Polychronicity: review of the literature and a new configuration for the study of this hidden dimension of online learning

Polychronicity is the natural tendency or preference for structuring time that has an influence on people’s behaviors. Highly polychronic individuals are involved in everything, doing many things at once because they value human relationships and interactions over arbitrary schedules and appointments. In contrast, highly monochronic individuals focus on one thing at a time, perceive other events as interruptions, and stress a high degree of scheduling, and promptness in meeting obligations and attending appointments. Although time is an important variable in educational contexts, and in particular in online learning, there is a lack of studies on polychronicity in educational research. This article reviews, summarizes, and extends the literature on polychronicity conceptualization and assessment; it discusses the limitations of the results and offers a multidimensional proposal for a polychronicity construct. Finally, the implications of students’ time differences and their impact on instructional situations are discussed.

[1]  Patrick Parrish,et al.  Cultural Dimensions of Learning: Addressing the Challenges of Multicultural Instruction , 2010 .

[2]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  A Conceptual Typology of Multitasking Behavior and Polychronicity Preferences , 2012 .

[3]  Heejin Lee,et al.  Contextualising Virtuality : Polychronicity and Multipresence , 2001 .

[4]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Conceptualizing time, space and computing for work and organizing , 2010 .

[5]  Tracey E. Rizzuto,et al.  A construct‐oriented analysis of individual‐level polychronicity , 1999 .

[6]  C. Kaufman,et al.  Exploring More Than 24 Hours a Day: A Preliminary Investigation of Polychronic Time Use , 1991 .

[7]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  The effects of individual time urgency on group polychronicity , 1999 .

[8]  Carol Felker Kaufman,et al.  Understanding consumer information needs: the impact of polychronic time use , 1997 .

[9]  Jeffrey M. Conte,et al.  Polychronicity, Big Five Personality Dimensions, and Sales Performance , 2005 .

[10]  J. D. Lindquist.  Time management and polychronicity Comparisons , contrasts , and insights for the workplace , 1998 .

[11]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Time for Reflection: A Critical Examination of Polychronicity , 2010 .

[12]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Discerning Culture in E-Learning and in the Global Workplaces , 2009 .

[13]  Todd J. Arnold,et al.  The effects of polychronic-orientation upon retail employee satisfaction and turnover , 2006 .

[14]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture , 1999 .

[15]  Ravindra S. Goonetilleke,et al.  The relationship between monochronicity, polychronicity and individual characteristics , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Jeffrey M. Conte.  Measuring Temporal Constructs Across Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2007 .

[17]  David K. Palmer,et al.  Unpackaging the multiple aspects of time in polychronicity , 1999 .

[18]  Waipeng Lee,et al.  Polychronicity, the Internet, and the Mass Media: A Singapore Study , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[20]  Ji-Hye Park,et al.  Factors Influencing Adult Learners' Decision to Drop Out or Persist in Online Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[21]  S. Adams,et al.  Time use in Spain: is polychronicity a cultural phenomenon? , 2010 .

[22]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time , 1992 .

[23]  Elizabeth M. Poposki,et al.  The Multitasking Preference Inventory: Toward an Improved Measure of Individual Differences in Polychronicity , 2010 .

[24]  E. Hall,et al.  The Dance of Life: The Other Dimension of Time , 1984 .

[25]  E. Hall,et al.  Hidden Differences: Doing Business with the Japanese , 1987 .

[26]  D. Lynne Persing,et al.  Managing in polychronic times: Exploring individual creativity and performance in intellectually intensive venues , 1999 .

[27]  Carol Kaufman–Scarborough,et al.  Time management and polychronicity , 1999 .

[28]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[29]  Margarida Romero,et al.  Assessment of e-learners' temporal patterns in an online collaborative writing task , 2010 .

[30]  H. Lee,et al.  Time and information technology: monochronicity, polychronicity and temporal symmetry , 1999 .

[31]  Allen C. Bluedorn.  Polychronicity, Individuals, and Organizations , 2007 .

[32]  Charles Benabou.  Polychronicity and temporal dimensions of work in learning organizations , 1999 .

[33]  Cornelius J. Konig,et al.  Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not , 2005 .

[34]  E. Hall,et al.  Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French and Americans , 1990 .

[35]  Robert Johansen,et al.  Globalwork : bridging distance, culture, and time , 1994 .

[36]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work‐unit polychronicity , 1999 .

[37]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Time-User Preference and Technology Acceptance: Measure Development of Computer Polychronicity , 2009 .

[38]  Marie Murgolo-Poore,et al.  Technology and its impact on polychronic tome use: a research plan , 2001 .

[39]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Managing Time in a Software Factory: Temporal and Spatial Organization of IS Development Activities , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[40]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Temporal issues in e-learning research: A literature review , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  G. Leinhardt,et al.  Going the Distance With Online Education , 2006 .

[42]  Elaine L. Chao.  Adult learners in higher education: barriers to success and strategies to improve results , 2008 .

[43]  I. E. Allen,et al.  Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011. , 2011 .

[44]  S. Adams,et al.  Polychronicity in modern Madrid: An interview study , 2012 .

[45]  Julia C. Duncheon,et al.  Changing Conceptions of Time , 2013 .

[46]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[47]  Thomas E. Slocombe.  Applying the theory of reasoned action to the analysis of an individual’s polychronicity , 1999 .

[48]  M. Gannon,et al.  Understanding Global Cultures: Metaphorical Journeys Through 17 Countries , 1994 .

[49]  P. Shalit.  The Silent Language , 1964 .

[50]  A. Giddens.  The consequences of modernity , 1990 .

[51]  Keith Tyler-Smith.  Early Attrition among First Time eLearners: A Review of Factors that Contribute to Drop-out, Withdrawal and Non-completion Rates of Adult Learners undertaking eLearning Programmes , 2006 .

[52]  Carol Kaufman–Scarborough,et al.  The Polychronic—Monochronic Tendency Model , 2007 .

[53]  Barbara Allan,et al.  Time to Learn? , 2007 .

[54]  Guy M. Goodwin,et al.  Introduction to Systematic Reviews , 2004, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[55]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Time-related behaviour in multitasking situations , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[56]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.