Dwarf or Giant: The Influence of Interpupillary Distance and Eye Height on Size Perception in Virtual Environments

This paper addresses the question: to what extent can deliberate manipulations of interpupillary distance (IPD) and eye height be used in a virtual reality (VR) experience to influence a user’s sense of their own scale with respect to their surrounding environment – evoking, for example, the illusion of being miniaturized, or of being a giant? In particular, we report the results of an experiment in which we separately study the effect of each of these body scale manipulations on users’ perception of object size in a highly detailed, photorealistically rendered immersive virtual environment, using both absolute numeric measures and body-relative actions. Following a real world training session, in which participants learn to accurately report the metric sizes of individual white cubes (3”–20”) presented one at a time on a table in front of them, we conduct two blocks of VR trials using nine different combinations of IPD and eye height. In the first block of trials, participants report the perceived metric size of a virtual white cube that sits on a virtual table, at the same distance used in the real-world training, within in a realistic virtual living room filled with many objects capable of providing familiar size cues. In the second block of trials, participants use their hands to indicate the perceived size of the cube. We found that size judgments were moderately correlated (r = 0.4) between the two response methods, and that neither altered eye height (± 50cm) nor reduced (10mm) IPD had a significant effect on size judgments, but that a wider (150mm) IPD caused a significant (μ = 38%, p < 0.01) decrease in perceived cube size. These findings add new insights to our understanding of how eye height and IPD manipulations can affect peoples' perception of scale in highly realistic immersive VR scenarios.

[1]  Jeanine Stefanucci,et al.  Big Foot , 2015, ACM Trans. Appl. Percept..

[2]  D. McCready On size, distance, and visual angle perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Mapping the Zone of Eye-Height Utility for Seated and Standing Observers , 2000, Perception.

[4]  S. Best,et al.  Perceptual and oculomotor implications of interpupillary distance settings on a head-mounted virtual display , 1996, Proceedings of the IEEE 1996 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON 1996.

[5]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  Effects of Stereo Viewing Conditions on Distance Perception in Virtual Environments , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[6]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Eye Height Manipulations: A Possible Solution to Reduce Underestimation of Egocentric Distances in Head-Mounted Displays , 2015, TAP.

[7]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[8]  Mathias Müller,et al.  The Influence of the Stereo Base on Blind and Sighted Reaches in a Virtual Environment , 2015, TAP.

[9]  G. Bruder,et al.  Perceptual Evaluation of Interpupillary Distances in Head-mounted Display Environments , 2011 .

[10]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Welcome to Wonderland: The Influence of the Size and Shape of a Virtual Hand On the Perceived Size and Shape of Virtual Objects , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  R N Haber,et al.  The independence of size perception and distance perception , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Gerd Bruder,et al.  Scale matters! Analysis of dominant scale estimation in the presence of conflicting cues in multi-scale collaborative virtual environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[13]  Fumio Kishino,et al.  Investigation of Errors in Perception of Stereoscopically Presented Virtual Object Locations in Real Display Space , 1994 .

[14]  M. Wraga Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Eye height scaling of absolute size in immersive and nonimmersive displays. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Absolute motion parallax weakly determines visual scale in real and virtual environments , 1995, Electronic Imaging.