Height Differences in English Dialects: Consequences for Processing and Representation

This study examines the role of abstractness during the activation of a lexical representation. Abstractness and conflict are directly modeled in our approach by invoking lexical representations in terms of contrastive phonological features. In two priming experiments with English nouns differing only in vowel height of their stem vowels (e.g., pin vs. pan), we compare a conflict versus non-conflict situation across English dialects. Based on differences in the vowel height representation, the conflict occurs in American English, but not in New Zealand English. The results show that there is a lack of priming in the conflict, but not in the non-conflict situation. This is taken as evidence for the claim that lexical access is sensitive to conflicts and non-conflicts between acoustic-phonetic and phonological information. We therefore conclude that discrete phonological features are crucial determiners for successful speech perception, which is in line with abstractionist approaches.

[1]  S. Goldinger.  Auditory Lexical Decision , 1996 .

[2]  P. Change.  Some Thoughts on , 1988 .

[3]  L. G. Kelly,et al.  The phonemes of New Zealand English , 1966, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[4]  S. Goldinger.  A COMPLEMENTARY-SYSTEMS APPROACH TO ABSTRACT AND EPISODIC SPEECH PERCEPTION , 2007 .

[5]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[6]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[7]  J. Hay,et al.  From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception , 2006 .

[8]  Jen Hay,et al.  Using Sound Change to Explore the Mental Lexicon , 2006 .

[9]  M. Halle,et al.  On Feature Spreading and the Representation of Place of Articulation , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[10]  Coarticulation • Suprasegmentals,et al.  Acoustic Phonetics , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[11]  Claudia K. Friedrich,et al.  Neurophysiological correlates of mismatch in lexical access , 2005, BMC Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Scobbie.  Interface and Overlap in Phonetics and Phonology , 2007 .

[13]  G. Potts,et al.  Effects of dialect on merger perception: ERP and behavioral correlates , 2005, Brain and Language.

[14]  John Kingston.  Integrating Articulations in the Perception of Vowel Height , 1991 .

[15]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for vowel change in New Zealand English , 2000, Language Variation and Change.

[16]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The handbook of phonological theory , 2011 .

[17]  Allan Bell,et al.  The phonetics of fish and chips in New Zealand: Marking national and ethnic identities , 1997 .

[18]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The perception of phonemic contrasts in a non-native dialect. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J. Hay,et al.  The rise and rise of New Zealand English DRESS , 2004 .

[20]  P. Ladefoged.  A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[21]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[22]  C. Pallier,et al.  The Influence of Native-Language Phonology on Lexical Access: Exemplar-Based Versus Abstract Lexical Entries , 2001, Psychological science.

[23]  D. R. Ladd,et al.  Phonetics in Phonology , 2011 .

[24]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Phonetic Interpretation Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI: Effects on word recognition of syllable-onset cues to syllable-coda voicing , 2004 .

[25]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[26]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1989, Language.

[27]  Hartmut R. Pf.  Acoustic Correlates of the IPA Vowel Diagram , 2003 .

[28]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[29]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  Notes on New Zealand English Phonetics and Phonology , 1986 .

[30]  K. Forster.  The Microgenesis of Priming Effects in Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[31]  P. Keating.  Underspecification in Phonetics , 1988, Phonology.

[32]  Elizabeth Gordon,et al.  The Story of New Zealand English: What the ONZE Project Tells Us , 2004 .

[33]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[34]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Some consequences of Lexical Phonology , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[35]  Mirco Ghini.  Place of articulation first , 2001 .

[36]  Christian Langstrof,et al.  The Short Front Vowels in NZE in the Intermediate Period , 2003 .

[37]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .

[38]  John C. Wells,et al.  Accents of English , 1982 .

[39]  Koenraad Kuiper,et al.  New Zealand English , 2000 .

[40]  J. L. Miller,et al.  Speech perception: from signal to word. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[41]  P. Trudgill,et al.  New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution , 2004 .

[42]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[43]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  R. Fox,et al.  Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language , 2000, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[46]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The Effects of Associative and Semantic Priming in the Lexical Decision Task , 2022 .

[47]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Henning Reetz.  CONVERTING SPEECH SIGNALS TO PHONOLOGICAL FEATURES , 1999 .

[49]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[50]  Paul Warren,et al.  Chapter ? ? The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception , 2005 .

[51]  George N. Clements,et al.  The geometry of phonological features , 1985, Phonology Yearbook.

[52]  Claudia K. Friedrich,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for underspecified lexical representations: asymmetries with word initial variations. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning , 1993, Speech Commun..

[54]  J. Wells.  Accents of English I: An Introduction , 1982 .

[55]  W. Labov,et al.  The Atlas Of North American English , 2005 .

[56]  Henning Reetz.  UNDERSPECIFIED PHONOLOGICAL FEATURES FOR LEXICAL ACCESS , 2000 .

[57]  S. Goldinger.  Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  J. Wells.  Accents of English 3: North America , 1982 .

[59]  Christian Langstrof.  Acoustic evidence for a push-chain shift in the Intermediate Period of New Zealand English , 2006, Language Variation and Change.

[60]  Christophe Pallier,et al.  Language-specific listening , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  D. Klatt.  Review of selected models of speech perception , 1989 .

[62]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for the English Language , 2002 .

[63]  Mathias Scharinger,et al.  The representation of vocalic features in vowel alternations : Phonological, morphological and computational aspects , 2006 .

[64]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Hartmut R. Pfitzinger,et al.  Acoustic correlates of the IPA vowel diagram , 2003 .

[66]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  An acoustic comparison between New Zealand and Australian English vowels , 1998 .

[67]  Mathias Scharinger,et al.  Minimal representations of alternating vowels , 2009 .

[68]  Diana Archangeli,et al.  Aspects of underspecification theory , 1988, Phonology.

[69]  A. Lahiri,et al.  Neurobiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Representations in the Mental Lexicon during Speech Recognition , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[70]  Patrizia Tabossi,et al.  Cross-Modal Semantic Priming , 1996 .

[71]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Tracking speech comprehension in space and time , 2006, NeuroImage.