Systematic analysis of xanthomonads (Xanthomonas spp.) associated with pepper and tomato lesions.

The taxonomy and evolutionary relationships among members of the genus Xanthomonas associated with tomato and pepper have been a matter of considerable controversy since their original description in 1921. These bacteria, which are a major affliction of tomato and pepper crops in warm and humid regions, were originally described as a single species, but subsequent research has shown the existence of at least two genetic groups differentiated by physiological, biochemical and pathological characteristics. This work synthesizes the findings from several approaches, including pathogenicity tests, enzymic activity, restriction fragment analysis of the entire genome, DNA-DNA hybridization and RNA sequence comparisons based on a 2097 base sequence comprising the 16S rRNA gene, the intergenic spacer located between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes and a small region of the 23S rRNA gene. Within the group of xanthomonads pathogenic on pepper and tomato four distinct phenotypic groups exist, of which three form distinct genomic species. These include Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria (A and C group), Xanthomonas vesicatoria (B group) and Xanthomonas gardneri (D group). On the basis of phenotypic and genotypic differences between A- and C-group strains, the C strains should be considered as a subspecies within Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria.

[1]  Jan LW Rademaker,et al.  Multiphasic analysis of xanthomonads causing bacterial spot disease on tomato and pepper in the Caribbean and central america: evidence for common lineages within and between countries. , 1999, Phytopathology.

[2]  J. Swings,et al.  Comparison of 16S ribosomal DNA sequences of all Xanthomonas species. , 1997, International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology.

[3]  Jeffrey B. Jones,et al.  Diversity of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in tomato and pepper fields of Mexico , 1996 .

[4]  H. Philippe,et al.  16S rRNA and 16S to 23S internal transcribed spacer sequence analyses reveal inter- and intraspecific Bifidobacterium phylogeny. , 1996, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[5]  J. Swings,et al.  Reclassification of Xanthomonas , 1995 .

[6]  Jeffrey B. Jones,et al.  A third tomato race of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria , 1995 .

[7]  R. Overbeek,et al.  The winds of (evolutionary) change: breathing new life into microbiology. , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  D. Egel,et al.  Genetic analysis of hrp-related DNA sequences of Xanthomonas campestris strains causing diseases of citrus , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  A. A. Benedict,et al.  Two genetically diverse groups of strains are included in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. , 1994 .

[11]  Jeffrey B. Jones,et al.  Proteins unique to phenotypically distinct groups of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria revealed by silver staining , 1994 .

[12]  A. A. Benedict,et al.  Physiological, chemical, serological, and pathogenic analyses of a worldwide collection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strains. , 1994 .

[13]  M. Schroth,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness of 21 strains of Xanthomonas species and pathovars , 1993 .

[14]  G. Fox,et al.  How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. , 1992, International journal of systematic bacteriology.

[15]  J. Graham,et al.  Genomic Relatedness of Xanthomonas campestris Strains Causing Diseases of Citrus , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  J. Swings,et al.  Towards An Improved Taxonomy of Xanthomonas , 1990 .

[17]  M. Schroth,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness of 24 xanthomonad strains representing 23 Xanthomonas campestris pathovars and Xanthomonas fragariae. , 1990 .

[18]  Takayuki Ezaki,et al.  Fluorometric Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Deoxyribonucleic Acid Hybridization in Microdilution Wells as an Alternative to Membrane Filter Hybridization in which Radioisotopes Are Used To Determine Genetic Relatedness among Bacterial Strains , 1989 .

[19]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[20]  M. Nei Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[21]  M. Nei,et al.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  C. Panagopoulos,et al.  A proposed nomenclature and classification for plant pathogenic bacteria , 1978 .

[23]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.

[24]  M. Starr,et al.  Taxonomic Clarification of Xanthomonas vesicatoria Based upon Host Specificity, Bacteriophage Sensitivity, and Cultural Characteristics , 1964 .

[25]  D. W. Dowson On the systematic position and generic names of the Gram negative bacterial plant pathogens. , 1939 .

[26]  M. W. Gardner,et al.  Bacterial spot of Tomato and Pepper. , 1923 .

[27]  E. M. Doidge A TOMATO CANKER , 1921 .

[28]  M. W. Gardner,et al.  Bacterial spot of tomato. , 1921 .