Expectable use: An important facet of IT usage

We use a mixed-design classic grounded theory approach.Qualitative and quantitative methods and techniques are used.We conceptualize, define, model a facet of IT usage.We verify the proposed measurement model. In this article, we add to the growing body of recent theoretical literature on usage, which remains fragmented. We propose a new concept emerging from our work - expectable use - as a dispositional facet of IT usage that may evolve over time, depending on training and context. This facet of usage represents the user's disposition, or inclination, to use any IT (digital devices, software, etc.) pro-actively and in a self-determined fashion; it includes affective, cognitive and behavioral elements that result from both individual and group factors. With a classic grounded theory stance, we use mixed data and techniques, both qualitative and quantitative, to conceptualize, define, and model this new variable; we develop a quantitative index to assess it at a given moment in time. As a result of our work, we also propose that expectable use should significantly explain effective use and utilization.

[1]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[2]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[4]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  Buyer Intention to Use Internet-Enabled Reverse Auctions: The Role of Asset Specificity, Product Specialization, and Non-Contractibility , 2008, MIS Q..

[5]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  M. Prensky Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[7]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[8]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Expectation Confirmation in Technology Use , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[10]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[11]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems , 2004, MIS Q..

[12]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[13]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[14]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Technological Frames, Organizational Capabilities, and IT Use: An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Procurement , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[16]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Identifying and Testing the Inhibitors of Technology Usage Intentions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[18]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[19]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Understanding User Revisions When Using Information Systems Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers , 2012, MIS Q..

[20]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[22]  D. Wieland Computer addiction: implications for nursing psychotherapy practice. , 2005, Perspectives in psychiatric care.

[23]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Ning Nan,et al.  Capturing Bottom-Up Information Technology Use Processes: A Complex Adaptive Systems Model , 2011, MIS Q..

[25]  J. Jouët Retour critique sur la sociologie des usages , 2000 .

[26]  David S. White,et al.  Visitors and Residents: A new typology for online engagement , 2011, First Monday.

[27]  David Gefen,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000 .

[28]  Alexander Serenko,et al.  Integrating Technology Addiction and Use: An Empirical Investigation of Online Auction Users , 2011, MIS Q..

[29]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[30]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  Toward A Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs , 1998 .

[31]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[32]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  Research Note - A Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Group Appropriation on Collaborative Technologies Use and Performance , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[34]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  The Differential Use and Effect of Knowledge-Based System Explanations in Novice and Expert Judgement Decisions , 2006, MIS Q..

[35]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[36]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[37]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use , 2010, MIS Q..

[38]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[39]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validating Instruments in MIS Research , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[42]  K. Charmaz The legacy of Anselm Strauss in constructivist grounded theory , 2008 .

[43]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  Design of emerging digital services: a taxonomy , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[45]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[46]  Richard L. Nolan,et al.  Ubiquitous IT: The case of the Boeing 787 and implications for strategic IT research , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[49]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[50]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Ryad Titah,et al.  Information System Use - Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[53]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[54]  John C. Henderson,et al.  An Evolutionary Strategy for Implementing a Decision Support System , 1981 .

[55]  I. B. Myers Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator , 1985 .

[56]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[57]  Barney G. Glaser,et al.  Doing Formal Theory , 2007 .

[58]  E. Deci,et al.  “Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains”: Correction to Deci and Ryan (2008). , 2008 .

[59]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Modern information technology in an old workforce: Toward a strategic research agenda , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[60]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[61]  Mark Srite,et al.  The Role of Espoused National Cultural Values in Technology Acceptance , 2006, MIS Q..

[62]  Isabelle Walsh,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Assess Individual IT Culture , 2009, AMCIS.

[63]  Ornit Raz,et al.  How to Make IT Work:: Cognitive Perspectives for Better Information Technologies Performance , 2006 .

[64]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[65]  David G. Winter,et al.  Personality: Analysis and Interpretation of Lives , 1995 .

[66]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Information Technology and the Nature of Managerial Work: From the Productivity Paradox to the Icarus Paradox? , 1998, MIS Q..

[67]  Robert F. Easley,et al.  Research Note - How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[68]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Dispositional Factors in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style , 2007, MIS Q..

[69]  Varun Grover,et al.  Me, My Self, and I(T): Conceptualizing Information Technology Identity and its Implications , 2015, MIS Q..

[70]  R. Bagozzi Advanced Methods of Marketing Research , 1994 .

[71]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[72]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Syed Nasirin,et al.  Grounded theory method in information systems research: its nature, diversity and opportunities , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[74]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Unity in Diversity: Electronic Patient Record Use in Multidisciplinary Practice , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[75]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[76]  M. Prensky H. Sapiens Digital: From Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom , 2009 .

[77]  R. Zmud INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND MIS SUCCESS: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE* , 1979 .

[78]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[79]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[80]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Web and Wireless Site Usability: Understanding Differences and Modeling Use , 2006, MIS Q..

