More human than human?: a visual processing approach to exploring believability of android faces

The issue of believability is core to android science, the challenge of creating a robot that can pass as a near human. While researchers are making great strides in improving the quality of androids and their likeness to people, it is simultaneously important to develop theoretical foundations behind believability, and experimental methods for exploring believability. In this paper, we explore a visual processing approach to investigating the believability of android faces, and present results from a study comparing current-generation android faces to humans' faces. We show how android faces are still not quite as believable as humans, and provide some mechanisms that may be used to investigate and compare believability in future projects.

[1]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence? , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[2]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Human emotion and the uncanny valley: A GLM, MDS, and Isomap analysis of robot video ratings , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Sarah Bate,et al.  Socio-emotional functioning and face recognition ability in the normal population , 2010 .

[4]  David Lee,et al.  The art of designing robot faces: dimensions for human-robot interaction , 2006, HRI '06.

[5]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Android science: Toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework , 2005 .

[6]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Crossing the 'uncanny valley': adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. , 2010, Perception.

[7]  Marcus Cheetham,et al.  Category Processing and the human likeness dimension of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis: Eye-Tracking Data , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[8]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[9]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Looking just below the eyes is optimal across face recognition tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Matthew F. Peterson,et al.  Individual Differences in Eye Movements During Face Identification Reflect Observer-Specific Optimal Points of Fixation , 2013, Psychological science.

[11]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Understanding suitable locations for waiting , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Is The Uncanny Valley An Uncanny Cliff? , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Who Sees Human? , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[14]  P. Hills,et al.  First fixations in face processing: the more diagnostic they are the smaller the face-inversion effect. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[15]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[16]  Danilo De Rossi,et al.  HEFES: An Hybrid Engine for Facial Expressions Synthesis to control human-like androids and avatars , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[17]  Carey K. Morewedge.  Negativity bias in attribution of external agency. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Jason J S Barton,et al.  Information Processing during Face Recognition: The Effects of Familiarity, Inversion, and Morphing on Scanning Fixations , 2006, Perception.

[19]  F. Mast,et al.  Featural, Configural, and Holistic Face-Processing Strategies Evoke Different Scan Patterns , 2009, Perception.

[20]  C. Wallraven,et al.  Processing of facial identity and expression: a psychophysical, physiological, and computational perspective. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[21]  Andrew Olney,et al.  Upending the Uncanny Valley , 2005, AAAI.

[22]  Heloir,et al.  The Uncanny Valley , 2019, The Animation Studies Reader.

[23]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Crossing the ‘Uncanny Valley’: Adaptation to Cartoon Faces Can Influence Perception of Human Faces , 2010 .

[24]  R. Caldara,et al.  Investigating cultural diversity for extrafoveal information use in visual scenes. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[25]  David Lee,et al.  Perception of Robot Smiles and Dimensions for Human-Robot Interaction Design , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.