Building energy retrofit index for policy making and decision support at regional and national scales

The vast data collected since the enforcement of building energy labelling in Italy has provided valuable information that is useful for planning the future of building energy efficiency. However, the indicators provided through energy certificates are not suitable to support decisions, which target building energy retrofit in a regional scale. Considering the bias of the energy performance index toward a building’s shape, decisions based on this index will favor buildings with a specific geometric characteristics. This study tends to overcome this issue by introducing a new indicator, tailored to rank buildings based on retrofitable characteristics. The proposed framework is validated by a case study, in which a large dataset of office buildings are assigned with the new index. Results indicate that the proposed indicator succeeds to extract a single index, which is representative of all building characteristics subject to energy retrofit. A new labeling procedure is also compared with the conventional classification of buildings. It is observed that the proposed labels properly partitions the dataset, according to buildings’ potential to undergo energy retrofit.

[1]  S. Banfi,et al.  Willingness to pay for energy-saving measures in residential buildings , 2007 .

[2]  Paola Caputo,et al.  Evaluation of the space heating need in residential buildings at territorial scale: The case of Canton Ticino (CH) , 2017 .

[3]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.

[4]  Luis M. López-González,et al.  Update of energy performance certificates in the residential sector and scenarios that consider the impact of automation, control and management systems: A case study of La Rioja , 2016 .

[5]  Henk Visscher,et al.  Theoretical vs. actual energy consumption of labelled dwellings in the Netherlands: Discrepancies and policy implications , 2013 .

[6]  H. Bourlard,et al.  Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition , 1988, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders , 2008, ICML '08.

[8]  Richard Bull,et al.  The use of building energy certificates to reduce energy consumption in European public buildings. , 2012 .

[9]  William Chung,et al.  Review of building energy-use performance benchmarking methodologies , 2011 .

[10]  Tim Johansson,et al.  Development of an energy atlas for renovation of the multifamily building stock in Sweden , 2017 .

[11]  Mehdi Farsi,et al.  Risk aversion and willingness to pay for energy efficient systems in rental apartments , 2010 .

[12]  N. Zhou,et al.  Overview of current energy-efficiency policies in China , 2010 .

[13]  Kristian Fabbri Planning a Regional Energy System in Association with the Creation of Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), Statistical Analysis and Energy Efficiency Measures: An Italian Case Study , 2013 .

[14]  Sean Lyons,et al.  The Value of Domestic Building Energy Efficiency – Evidence from Ireland , 2012 .

[15]  Knut Holtan Sørensen,et al.  How energy efficiency fails in the building industry , 2009 .

[16]  Brian Norton,et al.  The statistical relevance and effect of assuming pessimistic default overall thermal transmittance coefficients on dwelling energy performance certification quality in Ireland , 2016, Energy and Buildings.

[17]  George S. Stavrakakis,et al.  On the Application of Clustering Techniques for Office Buildings' Energy and Thermal Comfort Classification , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[18]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .

[19]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Modeling energy refurbishment scenarios for the Hellenic residential building stock towards the 2020 & 2030 targets , 2016 .

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Reducing the Dimensionality of Data with Neural Networks , 2006, Science.

[21]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings , 2014 .

[22]  Ilaria Ballarini,et al.  Application of energy rating methods to the existing building stock: Analysis of some residential buildings in Turin , 2009 .

[23]  Sang Hoon Lee,et al.  Commercial Building Energy Saver: An energy retrofit analysis toolkit , 2015 .

[24]  Tina Fawcett,et al.  Energy efficiency and the policy mix , 2016 .

[25]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Development of a dynamic operational rating system in energy performance certificates for existing buildings: Geostatistical approach and data-mining technique , 2015 .

[26]  Gerardo Maria Mauro,et al.  Artificial neural networks to predict energy performance and retrofit scenarios for any member of a building category: A novel approach , 2017 .

[27]  Trivess Moore,et al.  Size matters:house size and thermal efficiency as policy strategies to reduce net emissions of new developments , 2012 .

[28]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  On the use of an energy certification database to create indicators for energy planning purposes: Application in northern Italy , 2015 .

