Estimation of Diffusion Processes From Incomplete Data A Simulation Study

Event-history analysis of the diffusion of practices in a social system can show how actors are influenced by each other as well as by their own characteristics. The presumption that complete data on the entire population are essential to draw valid inferences about diffusion processes has been a major limitation in empirical analyses and has precluded diffusion studies in large populations. The authors examine the impacts of several forms of incomplete data on estimation of the heterogeneous diffusion model proposed by Strang and Tuma. Left censoring causes bias, but right censoring leads to no noteworthy problems. Extensive time aggregation biases estimates of intrinsic propensities but not cross-case influences. Importantly, random sampling can yield good results on diffusion processes if there are supplementary data on influential cases outside the sample. The capability of obtaining good estimates from sampled diffusion histories should help to advance research on diffusion.

[1]  O. Frank A Survey of Statistical Methods for Graph Analysis , 1981 .

[2]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[3]  E. E. Zajac,et al.  Dynamics of Organizational populations , 1992 .

[4]  Trond Petersen,et al.  Time-Aggregation Bias in Continuous-Time Hazard-Rate Models , 1991 .

[5]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Adoption of the Multidivisional Structure: Analyzing History from the Start , 1998 .

[6]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[8]  Daniel J. Myers,et al.  Racial rioting in the 1960s : An event history analysis of local conditions , 1997 .

[9]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  M. Hannan,et al.  Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. , 1986 .

[11]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[12]  R. Burt Models of Network Structure , 1980 .

[13]  H. Greve Managerial Cognition and the Mimetic Adoption of Market Positions: What You See is What You Do , 1998 .

[14]  S. Soule,et al.  Runaway Train? The Diffusion of State‐Level Reform in ADC/AFDC Eligibility Requirements, 1950–19671 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  K. Koput,et al.  Time-Aggregation Bias in Hazard-Rate Models with Covariates , 1992 .

[16]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Approaches to the Censoring Problem in Analysis of Event Histories , 1979 .

[17]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Notions of position in social network analysis , 1992 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  David Strang,et al.  Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models , 1991 .

[20]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Patterns of Competition: The Diffusion of a Market Position in Radio Broadcasting , 1996 .

[21]  M. Pagano,et al.  Survival analysis. , 1996, Nutrition.

[22]  G. Guo Event-history analysis for left-truncated data. , 1993, Sociological methodology.

[23]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Survey Sampling , 1998, Nov/Dec 2017.

[24]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment , 1995 .

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter Network Sampling: Some First Steps , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF HETEROGENEOUS DIFFUSION MODELS , 1995 .