An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment Following Long Adult Lumbar Instrumentation and Fusion to L5 or S1: Can We Predict Ideal Lumbar Lordosis?

Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To determine factors controlling sagittal spinal balance after long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion from the thoracolumbar spine to L5 or S1. Summary of Background Data. To our knowledge, no study on postoperative sagittal balance following long adult spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1 has been published. Methods. A clinical and radiographic assessment of 80 patients with adult lumbar deformity (average age 53.4 years) who underwent long (average 7.6 vertebrae, 5–11 vertebrae) segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion from the thoracolumbar spine to the L5–S1 (average 4.5 years, 2–15.8-year follow-up) was performed. We defined the optimal sagittal balance (n = 42) group, the distance from C7 plumb to superior posterior endplate of S1 ≤3.0 cm, and the suboptimal sagittal balance (n = 38) group, the distance from C7 plumb to superior posterior endplate of S1 >3.0 cm at ultimate follow-up. Results. The optimal sagittal balance group (C7 plumb, average −0.6 ± 2.5 cm) had the larger average angle differences between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis (P < 0.0001), preoperative smaller pelvic incidence (P = 0.007), smaller average thoracolumbar junctional angle (T10-L2) increase (P < 0.0001), and bigger lumbar lordosis angle increase (P = 0.014) at ultimate follow-up. Patients with optimal sagittal balance at ultimate follow-up had significantly higher total Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcome scores than those with suboptimal sagittal balance (P = 0.015). Risk factors that were statistically significant for the suboptimal sagittal balance group included pelvic incidence compared with lumbar lordosis (≥45°) before surgery (vs.— <45°, P = 0.009), smaller lumbar lordosis compared with thoracic kyphosis (<20°) at 8 weeks postoperatively (vs.— ≥20°, P = 0.013), and older than 55 years of age at surgery (vs.— 55 years or younger, P = 0.024). Conclusion. A sagittal Cobb angle difference between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis of >20° (higher lumbar lordosis) is advisable in most circumstances to achieve optimal sagittal balance.

[1]  S. Suk,et al.  Incidence of Proximal Adjacent Failure in Adult Lumbar Deformity Correction Based on Proximal Fusion Level , 2007, Asian spine journal.

[2]  L. Lenke,et al.  Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Following Long Instrumented Posterior Spinal Fusion: Incidence, Outcomes, and Risk Factor Analysis , 2005, Spine.

[3]  William Horton,et al.  Correlation of Radiographic Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[4]  M. Swank.  7:58 Adjacent segment failure above lumbosacral fusions instrumented to L1 or L2 , 2002 .

[5]  F. T. Wetzel,et al.  Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  S. Hansen,et al.  Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[7]  T. Lowe,et al.  Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. , 1999, Spine.

[8]  T. Albert,et al.  Management of degenerative disc disease above an L5-S1 segment requiring arthrodesis. , 1999, Spine.

[9]  P. Korovessis,et al.  Segmental roentgenographic analysis of vertebral inclination on sagittal plane in asymptomatic versus chronic low back pain patients. , 1999, Journal of spinal disorders.

[10]  R. Jackson,et al.  Compensatory Spinopelvic Balance Over the Hip Axis and Better Reliability in Measuring Lordosis to the Pelvic Radius on Standing Lateral Radiographs of Adult Volunteers and Patients , 1998, Spine.

[11]  L. Lenke,et al.  Comparison of Standing Sagittal Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adolescents and Adults , 1998, Spine.

[12]  F. Schwab,et al.  Management of Flatback and Related Kyphotic Decompensation Syndromes , 1997, Spine.

[13]  John H. Evans,et al.  Effects of Short Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Biomechanics of Neighboring Unfused Segments , 1996, Spine.

[14]  Kevin W. McEnery,et al.  An Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Alignment in 100 Asymptomatic Middle and Older Aged Volunteers , 1995, Spine.

[15]  S. L. Griffith,et al.  Intradiscal Pressure Measurements Above an Instrumented Fusion: A Cadaveric Study , 1995, Spine.

[16]  J. Lewis,et al.  Comparison of In Vivo and In Vitro Adjacent Segment Motion After Lumbar Fusion , 1994, Spine.

[17]  R. Jackson,et al.  Radiographic Analysis of Sagittal Plane Alignment and Balance in Standing Volunteers and Patients with Low Back Pain Matched for Age, Sex, and Size: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Study , 1994, Spine.

[18]  V K Goel,et al.  Effect of Disc Degeneration at One Level on the Adjacent Level in Axial Mode , 1991, Spine.

[19]  M Bernhardt,et al.  Segmental Analysis of the Sagittal Plane Alignment of the Normal Thoracic and Lumbar Spines and Thoracolumbar Junction , 1989, Spine.

[20]  CASEY K. LEE,et al.  Accelerated Degeneration of the Segment Adjacent to a Lumbar Fusion , 1988, Spine.

[21]  Casey K. Lee,et al.  Biomechanics of Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion in Combined Compression-Torsion Loads , 1986, Spine.

[22]  T. Beeker,et al.  Toward Standards for Posture: Postural Characteristics of the Lower Back System in Normal and Pathologic Conditions , 1985, Spine.

[23]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.