[29]  M. N. Assimakopoulos,et al.  Using intelligent clustering techniques to classify the energy performance of school buildings , 2007 .

[30]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  A methodology for evaluating the potential energy savings of retrofitting residential building stocks , 2012 .

[31]  Constantinos A. Balaras,et al.  Mapping the energy performance of hellenic residential buildings from EPC (energy performance certificate) data , 2016 .

[32]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  Building age as an indicator for energy consumption , 2015 .

[33]  Paul Ekins,et al.  The impact of EU policies on energy use in and the evolution of the UK built environment , 2008 .

[34]  Martin Fodslette Møller,et al.  A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning , 1993, Neural Networks.

[35]  Luis M. López-González,et al.  Energy performance certificates as tools for energy planning in the residential sector. The case of La Rioja (Spain). , 2016 .

[36]  W. L. Lee,et al.  Regulatory and voluntary approaches for enhancing building energy efficiency , 2004 .

[37]  Giuliano Dall'O',et al.  A methodology for the energy performance classification of residential building stock on an urban scale , 2012 .

[38]  F. Fuerst,et al.  The Impact of Energy Performance Certificates on the Rental and Capital Values of Commercial Property Assets: Some Preliminary Evidence from the UK , 2011 .

[39]  Emile J.L. Chappin,et al.  Modelling decisions on energy-efficient renovations: A review , 2014 .

[40]  Edwin H.W. Chan,et al.  Success factors of energy performance contracting (EPC) for sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit (BEER) of hotel buildings in China , 2011 .

[41]  H. Wallbaum,et al.  Socio-economic impact of renovation and energy retrofitting of the Gothenburg building stock , 2016 .

[42]  Michael D. Sohn,et al.  Big-data for building energy performance: Lessons from assembling a very large national database of building energy use , 2015 .

[43]  Kevin R Grosskopf,et al.  Benchmarking energy performance of building envelopes through a selective residual-clustering approach using high dimensional dataset , 2014 .

[44]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review of benchmarking, rating and labelling concepts within the framework of building energy certification schemes , 2009 .

[45]  M. Jakob Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments: The case of the Swiss residential sector , 2006 .

[46]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks and Learning Machines , 2010 .

[47]  Hyo Seon Park,et al.  Development of a new energy efficiency rating system for existing residential buildings , 2014 .

[48]  Michael D. Sohn,et al.  A regression-based approach to estimating retrofit savings using the Building Performance Database , 2016 .

[49]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[50]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[51]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Stacked Denoising Autoencoders: Learning Useful Representations in a Deep Network with a Local Denoising Criterion , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[52]  Bing Liu,et al.  U.S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the National Building Stock , 2011 .

[53]  Jan Carmeliet,et al.  Multiobjective optimisation of energy systems and building envelope retrofit in a residential community , 2017 .

[54]  T. Caliński,et al.  A dendrite method for cluster analysis , 1974 .

[55]  Priyadarsini Rajagopalan,et al.  Progress on building energy labelling techniques , 2012 .

[56]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Greedy Layer-Wise Training of Deep Networks , 2006, NIPS.

[57]  Fu Xiao,et al.  Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings , 2012 .

[58]  Xavier García Casals,et al.  Analysis of building energy regulation and certification in Europe: Their role, limitations and differences , 2006 .

[59]  David Velázquez,et al.  Revisiting energy efficiency fundamentals , 2012, Energy Efficiency.

[60]  George Stavrakakis,et al.  Review on methodologies for energy benchmarking, rating and classification of buildings , 2011 .

[61]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[62]  Zhengwei Li,et al.  Methods for benchmarking building energy consumption against its past or intended performance: An overview , 2014 .

[63]  Ali M. Malkawi,et al.  A new methodology for building energy performance benchmarking: An approach based on intelligent clustering algorithm , 2014 .

[64]  Hermann Amecke,et al.  The impact of energy performance certificates: A survey of German home owners , 2012 .

[65]  Carsten Nathani,et al.  Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: The effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations , 2007 .