Influence of a Threatened‐Species Focus on Conservation Planning

Abstract:  Conservation efforts at local, regional, and global scales often focus on threatened species despite recent calls to adopt more equitable and potentially more economically rational approaches. Critics contend that conservation planning centered only on threatened species fails to deliver cost‐efficient conservation outcomes. We explored how planning to preserve threatened mammal species would influence the efficiency and effectiveness of conservation investments in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. We found that the explicit protection of threatened species delivered cost‐efficient outcomes in this situation, afforded adequate protection to over 90% of those species not yet considered endangered, and contributed to the partial protection of the remainder. We used Marxan, a conservation planning tool, to determine the frequency that planning units are selected in efficient reserve systems and assessed the relative risk of deforestation of each planning unit. Our methods allowed us to identify areas of the region that require the most urgent conservation action.

[1]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Carbon payments as a safeguard for threatened tropical mammals , 2009 .

[2]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Environmental correlates for tropical tree diversity and distribution patterns in Borneo , 2009 .

[3]  Liana N. Joseph,et al.  Optimal Allocation of Resources among Threatened Species: a Project Prioritization Protocol , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  Luigi Boitani,et al.  A gap analysis of Southeast Asian mammals based on habitat suitability models , 2008 .

[5]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Planning for persistence in marine reserves: a question of catastrophic importance. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[6]  S. Andelman,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When , 2007, PLoS biology.

[7]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  National Threatened Species Listing Based on IUCN Criteria and Regional Guidelines: Current Status and Future Perspectives , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Conservation Easements: Biodiversity Protection and Private Use , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[9]  R. Whelan,et al.  Threatened species listing as a trigger for conservation action , 2007 .

[10]  D. Sheil,et al.  A logged forest in Borneo is better than none at all , 2007, Nature.

[11]  Luigi Boitani,et al.  Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates in Italy: Priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape , 2006 .

[12]  S. Polasky,et al.  Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[14]  T. Brooks,et al.  Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[15]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[16]  Simon N. Stuart,et al.  Habitat Suitability Models and the Shortfall in Conservation Planning for African Vertebrates , 2005 .

[17]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Measuring and Incorporating Vulnerability into Conservation Planning , 2005, Environmental management.

[18]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Sensitivity of Systematic Reserve Selection to Decisions about Scale, Biological Data, and Targets: Case Study from Southern British Columbia , 2004 .

[20]  D. Fuller,et al.  Loss of Forest Cover in Kalimantan, Indonesia, Since the 1997–1998 El Niño , 2004 .

[21]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Avoiding Pitfalls of Using Species Distribution Models in Conservation Planning , 2003 .

[22]  M. P. Cummings,et al.  Effectiveness of Conservation Targets in Capturing Genetic Diversity , 2003 .

[23]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Limits to the use of threatened species lists , 2002 .

[24]  P. Jepson,et al.  The End for Indonesia's Lowland Forests? , 2001, Science.

[25]  M. Soulé,et al.  ECOLOGY: Conservation Targets: Do They Help? , 1998, Science.

[26]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Patterns of Behavior in Biodiversity Preservation , 1994 .

[27]  Carlos A. Peres,et al.  Amazonian Nature Reserves: An Analysis of the Defensibility Status of Existing Conservation Units and Design Criteria for the Future , 1994 .

[28]  B. Walker.  Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[29]  IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature West Asia/Middle East (WAME) Regional Office In cooperation with Bibliotheca Alexandrina Funded by Ford Foundation Outcome Report on Future of Sustainability Debate in the Arab Region , 2012 .

[30]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[31]  A. Jarvis.  Hole-field seamless SRTM data, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) , 2008 .

[32]  D. Sheil,et al.  The persistence and conservation of Borneo’s mammals in lowland rain forests managed for timber: observations, overviews and opportunities , 2007, Ecological Research.

[33]  Andrew Metrick,et al.  Patterns of Behavior in Endangered Species Preservation , 2007 .

[34]  Dave M. Augeri,et al.  Life after logging: reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo , 2005 .

[35]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .