Future space mission concepts and designs pose many networking challenges for command, telemetry, and science data applications with diverse end-to-end data delivery needs. For future end-to-end architecture designs, a key challenge is meeting expected application quality of service requirements for multiple simultaneous mission data flows with options to use diverse onboard local data buses, commercial ground networks, and multiple satellite relay constellations in LEO, MEO, GEO, or even deep space relay links. Effectively utilizing a complex network topology requires orchestration and direction that spans the many discrete, individually addressable computer systems, which cause them to act in concert to achieve the overall network goals. The system must be intelligent enough to not only function under nominal conditions, but also adapt to unexpected situations, and reorganize or adapt to perform roles not originally intended for the system or explicitly programmed. This paper describes architecture features of cognitive networking within the future NASA space communications infrastructure, and interacting with the legacy systems and infrastructure in the meantime. The paper begins by discussing the need for increased automation, including inter-system collaboration. This discussion motivates the features of an architecture including cognitive networking for future missions and relays, interoperating with both existing endpoint-based networking models and emerging information-centric models. From this basis, we discuss progress on a proof-of-concept implementation of this architecture as a cognitive networking on-orbit application on the SCaN Testbed attached to the International Space Station.
[1]
James Schiers.
An Update on NASA's Space Communication Architecture from 2010 to 2030
,
2008
.
[2]
Thomas J. Kacpura,et al.
Software defined radio architecture contributions to next generation space communications
,
2015,
2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference.
[3]
Bengt Ahlgren,et al.
A survey of information-centric networking
,
2012,
IEEE Communications Magazine.
[4]
Sandra K. Johnson,et al.
In-Space Networking On NASA's SCaN Testbed
,
2016
.
[5]
Esther Jennings,et al.
Architecting the Communication and Navigation Networks for NASA's Space Exploration Systems
,
2007,
2007 IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering.
[6]
Andrea Zanella,et al.
Cognition-Based Networks: A New Perspective on Network Optimization Using Learning and Distributed Intelligence
,
2015,
IEEE Access.
[7]
Kul B. Bhasin,et al.
NASA Integrated Space Communications Network
,
2012
.
[8]
Ryan W. Thomas,et al.
Cognitive networks
,
2005,
First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..
[9]
Gregory S. Hornby,et al.
Automated Antenna Design with Evolutionary Algorithms
,
2006
.
[10]
Joseph Mitola,et al.
Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal
,
1999,
IEEE Wirel. Commun..
[11]
Jeffrey O. Kephart,et al.
The Vision of Autonomic Computing
,
2003,
Computer.
[12]
Brian Barritt,et al.
Temporospatial SDN for Aerospace Communications
,
2015
.