Evaluation of Teaching Performance with Outliers Data using Fuzzy Approach

Abstract Both ratings and weight aspects have recently received great consideration in teaching performance evaluation. Unfortunately, in some cases, the trend of adopting merely the rating aspect has created concern as it can lead to questionable outcome. Besides that, the existence of outliers in the data will also affect the evaluations’ results. Evaluating teaching performance is also not an easy task as it involves human decision making which is imprecise, vague and uncertain. In this paper, the fuzzy evaluation method with fuzzy Jaccard ranking index is applied in evaluating teaching performance at one of the public universities in the East Coast of Malaysia. The outliers data which are detected by using the standard score concept were trimmed off and thus had minimized the variation within the data. Findings conclude that teaching is the key factor in evaluating the teaching performance. The proposed approach gives a promising prospect in teaching performance evaluation where it provides a more reasonable and intelligent evaluation with accurate results.

[1]  Jui-Kuei Chen,et al.  A Pro-performance appraisal system for the university , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[2]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  A new approach for ranking fuzzy numbers by distance method , 1998, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Appraising the performance of high school teachers based on fuzzy number arithmetic operations , 2008, Soft Comput..

[4]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  The revised method of ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid and original points , 2008, Comput. Math. Appl..

[5]  B. Asady,et al.  RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS BY DISTANCE MINIMIZATION , 2007 .

[6]  Hung-Tso Lin,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Order selection and pricing methods using flexible quantity and fuzzy approach for buyer evaluation , 2007 .

[7]  Yan Li,et al.  Study on Performance Appraisal Method of College Teachers , 2009, 2009 International Symposium on Computer Network and Multimedia Technology.

[8]  M. Setnes,et al.  Compatibility-based ranking of fuzzy numbers , 1997, 1997 Annual Meeting of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.97TH8297).

[9]  Shyi-Ming Chen,et al.  Fuzzy risk analysis based on the ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers , 2007, Applied Intelligence.

[10]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1979 .

[11]  Chengling Zhao,et al.  The Research on Network Teaching Evaluation Based on Fuzzy Synthesis , 2009, 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science.

[12]  Yuh-Yuan Guh,et al.  Fuzzy multiple attributes and multiple hierarchical decision making , 1996 .

[13]  Daud Mohamad,et al.  A Centroid-Based Performance Evaluation Using Aggregated Fuzzy Numbers , 2009 .

[14]  T. Chu,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers with an area between the centroid point and original point , 2002 .

[15]  Li-Xin Wang,et al.  A Course In Fuzzy Systems and Control , 1996 .

[16]  Jing-Shing Yao,et al.  Ranking fuzzy numbers based on decomposition principle and signed distance , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[17]  Saeid Abbasbandy,et al.  Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance , 2006, Inf. Sci..

[18]  Daud Mohamad,et al.  On the Jaccard Index Similarity Measure in Ranking Fuzzy Numbers , 2009 .