variance of the NGO disclosure index is less than the variance of the estimator under imperfect ranked set sampling, then the proposed index is universally efficient compared to the estimator under imperfect ranked set sampling. If the condition on variances is unmet, even then the proposed estimator remains efficient if majority of the NGO share online data on the auxiliary variable. This work can facilitate nonprofit regulation in the countries where most of the non-governmental organizations maintain their websites.

[1]  A. Prakash,et al.  Accountability.org: Online Disclosures by U.S. Nonprofits , 2015 .

[2]  Carmen Caba Pérez,et al.  Drivers for the proactive online disclosure of information in the NGO sector: the Colombian case , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[3]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  The Effect of Imperfect Judgment Rankings on Properties of Procedures Based on the Ranked-Set Samples Analog of the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon Statistic , 1994 .

[4]  Jesse Frey,et al.  New imperfect rankings models for ranked set sampling , 2007 .

[5]  Antonino Vaccaro,et al.  Corporate dynamic transparency: the new ICT-driven ethics? , 2009, Ethics and Information Technology.

[6]  Trade.,et al.  Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization ; General Agreement on Trade in Serives ; Schedules , 1994 .

[7]  Carmen Marcuello,et al.  NGOs, corporate social responsibility, and social accountability: Inditex vs. Clean Clothes , 2007 .

[8]  L. Jordan,et al.  NGO Accountability : Politics, Principles and Innovations , 2006 .

[9]  B. Kingsbury The Concept of ‘Law’ in Global Administrative Law , 2009 .

[10]  Usman Qamar,et al.  HCF-CRS: A Hybrid Content based Fuzzy Conformal Recommender System for providing recommendations with confidence , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  P. Yu,et al.  Regression estimator in ranked set sampling. , 1997, Biometrics.

[12]  Saeed-Ul Hassan,et al.  Deep context of citations using machine-learning models in scholarly full-text articles , 2018, Scientometrics.

[13]  Naima Iltaf,et al.  HRS-CE: A hybrid framework to integrate content embeddings in recommender systems for cold start items , 2018, J. Comput. Sci..

[14]  John Shimkus,et al.  DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY , 2001 .

[15]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  Meta-Knowledge Annotation of Bio-Events , 2010, LREC.

[16]  A. Al-Hossain,et al.  A note on a difference-type estimator for population mean under two-phase sampling design , 2016, SpringerPlus.

[17]  Javid Shabbir,et al.  Generalized exponential-type ratio-cum ratio estimators of population mean in ranked set and stratified ranked set sampling , 2017 .

[18]  J. Shabbir,et al.  A new disclosure index for Non-Governmental Organizations , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  A. Prakash,et al.  National Styles of NGO Regulation , 2014 .

[20]  Alnoor Ebrahim Accountability In Practice: Mechanisms for NGOs , 2003 .

[21]  Mursala Khan Improvement in Estimating the Finite Population Mean Under Maximum and Minimum Values in Double Sampling Scheme , 2015 .

[22]  James Mathewson,et al.  Audience, Relevance, and Search: Targeting Web Audiences with Relevant Content , 2010 .

[23]  A. Macallum The University of Toronto , 1907, Nature.

[24]  Who Will Watch the Watchdogs?: International Human Rights Nongovernmental Organizations and the Case for Regulation , 2005 .

[25]  Erla Thrandardottir Evaluating Transnational NGOs: Legitimacy, Accountability, Representation , 2014 .

[26]  M. R. Mickey,et al.  Some Finite Population Unbiased Ratio and Regression Estimators , 1959 .

[27]  Alnoor Ebrahim Accountability Myopia: Losing Sight of Organizational Learning , 2005 .

[28]  P. Rao,et al.  18 Ratio and regression estimators , 1988 .

[29]  David C. Kirsch Accountability in Children's Development Organizations , 2013 .

[30]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[31]  Cem Kadilar,et al.  Ratio estimators in simple random sampling , 2004, Appl. Math. Comput..

[32]  Sophia Ananiadou,et al.  News search using discourse analytics , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[33]  Peter Uvin,et al.  Think Large and Act Small: Toward a New Paradigm for NGO Scaling Up , 2000 .

[34]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[35]  C. Adams,et al.  CORPORATE SOCIAL REPORTING PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPE: LEGITIMATING CORPORATE BEHAVIOUR?☆☆☆ , 1998 .

[36]  M. V. Meerhaeghe,et al.  The World Trade Organization , 2021, Essentials of WTO Law.

[37]  Zhengyan Lin,et al.  Enhancing the Mean Ratio Estimators for Estimating Population Mean Using Non-Conventional Location Parameters , 2016 .

[38]  Omer Ozturk Combining multi‐observer information in partially rank‐ordered judgment post‐stratified and ranked set samples , 2013 .