The strategic impetus for social network ties: reconstituting broken ceo friendship ties

Research on organization–environment relations has focused primarily on formal linkages between organizations such as board interlock ties as a strategy for managing resource dependence. This study examines whether top corporate executives may maintain more informal ties to executives of other firms in order to manage uncertainty arising from resource dependence. Our point of departure is prior research on boards of directors that has examined whether so-called ‘broken board ties’ (i.e., ties that are disrupted due to executive turnover) tend to be reconstituted, and whether resource dependence explains the likelihood of reconstitution. These studies have generally provided little evidence that corporate board ties are used to manage resource dependence. We draw from theory and research on social embeddedness and friendship to suggest that, as a strategy for managing dependence, the maintenance of friendship ties between top executives provides benefits that are comparable to the supposed benefits of board cooptation, while imposing fewer constraints on the organization. Our theory leads to the contention that, despite limited prior evidence that resource dependence determines the formation of formal board ties, corporate leaders may nevertheless reconstitute informal (i.e., friendship) ties to leaders of other firms that have the power to constrain their firms' access to needed resources when those ties have been disrupted (e.g., due to turnover of the CEO's friend). We test our hypotheses with a unique dataset that includes survey data from U.S. corporate leaders collected at two points in time, thus permitting an assessment of whether top executives reconstitute broken social ties to leaders of other firms, and whether various sources of resource dependence predict the likelihood of reconstitution. We discuss implications for strategic perspectives on inter-organizational relations and the sociological literature on embeddedness. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Hazards of the Market: The Continuity and Dissolution of Interorganizational Market Relationships , 1998 .

[2]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[3]  James D. Westphal.  Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[4]  W B Stevenson,et al.  Information processing and problem solving: the migration of problems through formal positions and networks of ties. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[5]  W. V. D. Ven,et al.  The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection , 1981 .

[6]  James E. Henderson,et al.  Power and Firm Profitability in Supply Chains: French Manufacturing Industry in 1993 , 1998 .

[7]  M. Mizruchi.  What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[8]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Interindustry merger patterns and resource dependence: A replication and extension of Pfeffer (1972) , 1997 .

[9]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. , 1993 .

[10]  Jakki J. Mohr,et al.  Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective , 1990 .

[11]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Corporate profits and cooptation : networks of market constraints and directorate ties in the American economy , 1985 .

[13]  W. Baker.  Market Networks and Corporate Behavior , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  G. Fine.  Friendships in the Work Place , 1986 .

[16]  Jitendra V. Singh,et al.  The Ties That Bind: Organizational and Class Bases of Stability in a Corporate Interlock Network , 1986 .

[17]  A. Silver,et al.  Friendship in Commercial Society: Eighteenth-Century Social Theory and Modern Sociology , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  Informal Networks and Organizational Crises: An Experimental Simulation , 1988 .

[19]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[20]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  Challengers, Elites, and Owning Families: A Social Class Theory of Corporate Acquisitions in the 1960s , 2001 .

[21]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[22]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[23]  Nandini Rajagopalan,et al.  Strategic orientations, incentive plan adoptions, and firm performance: evidence from electric utility firms , 1997 .

[24]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of Borrowing by Large American Corporations , 1994 .

[25]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[26]  J. Pfeffer.  Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment , 1972 .

[27]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Firms Seeking Financing , 1999, The New Economic Sociology.

[28]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Money Center Cannot Hold: Commercial Banks in the U.S. System of Corporate Governance , 1999 .

[29]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[31]  P. Ingram,et al.  Friendships among Competitors in the Sydney Hotel Industry1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[33]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Agency and Social Networks: Strategies of Action in a Social Structure of Position, Opposition, and Opportunity , 2000 .

[34]  Philip Selznick.  TVA and the grass roots , 1949 .

[35]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Ceo selection, succession, compensation and firm performance: A theoretical integration and empirical analysis , 1990 .

[36]  J. Montgomery.  Toward a Role‐Theoretic Conception of Embeddedness1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  John DiNardo,et al.  Econometric methods. 4th ed. , 1997 .

[38]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Broken-Tie Reconstitution and the Functions of Interorganizational Interlocks: A Reexamination , 1986 .

[39]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Interlocking Directorates as An Interorganizational Strategy: A Test of Critical Assumptions , 1988 .

[40]  Thomas H. Koenig,et al.  Models of the Significance of Interlocking Corporate Directorates , 1979 .

[41]  D. Lockhart,et al.  Increased Environmental Uncertainty and Changes in Board Linkage Patterns , 1990 .

[42]  R. Hays,et al.  A longitudinal study of friendship development. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Brad M. Barber,et al.  The Friendly and Predatory Acquisition of Large U.S. Corporations in the 1960s: The Other Contested Terrain , 1995 .

[44]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures , 1999 .

[45]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda: , 1996 .

[46]  R. Gulati.  Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[47]  Nan Lin,et al.  Access to occupations through social ties , 1986 .

[48]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[49]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates , 1988 .

[52]  Donald Palmer.  Broken Ties: Interlocking Directorates and Intercorporate Coordination , 1983 .

[53]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[54]  Linda L. Price,et al.  Commercial Friendships: Service Provider--Client Relationships in Context , 1999 .

[55]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity, and the Diffusion of Board Independence in U.S. Corporations , 1995 .