RECONSIDERING THE ROLE OF STRUCTURE IN VISION
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S Lehéricy,et al. The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[2] D. Maurer,et al. The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[3] Nathan Intrator,et al. Towards structural systematicity in distributed, statically bound visual representations , 2003, Cogn. Sci..
[4] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Some Demonstrations of the Effects of Structural Descriptions in Mental Imagery , 1979, Cogn. Sci..
[5] Denis G. Pelli,et al. The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.
[6] Michael J. Tarr,et al. The role of surface pigmentation for recognition revealed by contrast reversal in faces and Greebles , 2005, Vision Research.
[7] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Part Boundaries Alter the Perception of Transparency , 1998 .
[8] Michael L. Peterson,et al. Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355) , 2006 .
[9] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[10] D. Perrett,et al. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: an account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations , 1998, Cognition.
[11] Robert L. Goldstone. Unitization during category learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[12] Jacob Feldman,et al. Visual comparisons within and between object parts: evidence for a single-part superiority effect , 2003, Vision Research.
[13] Joachim M. Buhmann,et al. Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.
[14] Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al. Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] Elie Bienenstock,et al. Compositionality, MDL Priors, and Object Recognition , 1996, NIPS.
[16] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Some Demonstrations of the Effects of Structural Descriptions in Mental Imagery , 1979, Cogn. Sci..
[17] Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al. Connectionism and cognitive architecture , 1993 .
[18] E. Rolls,et al. INVARIANT FACE AND OBJECT RECOGNITION IN THE VISUAL SYSTEM , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.
[19] Yali Amit,et al. Shape Quantization and Recognition with Randomized Trees , 1997, Neural Computation.
[20] Michael J. Black,et al. Fields of Experts: a framework for learning image priors , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).
[21] M. Riesenhuber,et al. Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[22] Jacob Feldman,et al. Perceptual Grouping by Selection of a Logically Minimal Model , 2003, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[23] Donald Geman,et al. Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[24] Jon Driver,et al. Parallel computation of symmetry but not repetition within single visual shapes , 1994 .
[25] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. Image-based object recognition in man and machines , 2001 .
[26] Peter Szolovits,et al. What Is a Knowledge Representation? , 1993, AI Mag..
[27] M. Tarr,et al. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[28] Irving Biederman,et al. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.
[29] Cindy M. Bukach,et al. Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] M. Tarr. Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[31] Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al. Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.
[32] Michael J Tarr,et al. What defines a view? , 2001, Vision Research.
[33] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects , 1998, Cognition.
[34] J. Feldman. What is a visual object? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[35] S. Ullman. Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.
[36] R. Yin. Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .
[37] Michael J. Tarr. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .
[38] M. Tarr. Visual Object Recognition: Can A Single Mechanism Suffice? , 1998 .
[39] I. Biederman,et al. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .
[40] D. Maurer,et al. Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.
[41] P. Schyns,et al. Categorization creates functional features , 1997 .
[42] Bartlett W. Mel. SEEMORE: Combining Color, Shape, and Texture Histogramming in a Neurally Inspired Approach to Visual Object Recognition , 1997, Neural Computation.
[43] M. Farah,et al. Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[44] M. J. Tarr,et al. COMMENT ON: IS HUMAN OBJECT RECOGNITION BETTER DESCRIBED BY GEON STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS OR BY MULTIPLE VIEWS ? BY BARTRAM D.J. , 1995 .
[45] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[46] Garrison W. Cottrell,et al. Holistic Processing Develops Because it is Good , 2005 .
[47] John E. Hummel,et al. Where View-based Theories Break Down: The Role of Structure in Shape Perception and Object Recognition , 2000 .
[48] M J Tarr,et al. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[49] D. Marr,et al. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[50] Wayne D. Gray,et al. Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.
[51] Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.
[52] M. Tarr,et al. Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.
[53] M. Tarr,et al. Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.
[54] Jacob Feldman,et al. Determination of visual figure and ground in dynamically deforming shapes , 2006, Cognition.
[55] David K. A. Barnes,et al. correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.
[56] Shimon Edelman,et al. Representing three-dimensional objects by sets of activities of receptive fields , 1993, Biological Cybernetics.
[57] M. Tarr,et al. Differing views on views: comments on Biederman and Bar (1999) , 2000, Vision Research.
[58] Martin Arguin,et al. Independent Processing of Parts and of Their Spatial Organization in Complex Visual Objects , 2004, Psychological science.
[59] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.