Approximate solutions and performance bounds for the sensor placement problem

This paper considers the placement of m sensors at n > m possible locations. Given noisy observations, knowledge of the state correlation matrix, and a mean square error criterion, the problem can be formulated as an integer programming problem. The solution for large m and n is infeasible, requiring us to look at approximate algorithms. Using properties of matrices, we come up with lower and upper bounds for the optimal solution performance. We also formulate a greedy algorithm and a dynamic programming algorithm that runs in polynomial time of m and n. Finally, we show through simulations that the greedy and dynamic programming algorithms very closely approximate the optimal solution. The sensor placement problem has many energy applications where we are often confronted with limited resources. Some examples include where to place environmental sensors for an area where there are large amounts of distributed solar PV and where to place grid monitors on an electrical distribution microgrid.

[1]  S. Sitharama Iyengar,et al.  Sensor placement for grid coverage under imprecise detections , 2002, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002. (IEEE Cat.No.02EX5997).

[2]  Sailes K. Sengijpta Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory , 1995 .

[3]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Jr. G. Forney,et al.  The viterbi algorithm , 1973 .

[5]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor placement for effective coverage and surveillance in distributed sensor networks , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[6]  Qiao Li,et al.  Phasor measurement units placement for power system state estimation: A greedy approach , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[7]  M. L. Fisher,et al.  An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I , 1978, Math. Program..

[8]  G.K. Venayagamoorthy,et al.  PMU placement for power system observability using binary particle swarm optimization , 2008, 2008 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference.

[9]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-Optimal Sensor Placements in Gaussian Processes: Theory, Efficient Algorithms and Empirical Studies , 2008, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Ronald L. Rivest,et al.  Introduction to Algorithms, 3rd Edition , 2009 .

[11]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Near-optimal sensor placements in Gaussian processes , 2005, ICML.

[12]  Lenwood S. Heath,et al.  The PMU Placement Problem , 2005, SIAM J. Discret. Math..

[13]  A. Abur,et al.  Observability analysis and measurement placement for systems with PMUs , 2004, IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, 2004..

[14]  A. Abur,et al.  Placement of PMUs to Enable Bad Data Detection in State Estimation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  A convex relaxation approach to optimal placement of phasor measurement units , 2011, 2011 4th IEEE International Workshop on Computational Advances in Multi-Sensor Adaptive Processing (CAMSAP).

[16]  Elias Kyriakides,et al.  Optimal PMU placement for improving hybrid state estimator accuracy , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.