When What You Know Is Not Enough: Expertise and Gender Dynamics in Task Groups

This study investigates how the contribution, identification, and consideration of expertise within groups are affected by gender differences. The authors examined the effects of member expertise and gender on others’ perceptions of expertise, actual and own perceptions of influence, and group performance on a decision-making task. The authors’ findings are consistent with social role theory and expectation states theory. Women were less influential when they possessed expertise, and having expertise decreased how expert others perceived them to be. Conversely, having expertise was relatively positive for men. These differences were reflected in group performance, as groups with a female expert underperformed groups with a male expert. Thus, contrary to common expectations, possessing expertise did not ameliorate the gender effects often seen in workgroups. The findings are discussed in light of their implications for organizational workgroups in which contribution of expertise is critical to group performance.

[1]  John F. Veigal The Frequency of Self-Limiting Behavior in Groups: A Measure and an Explanation , 1991 .

[2]  J. Tedeschi The Social Influence Processes , 1972 .

[3]  Linda Nyquist,et al.  The female register: an empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses , 1977, Language in Society.

[4]  M. Biernat,et al.  Gender- and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research , 2000 .

[6]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Collective versus individual induction : recognition of truth, rejection of error, and collective information processing , 1991 .

[7]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information , 1999 .

[8]  J. E. Stake,et al.  Performance‐self‐esteem and dominance behavior in mixed‐sex dyads1 , 1979 .

[9]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance , 2002 .

[10]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in task groups. , 1986 .

[11]  張富鈞,et al.  從人際吸引(interpersonal attraction)的觀點談體育課中師生的互動 , 2000 .

[12]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of interpersonal orientation and the sex-type of the task on choosing to work alone or in groups. , 1989 .

[13]  W. Wood,et al.  TITLE Sex Differences in Interaction Style as a Product of Perceived Sex Differences in Competence , 2007 .

[14]  Marlaine E. Lockheed,et al.  Conceptualizing Sex as a Status Characteristic: Applications to Leadership Training Strategies , 1976 .

[15]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Nonverbal Cues and Status: An Expectation States Approach , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Gender and Social Influence: A Social Psychological Analysis. , 1983 .

[17]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. , 1989 .

[18]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[19]  S. Jackson Diversity in the Workplace: Human Resources Initiatives , 1992 .

[20]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Pygmalion in the classroom , 1968 .

[22]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program , 1981 .

[23]  M. Argyle,et al.  The Effects of Visibility on Interaction in a Dyad , 1968 .

[24]  William L. Gardner,et al.  Lessons in organizatoinal dramaturgy: The art of impression management , 1992 .

[25]  Joann Horai,et al.  The Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness Upon Opinion Agreement and Liking , 1974 .

[26]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. , 1992 .

[28]  G. Stasser,et al.  Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. , 1989 .

[29]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  Member Variation, Recognition of Expertise, and Group Performance , 1987 .

[30]  M. Foschi,et al.  Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants , 1994 .

[31]  Philip Yetton,et al.  An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving performance , 1988 .

[32]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The statistical analysis of data from small groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women , 1996 .

[34]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[35]  Frederick C. Miner,et al.  Group versus individual decision making: An investigation of performance measures, decision strategies, and process losses/gains , 1984 .

[36]  E. Holly Buttner,et al.  The interactive effect of influence tactic, applicant gender, and type of job on hiring recommendations , 1996 .

[37]  K. Propp,et al.  An Experimental Examination of Biological Sex as a Status Cue in Decision-Making Groups and Its Influence on Information Use , 1995 .

[38]  Kenneth McBey,et al.  Do My Contributions Matter? The Influence of Imputed Expertise on Member Involvement and Self-Evaluations in the Work Group , 2001 .

[39]  Robert A. Altemeyer,et al.  Sexual identity, physical attractiveness and seating position as determinants of influence in discussion groups. , 1974 .

[40]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[41]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. , 1995 .

[42]  C. Keating,et al.  Power Displays Between Women and Men in Discussions of Gender-Linked Tasks: A Multichannel Study , 1988 .

[43]  D. H. Zimmerman,et al.  9. Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation , 1996 .

