Conceptual Modeling in Product Design within Virtual Reality Environments: Interaction and Geometry Representation

Digitalization has already permeated most of the design activities, but in spite of this, the generation of visual representations of concepts in the product design domain still relies on analog tools in real world contexts. Despite immersive 3D technologies, such as Virtual Reality, have become widely available and a ordable, most designers still make use of pencils and paper sheets, or their digital counterparts, to sketch their initial ideas on 2D supports. This study aims at investigating the reasons behind the mismatch between the rapid growth of immersive technologies and their scarce adoption in the conceptual design activities. Based on the analysis of the state of the art, a classi cation of the approaches proposing new ways to conduct conceptual representation of products has been drawn. The geometry representation, i.e. parametric or polygonal, and the interaction methods have been taken as metrics to categorize previous works. Weak connections between the modeling paradigm implemented and the interaction methods, lack of spatial faithfulness, ergonomic concerns and the need for quantitative metrics to compare objectively the data resulting from di erent testing sessions across the various studies are the main issues identi ed. In order to get concrete evidence of such thoughts, an experimental session has been devised with users from di erent backgrounds. They were asked to make conceptual sketches of a computer mouse in a traditional fashion, i.e. with pen and paper, and using two o -theshelf Virtual Reality applications, based on 3D sketching and 3D sculpting respectively. The results are discussed qualitatively by visually comparing the sketches made by the testers, enriched by information deducted by surveying the users before and after the experiments. By comparing the sketches made by each user with the three procedures, preliminary results indicate that VR systems don't bring dramatic improvements compared to traditional 2D sketching tools. Furthermore, despite being enjoyable, VR systems caused physical fatigue, which is a problem that basically does not a ect 2D sketching. Despite the size of the sample cannot provide statistical evidence, the outcomes provided good indications about the technology readiness level of Virtual Reality as a conceptual design tool, paving the way for future research directions.

[1]  EunSook Kwon,et al.  Conceptual product design in digital and traditional sketching environments: a comparative exploratory study , 2018 .

[2]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[3]  Woojin Park,et al.  A Review on Object Manipulation Techniques in Virtual Environments and their Performance Metrics , 2013 .

[4]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Human performance evaluation of manipulation schemes in virtual environments , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[5]  Mohamed Rashid Embi,et al.  Critical analysis of key determinants and barriers to digital innovation adoption among architectural organizations , 2014 .

[6]  Joshua D. Summers,et al.  Representation: Metrics for Analyzing Sketches — A Critical Survey , 2012 .

[7]  Franca Giannini,et al.  A Survey of Immersive Systems for Shape Manipulation , 2019 .

[8]  Umberto Cugini,et al.  Freehand Gesture and Tactile Interaction for Shape Design , 2016, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[9]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[10]  Jinsheng Kang,et al.  Instant 3D design concept generation and visualization by real-time hand gesture recognition , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[11]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[12]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Conceptual Three-Dimensional Modeling Using Intuitive Gesture-Based Midair Three-Dimensional Sketching Technique , 2018, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[13]  John L. Salmon,et al.  Exploration and evaluation of CAD modeling in virtual reality , 2017 .

[14]  Rubaiat Habib Kazi,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Sketching on Surfaces in VR , 2017, CHI.

[15]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Formalizing the Design, Evaluation, and Application of Interaction Techniques for Immersive Virtual Environments , 1999, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[16]  Gilsoo Jang,et al.  Deforming NURBS Surfaces to Target Curves for Immersive VR Sketching , 2010, IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Johann Habakuk Israel,et al.  Investigating the Learnability of Immersive Free-Hand Sketching , 2010, SBIM.

[18]  Brigitte Moench,et al.  Engineering Design A Systematic Approach , 2016 .

[19]  Uday Athavankar,et al.  Blindfolded Classroom: Getting Design Students to Use Mental Imagery , 2003 .

[20]  Mark Mine,et al.  Principles, interactions and devices for real-world immersive modeling , 2015, Comput. Graph..

[21]  Alexei Sourin,et al.  Mid-air interaction with optical tracking for 3D modeling , 2018, Comput. Graph..

[22]  Karthik Ramani,et al.  Proto-TAI++: Exploring Perceptually Consistent Creation of Planar Shape Assemblies Through Multimodal Tangible Interactions , 2016, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[23]  Daniele Regazzoni,et al.  A 3D virtual sketching system using NURBS surfaces and leap motion controller , 2019 .

[24]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[25]  Gilberto Osorio-Gómez,et al.  AIR-MODELLING: A tool for gesture-based solid modelling in context during early design stages in AR environments , 2015, Comput. Ind..

[26]  Joaquim A. Jorge,et al.  Mockup Builder: 3D modeling on and above the surface , 2013, Comput. Graph..

[27]  Tommaso Ingrassia,et al.  VirDe: a new virtual reality design approach , 2009 .

[28]  Alla Sheffer,et al.  SurfaceBrush , 2019, ACM Trans. Graph..