A bridging model prediction of the ultimate strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads

Abstract A micromechanical prediction procedure is described in this paper to simulate the progressive failure strength of a composite laminate subjected to multiaxial loading. Casting the loading in an incremental form, the stress increments exerted on each lamina in the laminate can be determined based on the instantaneous stiffness matrix of the lamina. A recently developed micromechanics model, the bridging model, is used to define this instantaneous stiffness matrix and to relate the stress increments in the constituent fiber and rein materials of the lamina with those stress increments exerted on it. The thermal residual stresses generated in the constituents due to mismatch between coefficients of thermal expansion in the fiber and resin materials are clearly addressed and have been incorporated in the analysis. As long as one of the constituents attains its ultimate stress state, the lamina is considered to have failed and its contribution to the overall stiffness matrix of the laminate is reduced. A total reduction strategy is employed in the paper. In this way, the progressive failure process in the laminate can be understood, and the corresponding failure mode can be identified automatically. A generalized maximum normal stress criterion is adopted to detect the constituent failure. The prediction procedure has been applied to 14 different composite laminates where failure envelopes or stress–strain curves up to final failure subjected to biaxial loading are required. The predicted results have been reported in figures and data tables.

[1]  Z. Huang Simulation of inelastic response of multidirectional laminates based on stress failure criteria , 2000 .

[2]  G. Dvorak,et al.  On a Correspondence Between Mechanical and Thermal Effects in Two-Phase Composites , 1990 .

[3]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates , 1998 .

[4]  Zheng-ming Huang Micromechanical strength formulae of unidirectional composites , 1999 .

[5]  J. Berthelot,et al.  Composite Materials: Mechanical Behavior and Structural Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  Zheng-ming Huang,et al.  A Unified Micromechanical Model for the Mechanical Properties of Two Constituent Composite Materials. Part V: Laminate Strength , 2000 .

[7]  Zheng-ming Huang Strength formulae of unidirectional composites including thermal residual stresses , 2000 .

[8]  R. Gibson Principles of Composite Material Mechanics , 1994 .

[9]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Flexural failure behavior of laminated composites reinforced with braided fabrics , 2002 .

[10]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  Simulation of the mechanical properties of fibrous composites by the bridging micromechanics model , 2001 .

[11]  Zheng-ming Huang Progressive flexural failure analysis of laminated composites with knitted fabric reinforcement , 2004 .

[12]  Thierry Chotard,et al.  Experimental determination of TSAI failure tensorial terms Fij for unidirectional composite materials , 1995 .

[13]  Zheng-ming Huang,et al.  A Unified Micromechanical Model for the Mechanical Properties of Two Constituent Composite Materials. Part IV: Rubber-Elastic Behavior , 2000 .

[14]  Zheng-ming Huang Micromechanical life prediction for composite laminates , 2001 .

[15]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise , 1998 .

[16]  S. White,et al.  Stress analysis of fiber-reinforced composite materials , 1997 .

[17]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  The mechanical properties of composites reinforced with woven and braided fabrics , 2000 .

[18]  Zheng-Ming Huang,et al.  Micromechanical prediction of ultimate strength of transversely isotropic fibrous composites , 2001 .

[19]  Zheng-ming Huang Modeling Strength of Multidirectional Laminates under Thermo-Mechanical Loads , 2001 .

[20]  John W. Gillespie,et al.  Delaware composites design encyclopedia , 1989 .

[21]  C. Chamis Mechanics of Composite Materials: Past, Present and Future , 1989 .

[22]  Tarunjit S. Butalia,et al.  A strain-energy based failure criterion for non-linear analysis of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loading , 1998 .

[23]  A. Tay,et al.  A Micromechanical Approach to the Tensile Strength of a Knitted Fabric Composite , 1999 .

[24]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Micromechanical modeling approaches for the stiffness and strength of knitted fabric composites: a review and comparative study , 2000 .

[25]  Jacob Aboudi,et al.  Effective behavior of inelastic fiber-reinforced composites , 1984 .

[26]  N. J. Pagano,et al.  Interlaminar Stresses in Composite Laminates Under Uniform Axial Extension , 1970 .

[27]  S. Timoshenko History of strength of materials , 1953 .

[28]  J. N. Reddy,et al.  Theory and Analysis of Laminated Composite Plates , 1999 .

[29]  R. Kriz,et al.  Elastic moduli of transversely isotropic graphite fibers and their composites , 1979 .

[30]  Seeram Ramakrishna,et al.  Modeling the stress/strain behavior of a knitted fabric-reinforced elastomer composite , 2000 .

[31]  Mn Nahas,et al.  Survey of Failure and Post-Failure Theories of Laminated Fiber-Renforced Composites , 1986 .

[32]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Unified Micromechanical Model for Estimating Elastic, Elasto-Plastic and Strength Behaviors of Knitted Fabric Reinforced Composites , 2000 .

[33]  S. Tsai,et al.  Introduction to composite materials , 1980 .

[34]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES , 1998 .

[35]  J. Echaabi,et al.  REVIEW OF FAILURE CRITERIA OF FIBROUS COMPOSITE MATERIALS , 1996 .