A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology1

This study examined factors affecting perceived risks and acceptance of gene technology. Based on the reviewed literature, a causal model was proposed. The plausibility of the postulated model was tested using structural equation modeling procedures. Participants were randomly selected students from a Swiss university (N= 837). Results indicated that trust in companies and scientists performing gene manipulations have a strong effect on the benefits and risks perceived. When trust was controlled for the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit vanished. Furthermore, world views, perceived benefit, and perceived risk each are found to contribute independently to the prediction of acceptance of gene technology. World views and trust appear to play an important role in perceptions of gene technology.

[1]  Helmut Jungermann,et al.  Credibility, Information Preferences, and Information Interests , 1995 .

[2]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Genetic engineering and food: What determines consumer acceptance , 1995 .

[3]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Societal risks as seen by a Norwegian public , 1988 .

[4]  Isaac Rabino,et al.  How European and U.S. Genetic Engineering Scientists View the Impact of Public Attention on Their Field: A Comparison , 1994, Science, technology & human values.

[5]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  F. Fagnani,et al.  Risk Perception and Social Acceptability of Technologies: The French Case , 1989 .

[7]  R. Shepherd,et al.  Effective communication about genetic engineering and food , 1996 .

[8]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  J. Richard Eiser,et al.  Belief and Values in the Nuclear Debate1 , 1979 .

[10]  C. Palmer,et al.  Risk perception: an empirical study of the relationship between worldview and the risk construct. , 1996, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Karl Dake.  Orienting Dispositions in the Perception of Risk , 1991 .

[12]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model , 1992 .

[13]  B. Baird,et al.  Tolerance for environmental health risks: the influence of knowledge, benefits, voluntariness, and environmental attitudes. , 1986, Risk Analysis.

[14]  R. Gregory,et al.  Perceived Risk, Dread, and Benefits , 1993 .

[15]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions , 1993 .

[16]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[17]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[18]  B. Zechendorf.  What the Public Thinks About Biotechnology , 1994, Bio/Technology.

[19]  Timothy C. Earle,et al.  Culture, Cosmopolitanism, and Risk Management , 1997 .

[20]  Tadeusz Tyszka,et al.  Risk perception in Poland: A comparison with three other countries , 1991 .

[21]  Kenneth H. Craik,et al.  Contemporary Worldviews: Personal and Policy Implications12 , 1983 .

[22]  Jan A. J. Stolwijk,et al.  Risk and Benefit Perceptions, Acceptability Judgments, and Self-Reported Actions toward Nuclear Power , 1982 .

[23]  Ortwin Renn.  Individual and Social Perception of Risk , 1995 .

[24]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1 , 1996 .

[25]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[27]  Lynn J. Frewer,et al.  Gene technology, food production, and public opinion: A UK study , 1994 .