In three experiments involving 22 conditions, amount of free recall was shown to vary with type and combination of orienting task performed during the presentation of a list of 24 low-frequency English nouns. When the orienting task was semantic, that is, it required the subjects to process the meanings of words, recall was significantly higher than that of subjects performing nonsemantic orienting tasks. When two orienting tasks were performed serially during the presentation interval, and one of the tasks was semantic, recall was significantly higher than the recall of groups performing only nonsemantic tasks. When the two tasks were nonsemantic, recall was indistinguishable from the recall of subjects performing single nonsemantic tasks. When the incidental subjects performed a semantic task either singly or in combination with another task, recall was not significantly different from that of a control group of intentional learners who performed no orienting task. The findings are concordant with “process” explanations of the effects of orienting tasks and discordant with “difficulty” or “effort” theories.
[1]
T. S. Hyde,et al.
Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words.
,
1969
.
[2]
J. Jenkins,et al.
Two More Incidental Tasks That Differentially Affect Associative Clustering in Recall.
,
1971
.
[3]
T. S. Hyde,et al.
Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks.
,
1973
.
[4]
A. Mechanic.
The distribution of recalled items in simultaneous intentional and incidental learning.
,
1962,
Journal of experimental psychology.
[5]
A. Mechanic.
The responses involved in the rote learning of verbal materials
,
1964
.
[6]
A. Mechanic.
Effects of orienting task, practice, and incentive on simultaneous incidental and intentional learning.
,
1962,
Journal of Experimental Psychology.