Image Quality of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator System Designed for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Environment

Background—Recently, magnetic resonance (MR)–conditional implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) systems have become available. However, associated cardiac MR image (MRI) quality is unknown. The goal was to evaluate the image quality performance of various cardiac MR sequences in a multicenter trial of patients implanted with an MR-conditional ICD system. Methods and Results—The Evera-MRI trial enrolled 275 patients in 42 centers worldwide. There were 263 patients implanted with an Evera-MRI single- or dual-chamber ICD and randomized to controls (n=88) and MRI (n=175), 156 of whom underwent a protocol-required MRI (9–12 weeks post implant). Steady-state-free-precession (SSFP) and fast-gradient-echo (FGE) sequences were acquired in short-axis and horizontal long-axis orientations. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of image quality was performed by using a 7-point scale (grades 1–3: good quality, grades 6–7: nondiagnostic) and measuring ICD- and lead-related artifact size. Good to moderate image quality (grades 1–5) was obtained in 53% and 74% of SSFP and FGE acquisitions, respectively, covering the left ventricle, and in 69% and 84%, respectively, covering the right ventricle. Odds for better image quality were greater for right ventricle versus left ventricle (odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–2.2; P<0.0001) and greater for FGE versus SSFP (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5–4.8; P<0.0001). Compared with SSFP, ICD-related artifacts on FGE were smaller (141±65 versus 75±57 mm, respectively; P<0.0001). Lead artifacts were much smaller than ICD artifacts (P<0.0001). Conclusions—FGE yields good to moderate quality in 74% of left ventricle and 84% of right ventricle acquisitions and performs better than SSFP in patients with an MRI-conditional ICD system. In these patients, cardiac MRI can offer diagnostic information in most cases. Clinical Trial Registration—URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02117414.

[1]  M. Turakhia,et al.  Utilization and likelihood of radiologic diagnostic imaging in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Matthias Stuber,et al.  Single centre experience of the application of self navigated 3D whole heart cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the assessment of cardiac anatomy in congenital heart disease , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[3]  M. Gold,et al.  Full-Body MRI in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: Primary Results of a Randomized Study. , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  M. Hansen,et al.  Optimized protocols for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with thoracic metallic implants , 2015, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  S. Wolff,et al.  MRI scanning in patients with new and existing CapSureFix Novus 5076 pacemaker leads: randomized trial results. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[6]  M. Gold,et al.  Preclinical evaluation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator developed for magnetic resonance imaging use. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[7]  David Grodzki,et al.  Quiet Submillimeter MR Imaging of the Lung Is Feasible with a PETRA Sequence at 1.5 T. , 2015, Radiology.

[8]  M. Stuber,et al.  Compressed sensing single-breath-hold CMR for fast quantification of LV function, volumes, and mass. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[9]  L. Florack,et al.  Functional imaging of murine hearts using accelerated self-gated UTE cine MRI , 2014, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[10]  E. Kanal,et al.  Impact of the Advisa MRI pacing system on the diagnostic quality of cardiac MR images and contraction patterns of cardiac muscle during scans: Advisa MRI randomized clinical multicenter study results. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[11]  Jiang Du,et al.  MR imaging near metal with undersampled 3D radial UTE‐MAVRIC sequences , 2013, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  J. Schwitter,et al.  Superior diagnostic performance of perfusion-cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus SPECT to detect coronary artery disease: The secondary endpoints of the multicenter multivendor MR-IMPACT II (Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary Artery Disease Trial) , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[13]  E. Nagel,et al.  Validation of dynamic 3-dimensional whole heart magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging against fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  H. Halperin,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Artifacts on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Patients With Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging by CMR provides strong prognostic value to cardiac events regardless of patient's sex. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  A. Arai,et al.  Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2011, European heart journal.

[17]  A. van Rossum,et al.  Flow measurement by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multi-centre multi-vendor study of background phase offset errors that can compromise the accuracy of derived regurgitant or shunt flow measurements , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[18]  E. Nagel,et al.  EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) registry: results of the German pilot phase. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Peter Boesiger,et al.  Left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with left bundle branch block and patients after myocardial infarction: integration of mechanics and viability by cardiac magnetic resonance. , 2009, European heart journal.

[20]  Kim Butts,et al.  Reduction of blurring in view angle tilting MRI , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  E. Fleck,et al.  Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady‐state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[24]  W. Conover Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions , 1974 .

[25]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .