Methods for Counteracting Groupthink Risk: A Critical Appraisal

This paper examines methods for counteracting groupthink defined as the extreme concurrence seeking exhibited by decision making groups, typically under conditions of high threat and cohesion Janis, 1982. The authors identify three major categories of interventions potentially capable of mitigating groupthink tendencies: a traditional recommendations originally hypothesized by Janis, b methods for enhancing intellectual conflict during the decision making phase, and c procedures designed to minimize pressures for the activation of group social identity defenses. The authors critically review the limited research empirically examining these recommendations, identify both advantages and disadvantages associated with implementing these interventions, and discuss conditions under which they are likely to be effective and ineffective.

[1]  I. Janis,et al.  Decision Making during International Crises , 1987 .

[2]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[3]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  The Contribution of a Discussion Leader to the Quality of Group Thinking: The Effective Use of Minority Opinions , 1952 .

[4]  Andrew S. Grove,et al.  Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company and Career , 1996 .

[5]  K. Jehn,et al.  The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta-analysis. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[7]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  An experimental test of the effects of "developmental" vs. "free" discussions on the quality of group decisions. , 1957 .

[8]  Heather M. Caruso,et al.  The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. , 2011 .

[9]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Originality of word associations as a function of majority vs. minority influence. , 1985 .

[10]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  A Social Identity Maintenance Model of Groupthink. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[11]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. , 1993 .

[12]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making , 1984 .

[13]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives on Groupthink: A Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Appraisal. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[15]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Quality of first and second solutions in group problem solving. , 1960 .

[16]  Whyte,et al.  Recasting Janis's Groupthink Model: The Key Role of Collective Efficacy in Decision Fiascoes. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[17]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[18]  Lisa M. Leslie,et al.  Conflict cultures in organizations: how leaders shape conflict cultures and their organizational-level consequences. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Ramon J. Aldag,et al.  Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[20]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[21]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  Principles of human relations : applications to management , 1952 .

[22]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Threat, Cohesion, and Group Effectiveness: Testing a Social Identity Maintenance Perspective on Groupthink , 1992 .

[23]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Preventing Groupthink Risk through Deliberative Discussion: Further Experimental Evidence for a Social Identity Maintenance Model , 2014 .

[24]  N. Maier.  Assets and liabilities in group problem solving: the need for an integrative function. , 1967, Psychological review.

[25]  Won-Woo Park,et al.  A Review of research on Groupthink , 1990 .

[26]  G. Klein,et al.  Intuition at Work: Why Developing Your Gut Instincts Will Make You Better at What You Do , 2002 .

[27]  Clark McCauley,et al.  The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. , 1989 .

[28]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Effects of dominance on group decision making: toward a stress-reduction explanation of groupthink. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  C. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Explanation and Counter-Explanation on the Development and Use of Social Theories. , 1986 .

[30]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  How management teams can have a good fight. , 2009, Harvard business review.

[31]  Joanie B. Connell,et al.  Improving Decision Making by Means of Dissent1 , 2001 .

[32]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Team Effectiveness 1997-2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future , 2008 .

[33]  Alexander L. George,et al.  The Case for Multiple Advocacy in Making Foreign Policy , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Matie L. Flowers.  A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. , 1977 .

[35]  John M. Levine,et al.  Newcomer innovation in work teams. , 2003 .

[36]  Tammy L. Rapp,et al.  Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: The roles of team charters and performance strategies. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  Using trained "developmental" discussion leaders to improve further the quality of group decisions. , 1960 .

[38]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  The Quality of Group Decisions as Influenced by the Discussion Leader , 1950 .

[39]  B. Raven,et al.  Groupthink, Bay of Pigs, and Watergate Reconsidered. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[40]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  Extending the stepladder technique: An examination of self-paced stepladder groups. , 1998 .

[41]  C. R. Snyder.  Self-Handicapping Processes and Sequelae , 1990 .

[42]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  Gary Katzenstein,et al.  The Debate on Structured Debate: Toward a Unified Theory , 1996 .

[44]  A. Edmondson.  Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams , 2003 .

[45]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  SOCIAL IDENTITY MAINTENANCE PRESCRIPTIONS FOR PREVENTING GROUPTHINK: REDUCING IDENTITY PROTECTION AND ENHANCING INTELLECTUAL CONFLICT , 1994 .

[46]  R. Lawson,et al.  Groupthink: Deciding with the Leader and The Devil , 1996 .

[47]  J. K. Esser,et al.  Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. , 1989 .

[48]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[49]  A. Pratkanis,et al.  Mitigating groupthink by stimulating constructive conflict. , 1997 .

[50]  John A. Courtright,et al.  A laboratory investigation of groupthink , 1978 .

[51]  N. Maier.  Problem-solving discussions and conferences : leadership methods and skills , 1963 .

[52]  Dina Badie.  Groupthink, Iraq, and the War on Terror: Explaining US Policy Shift toward Iraq , 2010 .

[53]  B. Raven.  The Nixon Group1 , 1974 .

[54]  Steven G. Rogelberg,et al.  The Stepladder Technique: An Alternative Group Structure Facilitating Effective Group Decision Making , 1992 .

[55]  P. Nash.  One Minute to Midnight: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and Castro on the Brink of Nuclear War. By Michael Dobbs. (New York: Knopf, 2008. xvi, 426 pp. $28.95, ISBN 978-1-4000-4358-3.) , 2009 .

[56]  L. R. Hoffman,et al.  VALENCE IN THE ADOPTION OF SOLUTIONS BY PROBLEM-SOLVING GROUPS: CONCEPT, METHOD, AND RESULTS. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[57]  David A. Welch,et al.  The Cuban Missile Crisis: A Concise History , 2006 .

[58]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. , 1995 .

[59]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[60]  Kramer,et al.  Revisiting the Bay of Pigs and Vietnam Decisions 25 Years Later: How Well Has the Groupthink Hypothesis Stood the Test of Time? , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[61]  Timothy M. Franz,et al.  Does the Stepladder Technique improve group decision making? A series of failed replications. , 2008 .

[62]  Thomas Mussweiler,et al.  Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility , 2000 .

[63]  Carrie R. Leana.  A Partial Test of Janis' Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making , 1985 .