In this article, Professor Frischmann combines a number of current debates across many disciplinary lines, all of which examine from different perspectives whether certain resources should be managed through a regime of private property or through a regime of open access. Frischmann develops and applies a theory that demonstrates there are strong economic arguments for managing and sustaining openly accessible infrastructure. The approach he takes differs from conventional analyses in that he focuses extensively on demand-side considerations and fully explores how infrastructure resources generate value for consumers and society. As a result, the theory brings into focus the social value of common infrastructure, and strongly suggests that the benefits of open access (costs of restricted access) are significantly greater than reflected in current debates. Frischmann's infrastructure theory ultimately ties together different strands of legal and economic thought pertaining to natural resources such as lakes, traditional infrastructure such as road systems, what antitrust theorists describe as essential facilities, basic scientific research, and the Internet. His theory has significant potential to reframe a number of important debates within intellectual property, cyberlaw, telecommunications, and many other areas. Note: Professor Lawrence Lessig will publish a Reply titled Re-Marking the Progress in Frischmann in the same edition of the Minnesota Law Review.
[1]
Michael K. Powell,et al.
Preserving Internet Freedom: Guiding Principles for the Industry
,
2004,
J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.
[2]
Rebecca S. Eisenberg,et al.
Public Research and Private Development: Patents and Technology Transfer in Government-Sponsored Research
,
1996
.
[3]
P. David.
The Evolving Accidental Information Super‐Highway
,
2001
.
[4]
David D. Clark,et al.
Rethinking the design of the Internet
,
2001,
ACM Trans. Internet Techn..
[5]
Jay P. Kesan,et al.
Fool Us Once Shame on You - Fool Us Twice Shame on Us: What We Can Learn from the Privatizations of the Internet Backbone Network and the Domain Name System
,
2001
.
[6]
Tim Wu,et al.
The Broadband Debate, A User's Guide
,
2004,
J. Telecommun. High Technol. Law.
[7]
Gregory L. Rosston,et al.
Local Broadband Access: Primum Non Nocere or Primum Processi? A Property Rights Approach
,
2003
.
[8]
James B. Speta.
Handicapping the Race for the Last Mile?: A Critique of Open Access Rules for Broadband Platforms
,
2000
.