A novel approach to an old problem: Analysis of systematic errors in two models of recognition memory
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[2] Caren M Rotello,et al. Theremember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[3] Michael R. Healy,et al. Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: evidence from receiver operating characteristics. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[4] Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al. Recognition memory ROCs and the dual-process signal-detection model: Comment on Glanzer, Kim, Hilford, and Adams (1999). , 1999 .
[5] R. Ratcliff,et al. Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.
[6] Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al. Sparing of the familiarity component of recognition memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[7] John T. Wixted,et al. The familiarity/recollection distinction does not illuminate medial temporal lobe function: response to Montaldi and Mayes , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] Robert T. Knight,et al. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[9] Marc W Howard,et al. Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: evidence from modeling and receiver operating characteristic curves. , 2006, Psychology and aging.
[10] L. Squire,et al. Hippocampal damage impairs recognition memory broadly, affecting both parameters in two prominent models of memory , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[11] R. Clark,et al. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[12] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[13] Nikolai Axmacher,et al. Using state-trace analysis to dissociate the functions of the human hippocampus and perirhinal cortex in recognition memory , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[14] Andrew R. Mayes,et al. Familiarity, recollection and medial temporal lobe function: an unresolved issue , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[15] J T Wixted,et al. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[16] J. Wixted,et al. A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. , 2010, Psychological review.
[17] Charan Ranganath,et al. Recollection, familiarity and memory strength: confusion about confounds , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[18] Sabrina M. Tom,et al. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes , 2004, Neuropsychologia.
[19] Scott D. Slotnick,et al. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[20] John T Wixted,et al. The Hippocampus Supports Both Recollection and Familiarity When Memories Are Strong , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[21] Murray Glanzer,et al. Six regularities of source recognition. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[22] M. Rugg,et al. Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[23] M. Glanzer,et al. Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. , 1999 .
[24] H. Eichenbaum,et al. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.
[25] Roger Ratcliff,et al. Assessing model mimicry using the parametric bootstrap , 2004 .
[26] A P Yonelinas,et al. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: a formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] H Pashler,et al. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. , 2000, Psychological review.
[28] A. Yonelinas,et al. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[29] L. Squire,et al. The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] T. Zandt. ROC curves and confidence judgments in recognition memory. , 2000 .
[31] John T Wixted,et al. Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[32] J. Wixted. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.
[33] C. L. Raye,et al. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999). , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[34] A. Yonelinas. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] John T. Wixted,et al. Confusion abounds about confounds: response to Diana and Ranganath , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[36] R. Ratcliff,et al. Mixing strong and weak targets provides no evidence against the unequal-variance explanation of ʐROC slope: a comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010). , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[37] Lynne M. Reder,et al. Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.