Isokinetic Evaluation of Internal/External Tibial Rotation Strength after the Use of Hamstring Tendons for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background Evaluation of the knee after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the use of the semitendinosus and gracilis (hamstring) autografts has primarily focused on flexion and extension strength. The semitendinosus and gracilis muscles contribute to internal tibial rotation, and it has been suggested that harvest of these tendons for the purpose of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction contributes to internal tibial rotation weakness. Hypothesis Internal tibial rotation strength may be affected by the semitendinosus and gracilis harvest after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design Prospective evaluation of internal and external tibial rotation strength. Methods Inclusion criteria for subjects (N = 30): unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at least 2 years previously, a stable anterior cruciate ligament (<5-mm side-to-side difference) at time of testing confirmed by surgeon and KT-1000 arthrometer, no history of knee problems after initial knee reconstruction, a normal contralateral knee, and the ability to comply with the testing protocol. In an attempt to minimize unwanted subtalar joint motion, subjects were immobilized using an ankle brace and tested at angular velocities of 60°/s, 120°/s, and 180°/s at a knee flexion angle of 90°. Results The mean peak torque measurements for internal rotation strength of the operative limb (60°/s, 17.4 ± 4.5 ft-lb; 120°/s, 13.9 ± 3.3 ft-lb; 180°/s, 11.6 ± 3.0 ft-lb) were statistically different compared to the nonoperated limb (60°/s, 20.5 ± 4.7 ft-lb; 120°/s, 15.9 ± 3.8 ft-lb; 180°/s, 13.4 ± 3.8 ft-lb) at 60°/s (P = .012), 120°/s (P = .036), and 180°/s (P = .045). The nonoperative limb demonstrated greater strength at all speeds. The mean torque measurements for external rotation were statistically similar when compared to the nonoperated limb at all angular velocities. Conclusions We have shown through our study that patients who undergo surgical intervention to repair a torn anterior cruciate ligament with the use of autogenous hamstring tendons demonstrate with weaker internal tibial rotation postoperatively at 2 years when compared to the contralateral limb.

[1]  T. Carter,et al.  Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. , 1999, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  David H. Perrin,et al.  Isokinetic Exercise and Assessment , 1993 .

[3]  M. Torry,et al.  Internal and External Tibial Rotation Strength after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Ipsilateral Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Autografts , 2000, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  B T Bates,et al.  Patterns of tibial rotary torque in knees of healthy subjects. , 1980, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  R. Ishida,et al.  Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament. , 1998, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[6]  L. Hiemstra,et al.  Knee strength deficits after hamstring tendon and patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  R. Marder,et al.  Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 1991, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Cyril B. Frank,et al.  Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament* , 1997 .

[9]  J. Bullock-Saxton,et al.  Strength and Function Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  J. Falkel,et al.  lsokinetic Evaluation of Tibial Rotation: Assessment of a Stabilization Technique*. , 1984, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[11]  K. Markolf,et al.  In vivo rotatory knee stability. Ligamentous and muscular contributions. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.