The evolution of functionally referential meaning in a structured world.

Animal communication systems serve to transfer both motivational information--about the intentions or emotional state of the signaler--and referential information--about external objects. Although most animal calls seem to deal primarily with motivational information, those with a substantial referential component are particularly interesting because they invite comparison with words in human language. We present a game-theoretic model of the evolution of communication in a "structured world", where some situations may be more similar to one another than others, and therefore require similar responses. We find that breaking the symmetry in this way creates the possibility for a diverse array of evolutionarily stable communication systems. When the number of signals is limited, as in alarm calling, the system tends to evolve to group together situations which require similar responses. We use this observation to make some predictions about the situations in which primarily motivational or referential communication systems will evolve.

[1]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[3]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[4]  D. McNeill Language and species , 1992, International Journal of Primatology.

[5]  R. Selten A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetric animal conflicts. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Peter Marler,et al.  On the meaning of alarm calls: functional reference in an avian vocal system , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  P. Marler,et al.  Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  C. Allen,et al.  The evolution of reference. , 1998 .

[9]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[10]  H. Papoušek,et al.  Nonverbal Vocal Communication: Comparative and Developmental Approaches , 2008 .

[11]  V. Tilden,et al.  Cost and Conflict , 1987, Western journal of nursing research.

[12]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[13]  W. Strange Evolution of language. , 1984, JAMA.

[14]  M. Manser,et al.  The acoustic structure of suricates' alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  D. Rendall,et al.  Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling , 2001 .

[16]  M. Hauser,et al.  Functional referents and acoustic similarity: field playback experiments with rhesus monkeys , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  M. Nowak,et al.  Nash equilibria for an evolutionary language game , 2000, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  Colin Allen,et al.  The evolution of mind , 1998 .

[19]  W. Dittus Toque macaque food calls: Semantic communication concerning food distribution in the environment , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  E. Hill Journal of Theoretical Biology , 1961, Nature.

[21]  Karl H. Schlag,et al.  Evolutionarily stable sets , 2000, Int. J. Game Theory.

[22]  P. Hammerstein Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[23]  M. Feldman,et al.  Initial Increase of New Mutants and Some Continuity Properties of ESS in Two-Locus Systems , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[24]  ’ JEFFREYR.WALTERS,et al.  ANTI-PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF LAPWINGS : FIELD EVIDENCE OF DISCRIMINATIVE ABILITIES , 2002 .

[25]  K. Wärneryd Cheap Talk, Coordination, and Evolutionary Stability , 1993 .

[26]  S. Pinker,et al.  The faculty of language: what's special about it? , 2005, Cognition.

[27]  P. Marler,et al.  Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) screams: Representational signalling in the recruitment of agonistic aid , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  S. Savage-Rumbaugh How monkeys see the world , 1992, International Journal of Primatology.

[29]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Signalling among relatives. II. Beyond the tower of Babel. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[30]  David Lewis Convention: A Philosophical Study , 1986 .

[31]  R. Kirk CONVENTION: A PHILOSOPHICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[32]  K. Zuberbühler,et al.  Diana monkey long-distance calls: messages for conspecifics and predators , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Willem H. Zuidema Optimal Communication in a Noisy and Heterogeneous Environment , 2003, ECAL.

[34]  B. Grant,et al.  Genetics and the origin of bird species. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M A Nowak,et al.  An error limit for the evolution of language , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  Christopher S. Evans,et al.  Chicken food calls are functionally referential , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Signaling among relatives. III. Talk is cheap. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  James R. Hurford,et al.  Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device , 1989 .

[39]  M Moynihan,et al.  Control, suppression, decay, disappearance and replacement of displays. , 1970, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  J. Waas The risks and benefits of signalling aggressive motivation: a study of cave-dwelling little blue penguins , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.