Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes?

Abstract The time course of learners’ processing of a complex animation was studied using a dynamic diagram of a piano mechanism. Over successive repetitions of the material, two forms of cueing (standard colour cueing and anti-cueing) were administered either before or during the animated segment of the presentation. An uncued group and two other control conditions were also employed. Development of an internal representation of the movements depicted in the animation was evaluated through participant demonstrations of the mechanism’s operation on a replica piano mechanism. Eye tracking (fixation lengths) indicated that overall, conventional visuospatially-based cueing was largely ineffective for directing attention across the presentations of the animation. Demonstration scores from cued animations were no better than those produced from the uncued version. Cue obedience for standard colour cueing was initially superior to that for anti-cues but fell away after the animation’s first exposure. Contrary to expectations, there was no difference in cue obedience for cueing applied before or during animation of the display. The findings suggest that alternatives to visuospatial cues are needed to help learners process complex animations more effectively.

[1]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design , 2007 .

[2]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  An Eye Tracking Comparison of External Pointing Cues and Internal Continuous Cues in Learning with Complex Animations , 2010 .

[3]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[4]  Richard K. Lowe The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning of Meteorology , 2005 .

[5]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Constructing and Revising Mental Models of a Mechanical System: The role of domain knowledge in understanding external visualizations , 2004 .

[6]  Malcolm L. Fleming,et al.  Instructional Message Design: Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences , 1993 .

[7]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[8]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Franck Amadieu,et al.  The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Rolf Ploetzner,et al.  Developing and evaluating a strategy for learning from animations , 2010 .

[12]  D. Simons,et al.  The dynamic events that capture visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ (2005) , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Design factors for educationally effective animations and simulations , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[14]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning , 2004 .

[15]  Béatrice S. Hasler,et al.  Learner Control, Cognitive Load and Instructional Animation , 2007 .

[16]  Richard K. Lowe,et al.  A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics , 2008 .

[17]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[18]  F. Paas,et al.  Towards a Framework for Attention Cueing in Instructional Animations: Guidelines for Research and Design , 2009 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  The instructive animation: helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning , 1992 .

[20]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Manipulatable Models for Investigating Processing of Dynamic Diagrams , 2010, Diagrams.

[21]  Richard K. Lowe Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[22]  Paul Lefrere,et al.  Do you need that second color? , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[23]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[24]  K. Dieussaert,et al.  Proceedings of the 26th annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2004 .

[25]  Jean-Michel Boucheix,et al.  Learning from Animated Diagrams: How Are Mental Models Built? , 2008, Diagrams.

[26]  R. Abrams,et al.  Motion Onset Captures Attention , 2003, Psychological science.

[27]  Jacques D. Fleuriot,et al.  Diagrammatically-Driven Formal Verification of Web-Services Composition , 2012, Diagrams.

[28]  Hanne Pedersen,et al.  Learning with animation , 2011 .

[29]  M. Hegarty Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions , 2004 .

[30]  F. Paas,et al.  Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? , 2010 .

[31]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Ric Lowe,et al.  Learning from animation: Where to look, when to look , 2008 .

[33]  Fred Paas,et al.  Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The role of presentation speed , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[35]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .