Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic screening.

The benefits of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with oestrogen are well known and have led to widespread usage of HRT in post-menopausal women. There is an increased relative risk of breast cancer with prolonged HRT use of 1.7 at worst and this does not warrant more frequent screening. HRT itself makes mammographic screening less effective by adversely affecting both the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography.A number of large studies have shown a reduction in the sensitivity of screening mammography of between 7% and 21% in current HRT users. This reduction in sensitivity is seen only in women over the age of 50 and is more marked when using single view mammography. The reduction in sensitivity is largely confined to those women who have a dense mammographic background pattern while on HRT. HRT use is also associated with a reduction in specificity of between 12% and almost 50%. This reduction in specificity is mainly found at incident screens. What can be done to minimize the adverse effects of HRT on mammographic screening? The imminent introduction of two views at all screens within the National Health Breast Screening Programme will be helpful. Short-term cessation of HRT use may deter attendance for screening by HRT users and is unproven. Combined oestrogen and progesterone preparations taken continuously appear to be particularly associated with adverse breast screening performance, while tibolone may have little effect on mammographic density. Manipulation of the type of HRT preparations used may allow the adverse effects of HRT on breast screening to be reduced.

[1]  E. Dudley,et al.  Use of hormone replacement therapy by Melbourne women. , 2010, Australian journal of public health.

[2]  G. Ersavasti,et al.  Mammographic changes in women receiving tibolone therapy. , 1998, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  J. Litherland,et al.  The effect of hormone replacement therapy on the sensitivity of screening mammograms. , 1999, Clinical radiology.

[4]  Linda Olson,et al.  Effects of Estrogen and EstrogenProgestin on Mammographic Parenchymal Density , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  L. Mclean,et al.  Unilateral increase in mammographic density with hormone replacement therapy. , 1994, Clinical radiology.

[6]  J. Estève,et al.  Hormone replacement therapy and screening mammography: analysis of the results in the Bouches du Rhône programme , 1999, Journal of medical screening.

[7]  C. Herman,et al.  Short-term cessation of hormone replacement therapy and improvement of mammographic specificity. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  D. Cyrlak,et al.  Mammographic changes in postmenopausal women undergoing hormonal replacement therapy. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Andrew Evans,et al.  The effect of hormone replacement therapy on recall rate in the national health service breast screening programme , 1997 .

[10]  Screening mammography: sensitivity and specificity in relation to hormone replacement therapy. , 1997 .

[11]  I Persson,et al.  Effect of estrogen and estrogen-progestin replacement regimens on mammographic breast parenchymal density. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Anne M Kavanagh,et al.  Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening , 2000, The Lancet.

[13]  C A Kelsey,et al.  Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico. , 1998, Radiology.