Segmentation of Prostate in Diffusion MR Images via Clustering

Automatic segmentation of prostate gland in magnetic resonance (MR) images is a challenging task due to large variations of prostate shapes and indistinct boundaries with adjacent tissues. In this paper, we propose an automatic pipeline to segment prostate gland in diffusion magnetic resonance images (dMRI). The most common approach for segmenting prostate in MR images is based on image registration, which is computationally expensive and solely relies on the pre-segmented images (also known as atlas). In contrast, the proposed method uses a clustering method applied to the dMRI to separate prostate gland from the surrounding tissues followed by a postprocessing stage via active contours. The proposed pipeline was validated on prostate MR images of 25 patients and the segmentation results were compared to manually delineated prostate contours. The proposed method achieves an overall accuracy with mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.84\(\ \pm \ \)0.04, while being the most effective in the middle prostate gland producing a mean DSC of 0.91\(\ \pm \ \)0.03. The proposed method has the potential to be integrated into clinical decision support systems that aid radiologists in monitoring prostate cancer.

[1]  Emmanouil Moschidis,et al.  Automatic differential segmentation of the prostate in 3-D MRI using Random Forest classification and graph-cuts optimization , 2012, 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[2]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Geodesic Active Contours , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[4]  Florian Jung,et al.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challenge , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  P. Boyle,et al.  Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume predict long-term changes in symptoms and flow rate: results of a four-year, randomized trial comparing finasteride versus placebo. PLESS Study Group. , 1999, Urology.

[6]  R. Lenkinski,et al.  Accurate prostate volume estimation using multifeature active shape models on T2-weighted MRI. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[7]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Prostate MRI Segmentation Using Learned Semantic Knowledge and Graph Cuts , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  A Local ROI-specific Atlas-based Segmentation of Prostate Gland and Transitional Zone in Diffusion MRI , 2016 .

[9]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Sequential Registration-Based Segmentation of the Prostate Gland in MR Image Volumes , 2015, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  P. Kunz,et al.  A qualitative and a quantitative analysis of an auto-segmentation module for prostate cancer. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre- and intraoperative prostate imaging. , 2001, Medical physics.

[12]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Shahryar Rahnamayan,et al.  Inter-slice bidirectional registration-based segmentation of the prostate gland in MR and CT image sequences. , 2013, Medical physics.