MODELING MECHANICAL CELL DAMAGE IN THE BIOPRINTING PROCESS EMPLOYING A CONICAL NEEDLE

Biofabrication technologies involve the incorporation of living cells into various bioproducts by employing different cell manipulation techniques. Among them, bioprinting, delivering cell suspension through a fine needle under pressurized air, has been widely used because of its capability of precise process control. In the cell-printing process of bioprinting, cells are exposed to fluid stresses due to the velocity gradient in the fine needle. If the stresses exceed a certain level, the cell membrane may be overstretched, leading to membrane failure and thus causing mechanical cell damage. Modeling the mechanical cell damage in the bioprinting process is a challenging task due to the complex fluid flow and cell deformation involved. This paper introduces a novel method based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to represent the mechanical cell damage in the bioprinting process using a conical needle. Specifically, the cell deformation and movement during the cell-fluid interaction processes were represented by the immersed boundary method (IBM). A strain energy density (SED)-based cell damage criterion was developed and used to determine cell damage. Experiments were performed by using 3T3 fibroblasts and the results agree well with the proposed model.

[1]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[2]  Xiongbiao Chen,et al.  Effect of needle geometry on flow rate and cell damage in the dispensing‐based biofabrication process , 2011, Biotechnology progress.

[3]  A. Popel,et al.  Large deformation of red blood cell ghosts in a simple shear flow. , 1998, Physics of fluids.

[4]  Xiaoyu Tian,et al.  Modeling of Flow Rate, Pore Size, and Porosity for the Dispensing-Based Tissue Scaffolds Fabrication , 2009 .

[5]  Aleksander S Popel,et al.  Computational fluid dynamic simulation of aggregation of deformable cells in a shear flow. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[6]  W. Hennink,et al.  Organ printing: the future of bone regeneration? , 2011, Trends in biotechnology.

[7]  Gianluca Iaccarino,et al.  IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHODS , 2005 .

[8]  Guifang Gao,et al.  Accelerated myotube formation using bioprinting technology for biosensor applications , 2012, Biotechnology Letters.

[9]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Wei Sun,et al.  Biofabrication of a three-dimensional liver micro-organ as an in vitro drug metabolism model , 2010, Biofabrication.

[11]  Sheila MacNeil,et al.  The development of a 3D immunocompetent model of human skin , 2013, Biofabrication.

[12]  Hu Yang,et al.  Recent advances in inkjet dispensing technologies: applications in drug discovery , 2012, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[13]  Shinil K. Shah,et al.  Effect of needle diameter and flow rate on rat and human mesenchymal stromal cell characterization and viability. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[14]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Evaluation of cell viability and functionality in vessel-like bioprintable cell-laden tubular channels. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[15]  Massimo Morbidelli,et al.  Induction of mammalian cell death by simple shear and extensional flows , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  Dominique Barthès-Biesel,et al.  Effect of constitutive laws for two-dimensional membranes on flow-induced capsule deformation , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Brian A. Aguado,et al.  Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[18]  Wei Sun,et al.  Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[19]  Michele Marcolongo,et al.  Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes. , 2009, Biotechnology journal.

[20]  Jonathan B. Freund,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Flowing Blood Cells , 2014 .

[21]  Xiaoyu Tian,et al.  Modeling process-induced cell damage in the biodispensing process. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[22]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[23]  K. Barbee Mechanical Cell Injury , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: from bioprinter to organ biofabrication line. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[25]  V Mironov,et al.  Biofabrication: a 21st century manufacturing paradigm , 2009, Biofabrication.

[26]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Modeling prosthetic heart valves for numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart , 1980 .

[27]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  Organ printing: tissue spheroids as building blocks. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[28]  Jae Nam,et al.  Direct cell writing of 3D microorgan for in vitro pharmacokinetic model. , 2008, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[29]  P. Dubruel,et al.  The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability. , 2014, Biomaterials.