The Impact of Mobilization Media on Off-Line and Online Participation: Are Mobilization Effects Medium-Specific?

In recent years, voluntary associations and political organizations have increasingly switched to Internet-based mobilization campaigns, replacing traditional forms of face-to-face recruitment and mobilization. The existing body of empirical research on Internet-based mobilization, however, is not conclusive about the effects this form of mobilization might have. In this article, the authors argue that this lack of strong conclusions might be due to the failure to distinguish different behavioral outcomes of mobilization, and more specifically, a distinction between online and off-line forms of participation is missing. In this experimental study, participants were exposed to potentially mobilizing information either by way of face-to-face interaction or by website. The results of the experiment indicate that web-based mobilization only has a significant effect on online participation, whereas face-to-face mobilization has a significant impact on off-line behavior, which would imply that mobilization effects are medium-specific. The authors close with some observations on what these findings might imply for the democratic consequences of the current trend toward an increasing reliance on Internet-based forms of political mobilization.

[1]  R. Jowell,et al.  The Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London, UK , 2011 .

[2]  J. V. Laer Activists Online and Offline: The Internet as an Information Channel for Protest Demonstrations , 2010 .

[3]  Dana R. Fisher,et al.  MOBILIZING FRIENDS AND STRANGERS , 2010 .

[4]  D. Stolle,et al.  Why Can’t a Student Be More Like an Average Person?: Sampling and Attrition Effects in Social Science Field and Laboratory Experiments , 2010 .

[5]  Allison Dale,et al.  Don't Forget to Vote: Text Message Reminders as a Mobilization Tool , 2009 .

[6]  Luisa Doldi,et al.  Civic Life Online: Learning How Digital Media Can Engage Youth , 2009 .

[7]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[8]  Rachel Gibson,et al.  PARTIES IN THE DIGITAL AGE—A REVIEW ARTICLE , 2009 .

[9]  Ellen Quintelier,et al.  Belgian Political Panel Survey (BPPS), 2006-2011. Technical report , 2009 .

[10]  Ellen Quintelier,et al.  Social Science Computer Review Volume Xx Number X Month Xxxx Xx-xx the Effect of Internet Use on Political Participation an Analysis of Survey Results for 16-year-olds in Belgium , 2022 .

[11]  Christian Breunig,et al.  Communication and Political Mobilization: Digital Media and the Organization of Anti-Iraq War Demonstrations in the U.S. , 2008 .

[12]  Brian F. Schaffner,et al.  Digital Divide or Just Another Absentee Ballot? , 2008 .

[13]  Richard W. Davis Making a Difference: A Comparative View of the Role of the Internet in Election Politics , 2008 .

[14]  Allegra Gonzalez,et al.  Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  W. Bennett Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age , 2008 .

[16]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[17]  The Ineffectiveness of E-Vites to Democracy , 2007 .

[18]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Beyond the “Narrow Data Base”: Another Convenience Sample for Experimental Research , 2007 .

[19]  Claes H. de Vreese Digital Renaissance: Young Consumer and Citizen? , 2007 .

[20]  Brian S. Krueger A Comparison of Conventional and Internet Political Mobilization , 2006 .

[21]  William H. Dutton,et al.  The Internet and the Public: Online and Offline Political Participation in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[22]  Thierry Vedel,et al.  Introduction: The Potential of the Internet Revisited , 2006 .

[23]  Horace Herring,et al.  Energy efficiency—a critical view , 2006 .

[24]  Rachel K. Gibson,et al.  Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects 1 , 2005 .

[25]  Samuel J. Best,et al.  Analyzing the representativeness of internet political participation , 2005 .

[26]  Iván Risueño Michele Micheletti: Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism and collective action. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2003 , 2004 .

[27]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Classifying and Coding Online Actions , 2004 .

[28]  E. Uslaner Trust, Civic Engagement, and the Internet , 2004 .

[29]  B. Loader,et al.  Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements , 2004 .

[30]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  M. Jennings,et al.  Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[32]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  A Boost or Bust for Democracy? , 2003 .

[33]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation? , 2003 .

[34]  W. Bennett,et al.  Communicating Global Activism , 2003 .

[35]  Bruce Bimber Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution of Political Power , 2003 .

[36]  Bruce Bimber Information and American Democracy: Contents , 2003 .

[37]  Michele Micheletti Political virtue and shopping : individuals, consumerism, and collective action , 2003 .

[38]  Mike Schmierbach,et al.  Nonrecursive Models of Internet Use and Community Engagement: Questioning Whether Time Spent Online Erodes Social Capital , 2002 .

[39]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Movement Participation in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[40]  Brian S. Krueger Assessing the Potential of Internet Political Participation in the United States , 2002 .

[41]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  Internet and American Democracy , 2002 .

[42]  Stefaan Walgrave,et al.  New media, new movements? The role of the internet in shaping the ‘anti‐globalization’ movement , 2002 .

[43]  Bruce Bimber Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[44]  Donald P. Green,et al.  Getting out the youth vote: Results from randomized field experiments , 2001 .

[45]  D. Green,et al.  The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment , 2000, American Political Science Review.

[46]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[47]  M. Diani SOCIAL MOVEMENT NETWORKS VIRTUAL AND REAL , 2000 .

[48]  Michael Margolis,et al.  Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace `Revolution′ , 2000 .

[49]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Internet and Political Mobilization , 1998 .

[50]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[51]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[52]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[53]  Dirk Oegema,et al.  POTENTIALS, NETWORKS, MOTIVATIONS, AND BARRIERS: STEPS TOWARDS PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS * , 1987 .

[54]  J. Ferrari,et al.  Personal versus impersonal methods for recruiting blood donations. , 1984, The Journal of social psychology.

[55]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[56]  G. Kramer THE EFFECTS OF PRECINCT-LEVEL CANVASSING ON VOTER BEHAVIOR , 1970 .

[57]  H. Gosnell,et al.  Getting out the vote : an experiment in the stimulation of voting , 1927 .