Technology transfer infrastructures: Some lessons from experiences in Europe, the US and Japan

Abstract In many regions in Europe, the US and East Asia technology transfer infrastructures have been set up to support endogenous potential by encouraging the diffusion of new technologies from higher education institutes (HEIs) and large firms to small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs). However, many studies have shown that business partners such as customers and suppliers are the most important partners for the stimulation of the innovativeness of SMEs. HEIs and transfer agencies are given a very low rank in these studies. These results have led to doubts about the usefulness of these institutions for regional economic development. However, some transfer infrastructures in Europe, the US and Japan have been partially able to circumvent deficiencies of traditional transfer agencies. The article aims at learning from experiences of these infrastructures that support the linkage of HEIs and public research establishments with SMEs. The main three research questions are. What are the deficiencies of mos...

[1]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  European technology policy evolution: convergence towards SMEs and regional technology transfer , 1992 .

[2]  Philip Shapira,et al.  Evaluating industrial modernization: Introduction to the theme issue , 1996 .

[3]  Gernot Grabher.  Lob der Verschwendung: Redundanz in der Regionalentwicklung ; ein sozioökonomisches Plädoyer , 1994 .

[4]  Philip Shapira.  Modernizing small manufacturers in Japan: The role of local public technology centers , 1992 .

[5]  A. Gibb.  Key Factors in the Design Of Policy Support for the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Development Process , 1993 .

[6]  Melvin M. Mark,et al.  Issues and perspectives on evaluating manufacturing modernization programs , 1996 .

[7]  R. Hassink,et al.  Technology networking in border regions: Case study of the Euregion Maas‐Rhine , 1995 .

[8]  Frank Pyke,et al.  Small firms, technical services and inter-firm cooperation , 1994 .

[9]  Kevin Morgan.  Reversing Attrition: The Auto Cluster in Baden-Württemberg , 1999 .

[10]  R. Hassink.  Technology transfer agencies and regional economic development , 1996 .

[11]  Philip Shapira,et al.  New Technology Adoption in West Virginia : Implications for Manufacturing Modernization Policies , 1996 .

[12]  David Charles,et al.  Technology Transfer in Europe: Public and Private Networks , 1992 .

[13]  E. Oldsman.  Does manufacturing extension matter? An evaluation of the industrial technology extension service in New York☆ , 1996 .

[14]  Klaus Semlinger.  Economic development and industrial policy in Baden — Württemberg: Small firms in a benevolent environment , 1993 .

[15]  Dermot O'Doherty,et al.  Globalisation, networking, and small firm innovation , 1995 .

[16]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 1991 .

[17]  Philip Shapira,et al.  New public infrastructures for small firm industral modernization in the USA , 1995 .

[18]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Current practices in the evaluation of US industrial modernization programs , 1996 .

[19]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  The survival of the gatekeeper , 1994 .

[20]  R. Oakey,et al.  Business information and regional economic development: some conceptual observations , 1993 .

[21]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe , 1991 .

[22]  P. Shapira.  Modernizing Small Manufacturers in the United States and Japan: Public Technological Infrastructures and Strategies , 1996 .

[23]  D. Luria,et al.  Performance benchmarking and measuring program impacts on customers: lessons from the Midwest Manufacturing Technology Center , 1996 .