Beyond effective supervision: Identifying key interactions between superior and subordinate

Abstract This paper goes beyond the operant-based model of effective supervision by examining the process associated with one of its key behaviors—performance monitoring—and by drawing on the interactional perspective. A hypothesis that emphasizes the reciprocal and performance-related nature of the events set into motion by performance monitoring was proposed and tested. A randomized two-group experiment was conducted with 60 manager-subordinate pairs. A monitor group in which managers collected information (e.g., sampled the work) was contrasted with an antecedent group in which managers conveyed information (e.g., provided instructions). Using the Operant Superior-Subordinate Taxonomy and Index, trained observers coded both parties' behaviors every 5 seconds. As hypothesized, more subordinate discussions of their own performance and more superior consequences occurred in the monitor vs. antecedent group. Furthermore, the lag sequential analyses revealed a pattern of reciprocal interactions. Monitoring appeared to stimulate subordinates talking about their own performance; this, in turn, set the stage for managers to provide consequences and continue monitoring subordinates' performance. Thus, the documentation of the rich, yet subtle, interaction patterns helped explain the impact of performance monitoring.

[1]  T. Coates,et al.  The Teacher-Pupil Interaction Scale: An Empirical Method for Analyzing the Interactive Effects of Teacher and Pupil Behavior. , 1977 .

[2]  L. Steinberg Latchkey children and susceptibility to peer pressure: An ecological analysis. , 1986 .

[3]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Handbook of Operant Behavior , 2022 .

[4]  Stella Ting-Toomey An Analysis of Verbal Communication Patterns in High and Low Marital Adjustment Groups , 1983 .

[5]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Observing leader behavior: Toward reciprocal determinism in leadership theory. , 1984 .

[6]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Cognition-behavior connections: Attribution and verbal behavior in leader-subordinate interactions☆ , 1986 .

[7]  J. Komaki,et al.  Development of an operant-based taxonomy and observational index of supervisory behavior. , 1986 .

[8]  Fredric M. Jablin Superior–subordinate communication: The state of the art. , 1979 .

[9]  Kathleen M. Watson An Analysis of Communication Patterns: A Method for Discriminating Leader and Subordinate Roles , 1982 .

[10]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[11]  近藤 恭正,et al.  Control Systems in Organizations , 1979 .

[12]  G R Patterson,et al.  The correlation of family management practices and delinquency. , 1984, Child development.

[13]  Jason Millman,et al.  Research on human behavior;: A systematic guide to method , 1972 .

[14]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction , 1982 .

[15]  Lee W. Frederiksen,et al.  Handbook of organizational behavior management , 1982 .

[16]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[17]  J. Komaki Toward effective supervision: An operant analysis and comparison of managers at work. , 1986 .

[18]  Linda L. Putnam Procedural Messages and Small Group Work Climates: A Lag Sequential Analysis , 1981 .

[19]  Vandra L. Huber,et al.  Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction? , 1984, Organizational behavior and human performance.

[20]  J. Komaki,et al.  Definitely not a breeze: Extending an operant model of effective supervision to teams. , 1989 .

[21]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. , 1981 .

[22]  Morgan W. McCall,et al.  Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership , 1982 .

[23]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Behavioral Principles in the Practice of Management , 1985 .

[24]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .