In Vivo T-Box Transcription Factor Profiling Reveals Joint Regulation of Embryonic Neuromesodermal Bipotency

Summary The design of effective cell replacement therapies requires detailed knowledge of how embryonic stem cells form primary tissues, such as mesoderm or neurectoderm that later become skeletal muscle or nervous system. Members of the T-box transcription factor family are key in the formation of these primary tissues, but their underlying molecular activities are poorly understood. Here, we define in vivo genome-wide regulatory inputs of the T-box proteins Brachyury, Eomesodermin, and VegT, which together maintain neuromesodermal stem cells and determine their bipotential fates in frog embryos. These T-box proteins are all recruited to the same genomic recognition sites, from where they activate genes involved in stem cell maintenance and mesoderm formation while repressing neurogenic genes. Consequently, their loss causes embryos to form an oversized neural tube with no mesodermal derivatives. This collaboration between T-box family members thus ensures the continuous formation of correctly proportioned neural and mesodermal tissues in vertebrate embryos during axial elongation.

[1]  B. Blumberg,et al.  Tail formation as a continuation of gastrulation: the multiple cell populations of the Xenopus tailbud derive from the late blastopore lip. , 1993, Development.

[2]  Shuji Takahashi,et al.  Zygotic VegT is required for Xenopus paraxial mesoderm formation and is regulated by Nodal signaling and Eomesodermin. , 2010, The International journal of developmental biology.

[3]  D. Wettstein,et al.  The Notch ligand, X-Delta-2, mediates segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm in Xenopus embryos. , 1997, Development.

[4]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Cell type-specific activation of actin genes in the early amphibian embryo , 1984, Nature.

[5]  C. Glass,et al.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[6]  H. Stunnenberg,et al.  A hierarchy of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 acquisition in spatial gene regulation in Xenopus embryos. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[7]  J. Smith,et al.  Mesoderm formation in response to Brachyury requires FGF signalling , 1995, Current Biology.

[8]  I. Dawid,et al.  Gene expression in the embryonic nervous system of Xenopus laevis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. Smith,et al.  Xwnt11 is a target of Xenopus Brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via Dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway. , 2000, Development.

[10]  Steven J. Deimling,et al.  Retinoic acid regulates anterior–posterior patterning within the lateral plate mesoderm of Xenopus , 2009, Mechanisms of Development.

[11]  D. Kimelman,et al.  Brachyury establishes the embryonic mesodermal progenitor niche. , 2010, Genes & development.

[12]  Keisuke Hitachi,et al.  Bowline, a novel protein localized to the presomitic mesoderm, interacts with Groucho/TLE in Xenopus. , 2006, The International journal of developmental biology.

[13]  D. Kimelman,et al.  Regulation of canonical Wnt signaling by Brachyury is essential for posterior mesoderm formation. , 2008, Developmental cell.

[14]  Minoru Watanabe,et al.  FAST-1 is a key maternal effector of mesoderm inducers in the early Xenopus embryo. , 1999, Development.

[15]  Anushya Muruganujan,et al.  PANTHER version 7: improved phylogenetic trees, orthologs and collaboration with the Gene Ontology Consortium , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  J C Smith,et al.  The T-box transcription factor Brachyury regulates expression of eFGF through binding to a non-palindromic response element. , 1998, Development.

[17]  J. Smith,et al.  Direct and indirect regulation of derrière, a Xenopus mesoderm-inducing factor, by VegT. , 2002, Development.

[18]  Paul Flicek,et al.  A gene regulatory network directed by zebrafish No tail accounts for its roles in mesoderm formation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Clifford A. Meyer,et al.  Model-based Analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS) , 2008, Genome Biology.

[20]  J. Smith,et al.  Xom: a Xenopus homeobox gene that mediates the early effects of BMP-4. , 1996, Development.

[21]  T. Pieler,et al.  Comparative expression analysis of the neurogenins in Xenopus tropicalis and Xenopus laevis , 2009, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[22]  G. von Dassow,et al.  Induction of the Xenopus organizer: expression and regulation of Xnot, a novel FGF and activin-regulated homeo box gene. , 1993, Genes & development.

