The differentiated role of organizational ambidexterity and organizational innovation in the subsidiary reverse knowledge transfer process

Purpose This paper underscores how organizational ambidexterity and organizational innovation play differentiated roles in the subsidiary reverse knowledge transfers (RKT). The authors argue that both organizational ambidexterity and organizational innovation play a positive but differentiated role in the RKT process in that the former positively influences subsidiary knowledge creation, whereas the latter positively influences subsidiary knowledge transfers. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 289 foreign subsidiaries operating in Brazil. Hypotheses were developed and tested by applying partial least squares structural equation modeling. Findings The results supported the hypotheses and showed that organizational ambidexterity promotes knowledge creation, and that organizational innovation facilitates knowledge transfers. Research limitations/implications The paper offers implications with regard to drivers of subsidiary investments and actions of subsidiary managers vis-à-vis the subsidiary objectives of knowledge creation and/or transfers. Originality/value Showing the different roles of organizational ambidexterity and organizational innovation, this paper reveals some underlying mechanisms of the RKT process and contributes by explaining the competitive heterogeneity of subsidiaries, with impacts on subsidiary management’s evolutionary and resource dependence perspective.

[1]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[2]  Teck-Yong Eng,et al.  Exploring a dynamic framework of innovative capability: a theoretical integration of technological and marketing capabilities , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[4]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations , 2014 .

[5]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  BUILDING FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: THE ROLE OF SUBSIDIARY INITIATIVE , 1998 .

[6]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  The good, the bad, and the ugly: Technology transfer competence, rent-seeking, and bargaining power , 2012 .

[7]  Dovev Lavie,et al.  Ambidexterity Under Scrutiny: Exploration and Exploitation Via Internal Organization, Alliances, and Acquisitions , 2014 .

[8]  Chie-Bein Chen,et al.  Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty , 2008 .

[9]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Subsidiary knowledge flows in multinational corporations: Research accomplishments, gaps, and opportunities , 2012 .

[10]  Nathalie De Marcellis-Warin,et al.  Reverse innovation: a systematic literature review , 2017 .

[11]  Giacomo Marzi,et al.  The role of geographical distance on the relationship between cultural intelligence and knowledge transfer , 2018, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[12]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Developed country MNEs investing in developing economies: Progress and prospect , 2019, Journal of International Business Studies.

[13]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success , 2003 .

[14]  Paloma Miravitlles,et al.  Knowledge sharing and subsidiary R&D mandate development: A matter of dual embeddedness , 2014 .

[15]  Alain Verbeke,et al.  Fifty Years of International Business Theory and Beyond , 2011 .

[16]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM , 2002, Journal of International Business Studies.

[17]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs , 1994 .

[18]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Subsidiary entrepreneurship, internal and external competitive forces, and subsidiary performance , 2005 .

[19]  Dennys Eduardo Rossetto,et al.  Innovation capabilities for global R&D projects in subsidiaries , 2019, European Journal of Innovation Management.

[20]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[21]  S. Beugelsdijk,et al.  Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[22]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  The contribution of local environments to competence creation in multinational enterprises , 2014 .

[23]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes , 2009 .

[24]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization , 2000 .

[25]  A. Giroud,et al.  MNEs and FSAs: Network knowledge, strategic orientation and performance , 2015 .

[26]  Paulo N. Figueiredo,et al.  Learning, capability accumulation and firms differences: evidence from latecomer steel , 2003 .

[27]  Muhammad Mustafa Raziq,et al.  Linking corporate entrepreneurship, expatriation and reverse knowledge transfers , 2019, European Journal of Innovation Management.

[28]  Dirceu da Silva,et al.  Modelagem de Equações Estruturais com Utilização do Smartpls , 2014 .

[29]  Young Choon Kim,et al.  Learning from age difference: Interorganizational learning and survival in Japanese foreign subsidiaries , 2012 .

[30]  Larissa Rabbiosi,et al.  Subsidiary Roles and Reverse Knowledge Transfer: An Investigation of the Effects of Coordination Mechanisms , 2011 .

[31]  Gabriel R. G. Benito,et al.  Institutional Distance and MNE‐subsidiary Initiative Collaboration: The Role of Dual Embeddedness , 2021 .

[32]  Tony C. Garrett,et al.  Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance , 2017, Journal of Business Research.

[33]  Vijay Govindarajan,et al.  Engineering Reverse Innovations , 2015 .

[34]  César Camisón,et al.  Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance , 2014 .

[35]  R. Narula.  Exploring the paradox of competence‐creating subsidiaries : balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs , 2014 .

[36]  Lucia Piscitello,et al.  Reverse knowledge transfer in MNEs: : subsidiary innovativeness and entry modes , 2014 .

[37]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How MNC's subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities , 2017, J. Knowl. Manag..

[38]  Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez,et al.  Strategic knowledge management in subsidiaries and MNC performance. The role of the relational context , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[39]  S. Fang,et al.  The influence of knowledge networks on a firm’s innovative performance , 2016, Journal of Management & Organization.

[40]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Management innovation , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[41]  P. N. Figueiredo,et al.  The Role of Dual Embeddedness in the Innovative Performance of MNE Subsidiaries: Evidence from Brazil , 2011 .

[42]  Vijay Pereira,et al.  Investigating dynamic capabilities, agility and knowledge management within EMNEs-longitudinal evidence from Europe , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  Jan‐Erik Vahlne,et al.  Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability in the globalization of the multinational business enterprise (MBE): Case studies of AB Volvo and IKEA , 2017 .