[44]  Marceline B. R. Kroon,et al.  Group Versus Individual Decision Making , 1992 .

[45]  G. M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Coordination in Task-Performing Groups , 2002 .

[46]  Barbara Westbrook Eakins,et al.  Sex differences in human communication , 1978 .

[47]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups , 1994 .

[48]  S. Worchel,et al.  Behavioral styles and the influence of women in mixed-sex groups. , 1996 .

[49]  Preston C. Bottger Expertise and air time as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem-solving groups. , 1984 .

[50]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of a best-member strategy , 1982 .

[51]  B. Tepper,et al.  Strength of Subordinates’ Upward Influence Tactics and Gender Congruency Effects1 , 1993 .

[52]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Nonverbal behavior, gender, and influence. , 1995 .

[53]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance , 1996 .

[54]  Gwen M. Wittenbaum,et al.  Information Sampling in Decision-Making Groups , 1998 .

[55]  David G. Wagner,et al.  Can gender inequalities be reduced , 1986 .

[56]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication and Persuasion: Psychological Studies of Opinion Change , 1982 .

[57]  A. Hollingshead,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and Assumptions about Expertise in Transactive Memory , 2003 .

[58]  J. Piliavin,et al.  The effects of the sex composition of groups on style of social interaction , 1978 .

[59]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[60]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. , 1969, Sociometry.

[61]  A. Mulac,et al.  Male/female language differences and effects in same‐sex and mixed‐sex dyads: The gender‐linked language effect , 1988 .

[62]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[63]  Rebecca A. Henry,et al.  Improving Group Judgment Accuracy: Information Sharing and Determining the Best Member , 1995 .

[64]  P. Yetton,et al.  Individual and Group Judgments of Internal Control Systems , 1983 .

[65]  A. Eagly,et al.  Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies , 1981 .

[66]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[67]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Negative Interdependence and Prejudice: Whence the Affect? , 1993 .

[68]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Gender, Status, and Leadership , 2001 .

[69]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[70]  Linda L. Carli Gender and Social Influence , 2001 .

[71]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Status in Groups: The Importance of Motivation. , 1982 .

[72]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[73]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. , 1984 .

[74]  M. Dasborough Leading and managing people in the dynamic organization. , 2004 .

[75]  S. Karau,et al.  Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: a meta-analysis. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  INTERRUPTIONS IN GROUP DISCUSSIONS: THE EFFECTS OF GENDER AND GROUP COMPOSITION* , 1989 .

[77]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  Recognition and utilization of expertise in problem-solving groups: Expert characteristics and behavior. , 1997 .

[78]  Lynette Hirschman Female–male differences in conversational interaction , 1994 .

[79]  G. Littlepage,et al.  Effects of Task Experience and Group Experience on Group Performance, Member Ability, and Recognition of Expertise , 1997 .

[80]  D. Broverman,et al.  Sex‐Role Stereotypes: A Current Appraisal , 1972 .

[81]  Judith D. Singer,et al.  Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models , 1998 .

[82]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Nonverbal Behavior, Dominance, and the Basis of Status in Task Groups , 1987 .

[83]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[84]  B. Meeker,et al.  Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups. , 1977, American sociological review.

[85]  Lynn Smith-Lovin,et al.  THE GENDER SYSTEM AND INTERACTION , 1999 .

[86]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[87]  Lisa Troyer,et al.  Whose Expectations Matter? The Relative Power of First‐ and Second‐Order Expectations in Determining Social Influence1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[88]  M. D. Pugh,et al.  Neutralizing Sexism in Mixed-Sex Groups: Do Women Have to Be Better Than Men? , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[89]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction. , 1966 .

[90]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational learning and new product development: CORE processes. , 1999 .

[91]  T. Heller,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Correlations Between Leadership Status and Participation Rates Reported in the Literature , 1979 .

[92]  G. Stasser,et al.  Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What , 1995 .

[93]  T. Schleicher,et al.  Empowering Token Women Leaders , 1998 .

[94]  J. Levine,et al.  Shared Cognition in-Organizations: The Management of Knowledge , 1999 .

[95]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  Quality of Group Judgment , 1977 .