Nurses' use of computerised clinical decision support systems: a case site analysis.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To explore how nurses use computerised clinical decision support systems in clinical practice and the factors that influence use. BACKGROUND There is limited evidence for the benefits of computerised clinical decision support systems in nursing, with the majority of existing research focusing on nurses' use of decision support for telephone triage. Research has suggested that several factors including nurses' experience, features of the technology system and organisational factors may influence how decision support is used in practice. DESIGN A multiple case site study. METHODS Four case sites were purposively selected to provide variation in staff experience, technology used and decisions supported by the technology. Data were collected in each case site using non-participant observation of nurse/patient consultations (n = 115) and interviews with nurses (n = 55). Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS Computerised decision support systems were used in a variety of ways by nurses, including recording information, monitoring patients' progress and confirming decisions that had already been made. Nurses' experience with the decision and the technology affected how they used a decision support system and whether or not they over-rode recommendations made by the system. The ability of nurses to adapt the technology also affected its use. CONCLUSIONS How nurses use computerised decision support appears to be the result of an interaction between a nurses' experience and their ability to adapt the technology to 'fit' with local clinical practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE One of the stated aims of introducing computerised decision support systems to assist nursing practice is to reduce variation and/or the number of errors associated with clinical practice. The study found unanticipated uses in such systems such as the routine over-riding of recommendations which could lead to an increase rather than a decrease in variation or errors.

[1]  I. Holmström.  Decision aid software programs in telenursing: not used as intended? Experiences of Swedish telenurses. , 2007, Nursing & health sciences.

[2]  A. Michael Huberman,et al.  An expanded sourcebook qualitative data analysis , 1994 .

[3]  A. Ruston.  Interpreting and managing risk in a machine bureaucracy: Professional decision-making in NHS Direct , 2006 .

[4]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making , 2007 .

[6]  Alicia O'Cathain,et al.  IN NURSING PRACTICE Nurses ’ views of using computerized decision support software in NHS Direct , 2014 .

[7]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 1998, JAMA.

[8]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes , 1998 .

[9]  James Munro,et al.  Do different types of nurses give different triage decisions in NHS Direct? A mixed methods study , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[10]  E Coiera,et al.  Section 1: Health and Clinical Mangement: The Safety and Quality of Decision Support Systems , 2006, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[11]  A. O’Cathain,et al.  Telephone triage, expert systems and clinical expertise. , 2005, Sociology of health & illness.

[12]  D. Sampson.  Evaluating prescribing competencies and standards used in nurse-independent prescribers’ prescribing consultations , 2007 .

[13]  J. McMurray,et al.  Nurse led, multidisciplinary intervention in chronic heart failure , 1998, Heart.

[14]  A. Young,et al.  Evaluating nurse prescribers' education and continuing professional development for independent prescribing practice: findings from a national survey in England. , 2007, Nurse education today.

[15]  A. Young,et al.  Evaluating prescribing competencies and standards used in nurse independent prescribers’ prescribing consultations , 2007 .

[16]  Marc Berg,et al.  Viewpoint Paper: Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Marc Berg,et al.  Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-support Techniques and Medical Practices , 2022 .

[18]  Mark Rn Jones,et al.  Nurse prescribing : politics to practice , 1999 .

[19]  C. May.  A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[20]  E. Balas,et al.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Carole Thornley.  A question of competence? Re-evaluating the roles of the nursing auxiliary and health care assistant in the NHS. , 2000, Journal of clinical nursing.

[22]  Rebecca Randell,et al.  Effects of computerized decision support systems on nursing performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review , 2007, Journal of health services research & policy.

[23]  Marc Berg,et al.  Case Report: Understanding Implementation: The Case of a Computerized Physician Order Entry System in a Large Dutch University Medical Center , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..