[81]  Mark Goh,et al.  Leveraging Collaborative Technologies to Build a Knowledge Sharing Culture at HP Analytics , 2011, MIS Q. Executive.

[82]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Job satisfaction. , 1969, Hospital administration currents.

[83]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[84]  Joyce J. Elam,et al.  A Comparative Study of How Experts and Novices Use a Decision Aid to Solve Problems in Complex Knowledge Domains , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[86]  Myers,et al.  Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type , 1980 .

[87]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[88]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[89]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[90]  Isabelle Walsh,et al.  Investigating the Cultural Dimension of IT-Usage: IT-Acculturation, an Essential Construct in IS Research , 2010, ICIS.

[91]  David Kang,et al.  The workflow application as an unintended medium for organizational learning: A longitudinal field study , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[92]  Darshana Sedera,et al.  Re-conceptualizing Information System Success: The IS-Impact Measurement Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[93]  R. Suddaby From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[94]  D. DavisFred,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology , 1989 .

[95]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Understanding and measuring user competence , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[96]  Marjolein van Offenbeek,et al.  Towards integrating acceptance and resistance research: evidence from a telecare case study , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[97]  Sung S. Kim The integrative framework of technology use: an extension and test , 2009 .

[98]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Research Note - Social Interactions and the "Digital Divide": Explaining Variations in Internet Use , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[99]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE , 2007 .

[100]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Who's Afraid of the Virtual World? Anxiety and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[101]  D. Boyd Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[102]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[103]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Expectation , 2008, MIS Q..

[104]  G. Āllport The general and the unique in psychological science. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[105]  C. Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Diffusion of Innovation , 2015 .

[106]  Alexander von Stetten,et al.  Adopting Social Network Sites - The Role of Individual IT Culture and Privacy Concerns , 2011, AMCIS.

[107]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Hype or Help? A Longitudinal Field Study of Virtual World Use for Team Collaboration , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[108]  Trevor T. Moores,et al.  Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and a Test of a Four-Component Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[109]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[110]  Cathy Urquhart,et al.  Putting the ‘theory’ back into grounded theory: guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[111]  Marjolein van Offenbeek,et al.  Managing IS adoption in ambivalent groups , 2011, CACM.

[112]  J. Edwards Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework , 2001 .

[113]  Paul H. J. Hendriks,et al.  The Diving Bell and the Butterfly , 2006 .

[114]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications , 1992 .

[115]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Effect of Culture on IT Diffusion: E-Mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[116]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  What Grounded Theory Is…A Critically Reflective Conversation Among Scholars , 2015 .

[117]  Sue Newell,et al.  Coping with Information Technology: Mixed Emotions, Vacillation, and Nonconforming Use Patterns , 2015, MIS Q..

[118]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[119]  Chu Hsiang Chang,et al.  To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate: Steps for Developing and Validating Higher-Order Multidimensional Constructs , 2011 .

[120]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Managing culture creep: Toward a strategic model of user IT culture , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[121]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[122]  Linda L. Price,et al.  An Agency Perspective on New Technology Champions , 1992 .

[123]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[124]  Isabelle Walsh,et al.  Using quantitative data in mixed-design grounded theory studies: an enhanced path to formal grounded theory in information systems , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[125]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[126]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[127]  Graham C. Low,et al.  Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[128]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Extending technology usage models to interactive hedonic technologies: a theoretical model and empirical test , 2010, Inf. Syst. J..

[129]  D. Straub,et al.  Editor's comments: a critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS quarterly , 2012 .

[130]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[131]  Norman L. Chervany,et al.  What Trust Means in E-Commerce Customer Relationships: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Typology , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[132]  William J. Doll,et al.  A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument , 1994, MIS Q..

[133]  L. Richard Ye,et al.  The Impact of Explanation Facilities in User Acceptance of Expert System Advice , 1995, MIS Q..

[134]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Technology Use and Organizational Newcomer Socialization , 2004 .

[135]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[136]  Mireille Gettler-Summa,et al.  Users' groups Interpreted Through the Lens of the Users' Needs and Motivation , 2010 .

[137]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Acceptance with Peer Support: A Social Network Perspective to Understand Employees' System Use , 2009, MIS Q..

[138]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Beyond natives and immigrants: exploring types of net generation students , 2010, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[139]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[140]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[141]  Jane Webster,et al.  Desktop Videoconferencing: Experiences of Complete Users, Wary Users, and Non-Users , 1998, MIS Q..

[142]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Globalization, culture, and information: Towards global knowledge transparency , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[143]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Research Note - Two Competing Perspectives on Automatic Use: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[144]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI , 2009, OZCHI.

[145]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis , 2002, MIS Q..

[146]  Joan Lalor,et al.  Classic Grounded Theory to Analyse Secondary Data: Reality and Reflections , 2012 .

[147]  Isabelle Walsh,et al.  A strategic path to study IT use through users' IT culture and IT needs: A mixed-method grounded theory , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..