[23]  C. Niehrs,et al.  Periodic repression of Notch pathway genes governs the segmentation of Xenopus embryos. , 1999, Genes & development.

[24]  Keisuke Hitachi,et al.  The Xenopus Bowline/Ripply family proteins negatively regulate the transcriptional activity of T-box transcription factors. , 2009, The International journal of developmental biology.

[25]  E R LaVallie,et al.  derrière: a TGF-beta family member required for posterior development in Xenopus. , 1999, Development.

[26]  C. Müller,et al.  Crystallographic structure of the T domain–DNA complex of the Brachyury transcription factor , 1997, Nature.

[27]  R. Sandberg,et al.  Sequentially acting Sox transcription factors in neural lineage development. , 2011, Genes & development.

[28]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[29]  J. Smith,et al.  Determinants of T box protein specificity. , 2001, Development.

[30]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Xenopus Myf-5 marks early muscle cells and can activate muscle genes ectopically in early embryos. , 1991, Development.

[31]  Pamela L. Schwartzberg,et al.  T Helper Cell Fate Specified by Kinase-Mediated Interaction of T-bet with GATA-3 , 2005, Science.

[32]  F. Conlon,et al.  T‐box genes in early embryogenesis , 2004, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[33]  J. Smith,et al.  Expression of a xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction , 1991, Cell.

[34]  T. L. Cook,et al.  Gene activation during early stages of lens induction in Xenopus. , 1998, Development.

[35]  J. Gurdon,et al.  The Xenopus T-box gene, Antipodean, encodes a vegetally localised maternal mRNA and can trigger mesoderm formation. , 1996, Development.

[36]  M. Trotter,et al.  Pluripotency factors regulate definitive endoderm specification through eomesodermin. , 2011, Genes & development.

[37]  B. Wold,et al.  The bHLH regulator pMesogenin1 is required for maturation and segmentation of paraxial mesoderm. , 2000, Genes & development.

[38]  K. Storey,et al.  An emerging molecular mechanism for the neural vs mesodermal cell fate decision , 2011, Cell Research.

[39]  Virginia E. Papaioannou,et al.  Three neural tubes in mouse embryos with mutations in the T-box gene Tbx6 , 1998, Nature.

[40]  C. Stern Gastrulation : from cells to embryo , 2004 .

[41]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors Determine Cell-Type-Specific Responses to TGF-β Signaling , 2011, Cell.

[42]  J. Cooke Cell number in relation to primary pattern formation in the embryo of Xenopus laevis. I. The cell cycle during new pattern formation in response to implanted organizers. , 1979, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[43]  M. L. King,et al.  Xenopus VegT RNA is localized to the vegetal cortex during oogenesis and encodes a novel T-box transcription factor involved in mesodermal patterning. , 1996, Development.

[44]  D. Sparrow,et al.  Thylacine 1 is expressed segmentally within the paraxial mesoderm of the Xenopus embryo and interacts with the Notch pathway. , 1998, Development.

[45]  A. Sharov,et al.  Exhaustive Search for Over-represented DNA Sequence Motifs with CisFinder , 2009, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[46]  Julia Zeitlinger,et al.  Paused Pol II Coordinates Tissue Morphogenesis in the Drosophila Embryo , 2013, Cell.

[47]  J. Baker,et al.  HEB and E2A function as SMAD/FOXH1 cofactors. , 2011, Genes & development.

[48]  M. Biggin Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua. , 2011, Developmental cell.

[49]  R. Heald,et al.  Nuclear Size Is Regulated by Importin α and Ntf2 in Xenopus , 2010, Cell.

[50]  S. Kato,et al.  Ledgerline, a Novel Xenopus laevis Gene, Regulates Differentiation of Presomitic Mesoderm During Somitogenesis , 2006, Zoological science.

[51]  M. Tada,et al.  Regulation of apoptosis in theXenopus embryo by Bix3 , 2003, Development.

