Toward an Understanding of Why People Discriminate: Evidence from a Series of Natural Field Experiments

Social scientists have presented evidence that suggests discrimination is ubiquitous: women, nonwhites, and the elderly have been found to be the target of discriminatory behavior across several labor and product markets. Scholars have been less successful at pinpointing the underlying motives for such discriminatory patterns. We employ a series of field experiments across several market and agent types to examine the nature and extent of discrimination. Our exploration includes examining discrimination based on gender, age, sexual orientation, race, and disability. Using data from more than 3000 individual transactions, we find evidence of discrimination in each market. Interestingly, we find that when the discriminator believes the object of discrimination is controllable, any observed discrimination is motivated by animus. When the object of discrimination is not due to choice, the evidence suggests that statistical discrimination is the underlying reason for the disparate behavior.

[1]  G. Arabsheibani,et al.  In the pink: Homosexual‐heterosexual wage differentials in the UK , 2004 .

[2]  C. Fershtman,et al.  Trust and discrimination in a segmented society: An experimental approach , 2001 .

[3]  Adolescents' perceptions of controllability and its relationship to explicit obesity bias. , 2011, The Journal of school health.

[4]  N. Berg,et al.  Measuring the Effect of Sexual Orientation on Income: Evidence of Discrimination? , 2002 .

[5]  J. List The nature and extent of discrimination in the marketplace: Evidence from the field , 2004 .

[6]  J. Blandford The Nexus of Sexual Orientation and Gender in the Determination of Earnings , 2003 .

[7]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[8]  Patrick W. Corrigan,et al.  The Public Stigma of Mental Illness and Drug Addiction , 2009 .

[9]  Lowell J. Taylor,et al.  The Earnings Effects of Sexual Orientation , 2003 .

[10]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Gregory M. Herek,et al.  Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey , 1993 .

[12]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Effect of intentionality on willingness to reciprocate a favor , 1972 .

[13]  Charlotte Steeh,et al.  Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations , 1985 .

[14]  S. Gelman,et al.  The Perennial Debate: Nature, Nurture, or Choice? Black and White Americans’ Explanations for Individual Differences , 2009, Review of general psychology : journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association.

[15]  G. Herek,et al.  Black heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men in the United States , 1995 .

[16]  M. Badgett The Wage Effects of Sexual Orientation Discrimination , 1995 .

[17]  D. R. Shaffer,et al.  Effects of Victims' Race and Organizational Affiliation on Receiving Help from Blacks and Whites , 1980 .

[18]  Imran Rasul,et al.  Field Experiments in Labor Economics , 2010 .

[19]  Rainer Reisenzein,et al.  A Structural Equation Analysis of Weiner's Attribution-Affect Model of Helping Behavior , 1986 .

[20]  J. Mallozzi,et al.  Effects of sex type of dress and location on altruistic behavior , 1990 .

[21]  James R. Kluegel,et al.  Trends in whites' explanations of the black-white gap in socioeconomic status, 1977-1989 , 1990 .

[22]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  The Economics of Discrimination , 1957 .

[23]  Christopher S. Carpenter Sexual orientation, income, and non-pecuniary economic outcomes: new evidence from young lesbians in Australia , 2008 .

[24]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Race of Victim, Nonresponsive Bystanders, and Helping Behavior , 1982 .

[25]  M. Baldwin,et al.  Labor market discrimination against men with disabilities , 1994 .

[26]  B. Weiner,et al.  An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  K. Arrow The Theory of Discrimination , 1971 .

[28]  P. Riach,et al.  Field Experiments of Discrimination in the Market Place , 2002 .

[29]  S. Gaertner,et al.  Effects of Race on the Elicitation of Helping Behavior: The Wrong Number Technique. , 1971 .

[30]  P. B. Harper Eloquence and Epitaph: Black Nationalism and the Homophobic Impulse in Responses to the Death of Max Robinson , 1991 .

[31]  B. Black,et al.  The Relationship Between Attitudes: Homophobia and Sexism Among Social Work Students , 1998 .

[32]  M. Joslyn,et al.  Beliefs About the Origins of Homosexuality and Support For Gay Rights An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory , 2008 .

[33]  V. Derlega,et al.  Cooperation and Helping Behavior: Theories and Research , 1982 .

[34]  E. Phelps The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism , 1972 .

[35]  C. Pierret,et al.  Employer Learning and Statistical Discrimination , 1997 .

[36]  M. Baldwin,et al.  Labor Market Discrimination against Women with Disabilities , 1995 .

[37]  P. Berkhout,et al.  Effects of sexual preferences on earnings in the Netherlands , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[38]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[39]  Bethany A Teachman,et al.  Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: the impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. , 2003, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[40]  A. C. Pigou Economics of welfare , 1920 .

[41]  S. West,et al.  Helping a motorist in distress: The effects of sex, race, and neighborhood. , 1975 .

[42]  Bibb Latané,et al.  A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention ☆ , 1969 .