Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor

Summary One of the most pervasive concepts in the study of community assembly is the metaphor of the environmental filter, which refers to abiotic factors that prevent the establishment or persistence of species in a particular location. The metaphor has its origins in the study of community change during succession and in plant community dynamics, although it has gained considerable attention recently as part of a surge of interest in functional trait and phylogenetic-based approaches to the study of communities. While the filtering metaphor has clear utility in some circumstances, it has been challenging to reconcile the environmental filtering concept with recent developments in ecological theory related to species coexistence. These advances suggest that the evidence used in many studies to assess environmental filtering is insufficient to distinguish filtering from the outcome of biotic interactions. We re-examine the environmental filtering metaphor from the perspective of coexistence theory. In an effort to move the discussion forward, we present a simple framework for considering the role of the environment in shaping community membership, review the literature to document the evidence typically used in environmental filtering studies and highlight research challenges to address in coming years. The current usage of the environmental filtering term in empirical studies likely overstates the role abiotic tolerances play in shaping community structure. We recommend that the term ‘environmental filtering’ only be used to refer to cases where the abiotic environment prevents establishment or persistence in the absence of biotic interactions, although only 15% of the studies in our review presented such evidence. Finally, we urge community ecologists to consider additional mechanisms aside from environmental filtering by which the abiotic environment can shape community pattern.

[1]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Phylogenetic relatedness and the determinants of competitive outcomes. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[2]  Oscar Godoy,et al.  Phenology effects on invasion success: insights from coupling field experiments to coexistence theory. , 2014, Ecology.

[3]  Peter B Adler,et al.  Trait-based tests of coexistence mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology Letters.

[4]  Todd H. Oakley,et al.  Experimental evidence that evolutionary relatedness does not affect the ecological mechanisms of coexistence in freshwater green algae. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[5]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[6]  J. Soussana,et al.  Habitat filtering and niche differentiation jointly explain species relative abundance within grassland communities along fertility and disturbance gradients. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[7]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Change in community phylogenetic structure during tropical forest succession: evidence from New Guinea , 2012 .

[8]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  The biogeography and filtering of woody plant functional diversity in North and South America , 2012 .

[9]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[10]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest , 2010 .

[11]  B. Shipley From Plant Traits to Vegetation Structure: Chance and Selection in the Assembly of Ecological Communities , 2009 .

[12]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity , 2009, Nature.

[13]  B. Enquist,et al.  Opposing assembly mechanisms in a neotropical dry forest: implications for phylogenetic and functional community ecology. , 2009, Ecology.

[14]  J. Cavender-Bares,et al.  The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[15]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Community assembly and shifts in plant trait distributions across an environmental gradient in coastal California , 2009 .

[16]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Abiotic and biotic resistance to grass invasion in serpentine annual plant communities , 2009, Oecologia.

[17]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Functional Traits and Niche-Based Tree Community Assembly in an Amazonian Forest , 2008, Science.

[18]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Drought sensitivity shapes species distribution patterns in tropical forests , 2007, Nature.

[19]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. , 2006, Ecology.

[20]  Jeannine Cavender-Bares,et al.  Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. , 2006, Ecology.

[21]  D. Ackerly,et al.  A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. , 2006, Ecology.

[22]  B. Enquist,et al.  Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  H. Muller‐Landau,et al.  ANNUAL AND SPATIAL VARIATION IN SEEDFALL AND SEEDLING RECRUITMENT IN A NEOTROPICAL FOREST , 2005 .

[24]  Christopher J. Lortie,et al.  The importance of importance , 2005 .

[25]  Peter Chesson,et al.  How the Spatial Scales of Dispersal, Competition, and Environmental Heterogeneity Interact to Affect Coexistence , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[26]  J. Bastow Wilson,et al.  Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community , 2004 .

[27]  D. Roy,et al.  Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host‐plant strategies drive butterfly status? , 2004 .

[28]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[30]  C. Lortie,et al.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress , 2002, Nature.

[31]  P. Chesson Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity , 2000 .

[32]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Exploring the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities: An Example for Rain Forest Trees , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[33]  C. J. West,et al.  Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions , 2000 .

[34]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Community Assembly Rules, Morphological Dispersion, and the Coexistence of Plant Species , 1998 .

[35]  George P. Malanson,et al.  Realized versus fundamental niche functions in a model of chaparral response to climatic change , 1992 .

[36]  K. Landa,et al.  Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition , 1991 .

[37]  F. Bazzaz Habitat Selection in Plants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[38]  F. Woodward,et al.  Functional Approaches to Predicting the Ecological Effects of Global Change , 1991 .

[39]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits , 1988, Nature.

[40]  A. G. Valk,et al.  Succession in Wetlands: A Gleasonian Appraoch , 1981 .

[41]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary Theory , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[42]  J. P. Grime,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN THREE PERENNIAL GRASSES , 1976 .

[43]  R. Whittaker Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[44]  Frederic E. Clements Pflanzengeographie auf Physiologischer Grundlage , 1899 .

[45]  A. V. Humboldt,et al.  Essai sur la géographie des plantes , 1805 .