[44]  Roberto Carlos Bernardes,et al.  The roles of external embeddedness and institutional distance in the subsidiary product/process innovation and R&D capacity , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[45]  Homin Chen,et al.  Resource dependency and parent–subsidiary capability transfers , 2012 .

[46]  Saul Estrin,et al.  Institutions, resources and entry strategies in emerging economies , 2009 .

[47]  Piers Steel,et al.  Complements or substitutes? A meta-analysis of the role of integration mechanisms for knowledge transfer in the MNE network , 2018, Journal of World Business.

[48]  Julia Hamprecht,et al.  Subsidiary Initiatives in the Institutional Environment , 2014 .

[49]  María Magdalena Jiménez-Barrionuevo,et al.  Transformational Leadership Influence on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Learning and Innovation , 2012 .

[50]  Maria Adenfelt,et al.  The development and sharing of knowledge by Centres of Excellence and transnational teams: A conceptual framework , 2008 .

[51]  F. Borini,et al.  Reverse innovation antecedents , 2016 .

[52]  Marina Dabić,et al.  The performance implications of knowledge management and strategic alignment of MNC subsidiaries , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[53]  Justin J. P. Jansen,et al.  Management Innovation and Leadership: The Moderating Role of Organizational Size , 2012 .

[54]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices , 2009 .

[55]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Weight Versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention From Corporate Headquarters , 2008 .

[56]  Won-Sik Hwang,et al.  A mediating role of innovation capability between entrepreneurial competencies and competitive advantage , 2020, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[57]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  Corporate entrepreneurship in network organizations:: How subsidiary initiative drives internal market efficiency , 1998 .

[58]  C. S. Kogut,et al.  Reverse Knowledge Transfer in Multinational Companies: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017 .

[59]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  Headquarters’ Attention and Its Effect on Subsidiary Performance , 2010 .

[60]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Subsidiary power: Loaned or owned? The lenses of agency theory and resource dependence theory , 2019, Global Strategy Journal.

[61]  Rene Belderbos,et al.  Entry Mode, Organizational Learning and R&D in Foreign Affiliates: Evidence from japanese Firms , 2003 .

[62]  Nishant Kumar,et al.  Managing reverse knowledge flow in multinational corporations , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[63]  J. Wincent,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and International New Entry: The Moderating Role of Autonomy and Structures in Subsidiaries , 2016 .

[64]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS , 2002 .

[65]  Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.  Relevant factors for tacit knowledge transfer within organisations , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[66]  S. Hart,et al.  Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model , 2004 .

[67]  E. Vaara,et al.  Cultural differences and capability transfer in cross-border acquisitions: the mediating roles of capability complementarity, absorptive capacity, and social integration , 2007 .

[68]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation , 1993 .

[69]  D. Teece,et al.  The Dynamic Capabilities of Meta-Multinationals , 2016 .

[70]  A. Ferraris,et al.  Rethinking the literature on “multiple embeddedness” and subsidiary-specific advantages , 2014 .

[71]  Gabriel R. G. Benito,et al.  From local to global innovation: The role of subsidiaries’ external relational embeddedness in an emerging market , 2019, International Business Review.

[72]  Snejina Michailova,et al.  Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries , 2015 .

[73]  A. Rugman,et al.  Subsidiary‐specific advantages in multinational enterprises , 2001 .

[74]  P. Naudé,et al.  Reverse Knowledge Transfer and Subsidiary Power , 2015 .

[75]  Tina C. Ambos,et al.  What are the consequences of initiative-taking in multinational subsidiaries? , 2010 .

[76]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[77]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[78]  Patrocinio Zaragoza-Sáez,et al.  Relational capital inside multinationals , 2011 .

[79]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[80]  Ajai S. Gaur,et al.  MNC strategy, knowledge transfer context, and knowledge flow in MNEs , 2019, J. Knowl. Manag..

[81]  C. Dhanaraj,et al.  Developing new products in emerging markets , 2016 .

[82]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Information technology, knowledge management and environmental dynamism as drivers of innovation ambidexterity: a study in SMEs , 2018, J. Knowl. Manag..

[83]  Ulf Andersson,et al.  Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? , 2011 .

[84]  Julian Birkinshaw,et al.  How Do Firms Adapt to Discontinuous Change? Bridging the Dynamic Capabilities and Ambidexterity Perspectives , 2016 .

[85]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Strategies for Managing Internal Competition , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[86]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world , 2011 .

[87]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[88]  A. Schotter,et al.  Managing the MNE subsidiary: Advancing a multi-level and dynamic research agenda , 2020, Journal of International Business Studies.

[89]  S. Winter.  Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[90]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  From Cost to Frugal and Reverse Innovation: Mapping the Field and Implications for Global Competitiveness , 2014 .

[91]  Alicia Bolívar-Cruz,et al.  Successful replication of knowledge in the growth of service organizations: evidence from Spanish hotel chains , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[92]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Managing Power in the Multinational Corporation: How Low-Power Actors Gain Influence , 2008 .

[93]  Xiangyang Wang,et al.  Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As: the mediating role of knowledge integration from a routine-based view , 2020, J. Knowl. Manag..

[94]  Olli-Pekka Kauppila,et al.  Creating ambidexterity by integrating and balancing structurally separate interorganizational partnerships , 2010 .

[95]  David G. Hoopes,et al.  A capability-based view of competitive heterogeneity , 2008 .

[96]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[97]  Yonggui Wang,et al.  Reverse transfer of innovation and subsidiary power: A moderated mediation model , 2019, Journal of Business Research.