The relation of patent ownership and firm success cases from the LCD Flat-Panel-Display industry

This paper investigates the relationship of patenting and economic success, measured in sales revenues, of eight leading manufacturers of flat panel displays. Our results from a correlation analysis prove a strong relation for a time lag between annual patent applications and sales revenues between one and two years. The results indicate that companies who frequently patent are more successful. Our findings thus do not confirm evidence from prior studies that proved the importance of patents only in long-cycle time industries such as pharmaceuticals. Having employed only free online patent databases, our results imply that nowadays these databases reached a sufficient standard for business intelligence purposes, especially for SMEs that might not employ dedicated resources for this task.

[1]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  Worlds Apart: Patent Information and Innovation in Smes , 2003 .

[2]  H. Ernst Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level , 2001 .

[3]  J. A. Neto,et al.  Evaluation of technological change in the Brazilian semiconductor industry , 2006 .

[4]  D. Austin,et al.  An Event-Study Approach to Measuring Innovative Output: The Case of Biotechnology , 1993 .

[5]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[6]  Joseph A. Castellano,et al.  Handbook of display technology , 1992 .

[7]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The effects of strengthening patent rights on firms engaged in cumulative innovation: Insights from the semiconductor industry , 2001 .

[8]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Instruments for patent data analyses in business firms , 1992 .

[9]  Manuel Trajtenberg Innovation in Israel 1968-97: a Comparative Analysis Using Patent Data , 1999 .

[10]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Patenting strategies in the German mechanical engineering industry and their relationship to company performance , 1995 .

[11]  Michael Blackman,et al.  Intellectual property: a power tool for economic growth , 2003 .

[12]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems , 2005, Scientometrics.

[13]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[14]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Corporate Inventive Output, Profits, and Growth , 1965, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  F. Narin,et al.  Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength , 1987 .

[16]  F. Scherer,et al.  Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Klaus Jennewein,et al.  Intellectual Property Management: The Role of Technology-Brands in the Appropriation of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[18]  Robert L. Wisnieff,et al.  Electronic displays for information technology , 2000, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[19]  L. Kim The Dynamics of Samsung's Technological Learning in Semiconductors , 1997 .

[20]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[21]  Mary Ellen Mogee,et al.  Using Patent Data for Technology Analysis and Planning , 1991 .

[22]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[23]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D, Patents, and Market Value Revisited: is There Evidence of a Secondtechnological Opportunity Related Factor? , 1988, Economics of Innovation and New Technology.

[24]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[25]  D. Teece The Strategic Management of Technology and Intellectual Property , 2006 .

[26]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  Patent Paradox Revisited: Determinants of Patenting in the Us Semiconductor Industry, 1980-94 , 1999 .

[27]  David J. Teece,et al.  Technology and Technology Transfer: Mansfieldian Inspirations and Subsequent Developments , 2004 .

[28]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[29]  Mary Ellen Mogee,et al.  International patent analysis as a tool for corporate technology analysis and planning , 1994 .

[30]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .