Method for optimizing manipulator’s geometrical parameters and selecting reducers

A geometrical parameters optimization and reducers selection method was proposed for robotic manipulators design. The Lagrangian approach was employed in deriving the dynamic model of a two-DOF manipulator. The flexibility of links and joints was taken into account in the mechanical structure dimensions optimization and reducers selection, in which Timoshenko model was used to discretize the hollow links. Two criteria, i.e. maximization of fundamental frequency and minimization of self-mass/load ratio, were utilized to optimize the manipulators. The NSGA-II (fast elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithms) was employed to solve the multi-objective optimization problem. How the joints flexibility affects the manipulators design was analyzed and shown in the numerical analysis example. The results indicate that simultaneous consideration of the joints and the links flexibility is very necessary for manipulators optimal design. Finally, several optimal combinations were provided. The effectiveness of the optimization method was proved by comparing with ADAMS simulation results. The self-mass/load ratio error of the two methods is within 10%. The maximum error of the natural frequency by the two methods is 23.74%. The method proposed in this work provides a fast and effective pathway for manipulator design and reducers selection.

[1]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  On the Extremal Fundamental Frequencies of One-Link Flexible Manipulators , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Jan Wikander,et al.  Optimal selection of motor and gearhead in mechatronic applications , 2006 .

[3]  Hua-ping Tang,et al.  Optimization of actuator/sensor position of multi-body system with quick startup and brake , 2007 .

[4]  Simone Cinquemani,et al.  Effects of transmission mechanical characteristics on the choice of a motor-reducer , 2010 .

[5]  Marcus Pettersson,et al.  Drive Train Optimization for Industrial Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  H. Benaroya,et al.  DYNAMICS OF TRANSVERSELY VIBRATING BEAMS USING FOUR ENGINEERING THEORIES , 1999 .

[7]  Santosha K. Dwivedy,et al.  Shape Optimization of Flexible Robotic Manipulators , 2006 .

[8]  Michael Rygaard Hansen,et al.  Design optimization on the drive train of a light-weight robotic arm , 2011 .

[9]  Fei-Yue Wang,et al.  Optimum shape construction of flexible manipulators with total weight constraint , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  B. O. Al-Bedoor,et al.  Dynamics of flexible-link and flexible-joint manipulator carrying a payload with rotary inertia , 2000 .

[12]  J. Kosmatka,et al.  An improved two-node timoshenko beam finite element , 1993 .

[13]  Zexiang Li,et al.  Natural frequency based optimal design of a two-link flexible manipulator , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Marc Compere,et al.  Designing flexible manipulators with the lowest natural frequency nearly independent of position , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  M. Spong Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Robots , 1987 .

[16]  Georgios E. Stavroulakis,et al.  Shape control and damage identification of beams using piezoelectric actuation and genetic optimization , 2006 .

[17]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II , 2000, PPSN.

[18]  J. R. Hutchinson Shear coefficients for Timoshenko beam theory , 2001 .