Stentless bioprostheses in aortic root disease.

INTRODUCTION The availability of aortic homografts is steadily decreasing. In the meantime, stentless xenografts convey similar flow characteristics, and tissue preservation methods are improving durability. Initially, these valves were contraindicated in aortic roots with discrepancy between annulus and sinotubular junction or with extensive calcification or sepsis. With increasing experience stentless xenografts are now applied in a wide spectrum of aortic root disease. METHODS I reviewed our own experience with stentless aortic bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and more taxing root problems. I used these valves in aortic aneurysm repair, acute Type A dissection, and for endocarditis with abcess formation. I studied valve hemodynamics, regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, and comparative survival with stented bioprostheses. RESULTS Stentless bioprostheses convey hemodynamic and possibly survival benefit through a low incidence of valve-related complications. They provide a useful alternative to aortic homografts in endocarditis, Type A dissection, and aortic aneurysm surgery. CONCLUSIONS Stentless bioprostheses are no longer confined to AVR alone. Experience supports the use of stentless bioprostheses where aortic homografts were previously applied. With availability in a wide range of sizes.

[1]  S. Westaby,et al.  Pericardial and porcine stentless aortic valves: are they hemodynamically different? , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Affects Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement , 2000, Circulation.

[3]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  F. Mohr,et al.  Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. , 1999, Circulation.

[5]  P. Pibarot,et al.  Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve: comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  F. Schoen,et al.  Pathological analysis of nonstented Freestyle aortic root bioprostheses treated with amino oleic acid. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  D. Doty,et al.  Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  D. Doty,et al.  The effect of prosthetic valve type on survival after aortic valve surgery. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  H. Rakowski,et al.  The Toronto SPV: hemodynamic data at 1 and 5 years' postimplantation. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[10]  D. Doty,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Freestyle bioprosthesis: 5-year results. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  W. Jamieson,et al.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: hemodynamic comparison of stented and stentless aortic valves. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  A. Cordell,et al.  Comparison of results using "freestyle" stentless porcine aortic root bioprosthesis with cryopreserved aortic allograft. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  A. Gillinov,et al.  Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: mini-sternotomy with extended transseptal approach. , 1999, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  S. Westaby,et al.  Medium-term determinants of left ventricular mass index after stentless aortic valve replacement. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  G. Vaccari,et al.  Stentless Xenograft Repair of Excavating Aortic Root Sepsis , 1998, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[16]  A. Arifi,et al.  Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: versatility of the porcine aortic root. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  S. Armstrong,et al.  Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  S. Westaby,et al.  Stentless xenograft repair of the dissected aortic root. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[19]  S. Westaby,et al.  Stentless aortic bioprostheses: compelling data from the Second International Symposium. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  T. David,et al.  Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto Stentless Valve. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  V. Walley,et al.  Comparative results with the St. Jude Medical and Medtronic Hall mechanical valves. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  J. Pepper,et al.  Perioperative assessment of aortic homograft, Toronto stentless valve, and stented valve in the aortic position. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[23]  T. Sundt,et al.  Fourteen-year experience with homovital homografts for aortic valve replacement. , 1995, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  A. Cordell,et al.  Comparison of implantation techniques using freestyle stentless porcine aortic valve. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[25]  B. Rutt,et al.  Aortic Valve/Root Interactions in Porcine Hearts: Implications for Bioprosthetic Valve Sizing , 1991, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[26]  D. Levy Clinical significance of left ventricular hypertrophy: insights from the Framingham Study. , 1991, Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology.

[27]  O. Hess,et al.  Time course of regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. , 1988, Circulation.