Multi-Perspective Persuasion by a Council of Virtual Coaches

Multi-perspective group persuasion by virtual characters has the potential to improve behaviour change support systems by making them more persuasive, satisfying to use, and effective at achieving value-added user outcomes. In this paper, we present a study into multi-perspective persuasion by a coaching team of virtual characters, in which we tried to investigate the effects of inter-coach discussion on multi-perspective persuasion on the topic of weight loss. We investigated the effects of inter-coach discussion during a coaching session with respect to the perception of the coaches, and their ability to coach. We compared two conditions. In one condition the coaches merely gave tips, and in the other they had brief discussions in between the tips. We used questionnaires, and held interviews to gain more insight on the perception of the council, and to determine whether commitment to tips changed due to intercoach discussion. We found a minor difference in perception of the council between the conditions. We did not find perceived coaching ability to differ. Participants had a preference for the inter-coach discussion when they noticed the difference between conditions. There was a minor influence of inter-coach discussion on reflection on which approach to choose and why. There was a small increase in commitment to advice when inter-coach discussion had taken place. Finally, feedback from the interviews indicated the type of discussion the coaches have, influences how the participants perceived it. We conclude that inter-coach discussion between agents during group interaction, when noticed, is preferred by people. We also suggest that well-designed and pretested persuasive group discussion dialogues performed by virtual agents could have an effect on changing the opinions people have.

[1]  D. Cortese,et al.  Teamwork in Health Care , 2014, Nursing administration quarterly.

[2]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Gabriel Szulanski,et al.  The Effects of Conflict Types, Dimensions, and Emergent States on Group Outcomes , 2008 .

[4]  Catherine Pelachaud,et al.  Is Two Better than One?: Effects of Multiple Agents on User Persuasion , 2018, IVA.

[5]  R. Thomson,et al.  Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice , 2012, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[6]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  E. Ream,et al.  Teamwork: a concept analysis. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  David R. Traum,et al.  Multi-party, Multi-issue, Multi-strategy Negotiation for Multi-modal Virtual Agents , 2008, IVA.

[9]  J. Yardley,et al.  An Exploratory Examination of the Coaching Behavior Scale for Sport , 2016 .

[10]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[11]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  Council of Coaches - A Novel Holistic Behavior Change Coaching Approach , 2018, ICT4AWE.

[12]  A. Jenness,et al.  The role of discussion in changing opinion regarding a matter of fact. , 1932 .

[13]  Ryuichiro Higashinaka,et al.  Effects of Conversational Agents on Human Communication in Thought-Evoking Multi-Party Dialogues , 2009, SIGDIAL Conference.