[52]  A. Philpott,et al.  A single cdk inhibitor, p27Xic1, functions beyond cell cycle regulation to promote muscle differentiation in Xenopus , 2003, Development.

[53]  M W Klymkowsky,et al.  Whole-mount staining of Xenopus and other vertebrates. , 1991, Methods in cell biology.

[54]  M. Kirschner,et al.  The fate of cells in the tailbud of Xenopus laevis. , 2000, Development.

[55]  M. Goulding,et al.  Expression of Pax-3 is initiated in the early neural plate by posteriorizing signals produced by the organizer and by posterior non-axial mesoderm. , 1997, Development.

[56]  Hammad Qureshi Contributions , 1974, Livre Blanc de la Recherche en Mécanique.

[57]  Martin Werber,et al.  Expression of Msgn1 in the presomitic mesoderm is controlled by synergism of WNT signalling and Tbx6 , 2007, EMBO reports.

[58]  K. Storey,et al.  Loss of FGF-Dependent Mesoderm Identity and Rise of Endogenous Retinoid Signalling Determine Cessation of Body Axis Elongation , 2012, PLoS biology.

[59]  J. Smith,et al.  Analysis of competence and of Brachyury autoinduction by use of hormone-inducible Xbra. , 1997, Development.

[60]  B. Hogan,et al.  The forkhead genes, Foxc1 and Foxc2, regulate paraxial versus intermediate mesoderm cell fate. , 2004, Developmental biology.

[61]  Minoru Watanabe,et al.  Smad4 and FAST-1 in the assembly of activin-responsive factor , 1997, Nature.

[62]  D. Melton,et al.  Xwnt-11: a maternally expressed Xenopus wnt gene. , 1993, Development.

[63]  V. Wilson,et al.  Redefining the progression of lineage segregations during mammalian embryogenesis by clonal analysis. , 2009, Developmental cell.

[64]  P. Chesley Development of the short‐tailed mutant in the house mouse , 1935 .

[65]  B. Langmead,et al.  Aligning Short Sequencing Reads with Bowtie , 2010, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[66]  E. Nishida,et al.  The TGF‐β family member derrière is involved in regulation of the establishment of left–right asymmetry , 2000, EMBO reports.

[67]  H. Kondoh,et al.  Groucho-associated transcriptional repressor ripply1 is required for proper transition from the presomitic mesoderm to somites. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[68]  Nan Guo,et al.  PANTHER version 6: protein sequence and function evolution data with expanded representation of biological pathways , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[69]  W. Hennink,et al.  Identification of Formaldehyde-induced Modifications in Proteins , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[70]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[71]  James C. Smith,et al.  Specification of mesodermal pattern in Xenopus laevis by interactions between Brachyury, noggin and Xwnt‐8. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[72]  Richard A Young,et al.  Chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis of protein location , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[73]  J. Gurdon,et al.  Eomesodermin, a Key Early Gene in Xenopus Mesoderm Differentiation , 1996, Cell.

[74]  M. Horb,et al.  A vegetally localized T-box transcription factor in Xenopus eggs specifies mesoderm and endoderm and is essential for embryonic mesoderm formation. , 1997, Development.

[75]  W. Huber,et al.  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. MAnorm: a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets , 2011 .

[76]  J. Smith,et al.  Ectopic mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos caused by widespread expression of a Brachyury homologue , 1992, Nature.

[77]  S. Takada,et al.  Activator-to-Repressor Conversion of T-Box Transcription Factors by the Ripply Family of Groucho/TLE-Associated Mediators , 2008, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[78]  Shane J. Neph,et al.  An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints , 2012, Nature.

[79]  A. Monsoro-Burq A rapid protocol for whole-mount in situ hybridization on Xenopus embryos. , 2007, CSH protocols.

[80]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Characterization of human FAST-1, a TGFβ and activin signal transducer , 1998 .

[81]  Kurt E. Johnson,et al.  Normal Table of Xenopus Laevis , 1968, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.