Use of MRI-ultrasound Fusion to Achieve Targeted Prostate Biopsy.

Here, we present a protocol to perform targeted prostate biopsy using a magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound (MRI/US) fusion system. Prostate cancer has traditionally been diagnosed via transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy. Though considered the gold standard, TRUS is unable to visualize most prostate cancer lesions and therefore requires sampling of the entire prostate. This biopsy method often undergrades prostate cancer and fails to detect up to 35% of cancers on initial biopsy. Prostate MRI has been shown to have excellent sensitivity in the detection of cancerous lesions, and advancements in MRI technology during the last decade have led to the development of targeted biopsy. In targeted biopsy, a software platform overlays MRI data onto live TRUS images to create a fused MRI/US three-dimensional model of the prostate. Regions suspicious for malignancy on MRI are contoured by a radiologist, uploaded into the fusion system, and then displayed within the live MRI/US fused model. The urologist is then able to directly biopsy these targets. When compared to conventional TRUS biopsy, MRI/US fusion technology has been demonstrated to improve the detection of clinically significant cancer while reducing insignificant cancer detection. This technology, therefore, has the potential to diagnose prostate cancer primarily in men who would benefit from treatment.

[1]  C C Schulman,et al.  Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[2]  P Puech,et al.  Detecting prostate cancer with MRI - why and how. , 2012, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[3]  D. Nieboer,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[4]  David Y. Lu,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[5]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel. , 2017, European urology.

[6]  U. Patel,et al.  Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2006, Clinical radiology.

[7]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  MRI–ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.

[8]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[9]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging‐Ultrasound Fusion for Guidance , 2017, The Journal of urology.

[10]  T. Stamey,et al.  Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[11]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[12]  D. Margolis,et al.  MRI‐Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate‐Cancer Diagnosis , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[14]  L. Holmberg,et al.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. , 1997, Urology.

[15]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance‐ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies , 2016, Cancer.

[16]  T. Stamey,et al.  Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[17]  M. Parmar,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confi rmatory study , 2018 .

[18]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[19]  E. Messing,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Cribriform Morphology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Correlated with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens , 2018, The Journal of urology.

[20]  S. Taneja Re: Prostate Cancer Detection with Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy: The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[21]  R D Williams,et al.  Anatomy and pathology of the male pelvis by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  L. Marks,et al.  MR-guided biopsy and focal therapy: new options for prostate cancer management , 2017, Current opinion in urology.