Towards the Reconstruction and Evaluation of Conceptual Model Quality Discourses - Methodical Framework and Application in the Context of Model Understandability
暂无分享,去创建一个
Peter Loos | Peter Fettke | Constantin Houy | Armella-Lucia Vella | Constantin Houy | P. Fettke | P. Loos | Armella-Lucia Vella | Peter Fettke
[1] Graeme G. Shanks,et al. Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework , 2003, Inf. Syst..
[2] Jan Mendling,et al. Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects , 2008, BPM.
[3] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: The SAMPO Approach , 1992, Comput. J..
[4] Andrew Gemino,et al. Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[5] Tok Wang Ling,et al. Conceptual Modeling – ER ’98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[6] Jan Mendling,et al. A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.
[7] Michael Rosemann,et al. Measuring Process Modelling Success , 2002, ECIS.
[8] Young-Gul Kim,et al. Comparing data modeling formalisms , 1995, CACM.
[9] Mario Piattini,et al. Metrics for data warehouse conceptual models understandability , 2007, Inf. Softw. Technol..
[10] Venkataraman Ramesh,et al. Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[11] Geert Poels,et al. Faculteit Economie En Bedrijfskunde Hoveniersberg 24 B-9000 Gent Object Class or Association Class? Testing the User Effect on Cardinality Interpretation , 2022 .
[12] Uwe Reyle,et al. Ontology-driven discourse analysis for information extraction , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[13] Peter Meso,et al. The Effects of Decomposition Quality and Multiple Forms of Information on Novices' Understanding of a Domain from a Conceptual Model , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[14] Zellig S. Harris,et al. Science Sublanguages and the Prospects for a Global Language of Science , 1988 .
[15] Werner Ulrich. A Philosophical Staircase for Information Systems Definition, Design, and Development: A Discursive Approach to Reflective Practice in ISD (Part 1) , 2001 .
[16] Christian Janiesch,et al. Exploration of Conceptual Models: Application of the GOM Framework , 2005 .
[17] John Krogstie,et al. Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..
[18] Terry Halpin,et al. Fact-Oriented Modeling: Past, Present and Future , 2007 .
[19] Daniel L. Moody,et al. Validation of a method for representing large entity relationship models : An action research study , 2002, ECIS.
[20] Bernhard Thalheim,et al. Conceptual Modeling — ER '96 , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[21] Ulrich Frank,et al. Evaluation of Reference Models , 2006 .
[22] Jan Mendling,et al. On a Quest for Good Process Models: The Cross-Connectivity Metric , 2008, CAiSE.
[23] Terry Winograd. A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work , 1987, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[24] Stijn Hoppenbrouwers,et al. Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation , 2005 .
[25] Ron Weber,et al. Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams , 1999, ICIS.
[26] Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al. Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering , 2007 .
[27] Kalle Lyytinen,et al. Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: A Comparison and Evaluation of SAMPO with OSSAD and ICN , 1992, Comput. J..
[28] Daniel L. Moody,et al. Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models , 1998, ER.
[29] Jan Mendling,et al. What Makes Process Models Understandable? , 2007, BPM.
[30] Andreas L. Opdahl,et al. Capturing Dependability Threats in Conceptual Modelling , 2007 .
[31] L. Hedges,et al. The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .
[32] Sergio Luján-Mora,et al. Empirical Validation of Metrics for Conceptual Models of Data Warehouses , 2004, CAiSE.
[33] Prashant Palvia,et al. The Impact of Conceptual Data Models on End-User Performance , 1992 .
[34] Jörg Becker,et al. Guidelines of Business Process Modeling , 2000, Business Process Management.
[35] Daniel L. Moody,et al. Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..
[36] Genny Tortora,et al. Data Model Comprehension: An Empirical Comparison of ER and UML Class Diagrams , 2008, 2008 16th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension.
[37] Daniel L. Moody,et al. Cognitive Load Effects on End User Understanding of Conceptual Models: An Experimental Analysis , 2004, ADBIS.
[38] Jan Recker,et al. The Effects of Content Presentation Format and User Characteristics on Novice Developers' Understanding of Process Models , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[39] Peter Fettke,et al. Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis , 2006 .
[40] Peter Loos,et al. Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective , 2005, Business Process Management.
[41] Jan Fabian Ehmke. Evaluation of Information Models , 2012 .
[42] Mario Piattini,et al. Defining and validating metrics for assessing the understandability of entity-relationship diagrams , 2008, Data Knowl. Eng..
[43] Michael Rebstock,et al. Usability of Modelling Languages for Model Interpretation: An Empirical Research Report , 2011, Wirtschaftsinformatik.
[44] Daniel L. Moody,et al. Complexity effects on end user understanding of data models : An experimental comparison of large data model representation methods , 2002, ECIS.
[45] Ritu Agarwal,et al. Comprehending Object and Process Models: An Empirical Study , 1999, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[46] Ron Weber,et al. Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..
[47] Mark Strembeck,et al. Influence Factors of Understanding Business Process Models , 2008, BIS.
[48] Peter Meso,et al. Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..
[49] Matt Germonprez,et al. Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[50] Jan Blommaert,et al. Discourse: A Critical Introduction. , 2008, Linguistische Berichte (LB).
[51] Ulrich Frank,et al. Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in information systems research , 2006 .
[52] Bruce Roberts,et al. Charlotte, North Carolina , 1958 .
[53] Peter Fettke,et al. How Conceptual Modeling Is Used , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[54] Justus D. Naumann,et al. The Effectiveness of Data Representation Characteristics on User Validation , 1985, ICIS.
[55] Erich Ortner,et al. Normative Language Approach - A Framework for Understanding , 1996, ER.
[56] Alan R. Hevner,et al. Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..
[57] J. Recker,et al. Does It Matter Which Process Modelling Language We Teach or Use? An Experimental Study on Understanding Process Modelling Languages without Formal Education , 2007 .
[58] Werner Ulrich,et al. Discourse , 2019, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology.
[59] Michela Bertolotto,et al. Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling, ER 2005 Workshops AOIS, BP-UML, CoMoGIS, eCOMO, and QoIS, Klagenfurt, Austria, October 24-28, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, ER.
[60] Martha E. Crosby,et al. The effect of graphic style on data model interpretation , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..